Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

XM607, Waddington's Warbird

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

XM607, Waddington's Warbird

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27th Jan 2006, 23:26
  #21 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: The Wonderful Midlands
Age: 53
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cheers Bob,

We aim to please

The Vulcan has been moved around Waddington a fair bit over the last few years, but not in the sense of "Where would this look best", more in the sense of "Where can we hide this bag of s**t now"

It was parked by the Thompson Buildings on display for a long time, this is where it is pictured on the Waddington website. It was moved in 2002 to Alpha dispersal where it remained tucked in a corner for the year, being towed onto the waterside for the airshow. It was then moved to the GSE graveyard by the golf course and A15, overlooking Echo dispersal, and remained there until at least 6 months ago. There were talks afoot to place it by the 'spotters car park' as long as 4 years ago, but nothing came of this.

My main point is that the aircraft in its self is sadly deteriorating to a point where criminally, it will need to be disposed of in a few years. The oleos and jacks are rusting away nicely, and the cockpit is stuck closed. Even if the general public and Bob can look at it, while he travels to the UK's premier fighter base from the wrong side of a security fence, it is still in a terrible condition, and nothing is being done to preserve what I and doubtless many other people consider to be the most important Vulcan remaining today. As Tim has said, the aircraft should be in a hangar at the very least, and what an outstanding idea from BEagle, why not get the baby EngO's as part of their training to chip in, and return a fantastic part of our history to a respectable condition?
The Rocket is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2006, 23:39
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 927
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As I mentioned previously, I don't see why a fundraising effort couldn't be initiated to construct a suitable shed for 607. There's plenty of space in the WAVE on the other side of the A15, and it would make a great exhibition and visitor centre too (and be much less grubby than the old portacabin that they have on the car park at present!).
On the basis of earlier projects, I would imagine that the Lottery people would be happy to stump-up at least half of the cost, so all it needs is someone in the right place to actually do it. Look the the people at Bruntingthorpe who have succesfully set-about reconstructing Wattisham's QRA sheds there through their own fundraising efforts...
Perhaps the former Vulcan people on Pprune could approach Waddington's Station Commander and point-out what a shameful situation this is, and suggest that we start trying to raise some cash, before 607 ends-up like the one at Blackpool.
Tim McLelland is offline  
Old 27th Jan 2006, 23:47
  #23 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: The Wonderful Midlands
Age: 53
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tim,

I wholeheartedly agree, And I think it's about time actions rather than words happened in this instance, before another piece of our history is lost forever.
The Rocket is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2006, 00:06
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Swindonshire
Posts: 2,007
Received 16 Likes on 8 Posts
If something is to be done, perhaps Lord Garden (sometimes seen on these means) could be persuaded to raise the matter?

After all, unless my memory completely fails me, he is the only former Vulcan Squadron CO in parliament (although I don't know if he ever flew XM607).
Archimedes is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2006, 08:35
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: ISLE OF MAN
Posts: 780
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TIM

I presume from the hint in your email either the name you use here, or the one on the jacket of the Vulcan Story isn't your real one?

The book I was referring I can't remember the name of or who it was by, it's that bl**dy long since I've seen it. It was a round up of the dispersal of all the remaining airframes around the world. I gave it to Rudolf to have a well known Vulcan pilot sign it. He assures me he hasn't since sold it on Ebay.

I note on p. 137 of the Vulcan Story, comment is made even then that 607 was the one that really should be inside, and was just being left to fend for itself.

Historically, this a/c is probably as important as a 617 Lanc. - and look how many of those are left.
STANDTO is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2006, 15:53
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Royal Berkshire
Posts: 1,744
Received 79 Likes on 41 Posts
Originally Posted by STANDTO
TIM
Historically, this a/c is probably as important as a 617 Lanc. - and look how many of those are left.
Well there's a parallel there, in that Guy Gibson's actual Dams Raid Lancaster, ED932, continued in use after the war as part of the Scampton Station Flight, before being scrapped at Scampton without thought in July 1947

What wouldn't a museum give for that as an exhibit today....

Which makes me still wonder when deciding by which Vulcan was going to go to the RAF Museum......they picked XL318 over a Black Buck mission example and in particular XM607.....
GeeRam is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2006, 16:40
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Britain
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Tim McLelland
There was no reason for the Victor's destruction, other than a decision made by some fool at the MoD, that RAF bases should only have one "gate guard".
Without wishing to open a can of worms on someone's doorstep - how many bases does this actually apply too? Leuchars has an F3 and a Phantom on the gate, plus a Lightning at Tremblers and another Phantom round at the (Fighting) Cocks. Also, Marham has that plastic Tonka, plus a Victor outside SHQ. Are there any more examples of this duplicity? If so, it puts a precedent towards having more than one guard, at which point Waddo could get it's arse in gear and crack on with restoring this historically important aircraft. After all, wasn't the publishing of those History of the RAF books all about reminding the new kids in the service about our heritage? What better way than being able to see such an impressive bit of hardware in the flesh.
tonkatechie is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2006, 16:58
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Here and there
Age: 41
Posts: 245
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Coningsby has two as well - a blah-jet (Phantom) on the LH side as you drive in, and an F3 that looks pretty plasticky on the RH side just before the exit...
frodo_monkey is offline  
Old 28th Jan 2006, 19:51
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 927
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, to explain a little more fully, the "one gate guard" rule came and went rather swiftly. I never found-out what idiot introduced the rule, but almost as soon as it was imposed, it seemed to be forgotten-about again, and additional airframes began to re-appear at various stations. But of course by this time, airframes such as the Victor had long since been destroyed for no reason, other than the whim of some areh*le who had nothing better to do.
The disturbing thing is that there's no reason why another lunatic couldn't come along and repeat the saga all over again.
Standto, yes I was being sarcastic - The Vulcan Story was my book (I changed my surname for boring family reasons last year) and it did have a complete disposals list in it, and as far as I'm aware, only one minor mistake was found in it, so it's pretty accurate. The book was okay apart from the ghastly print quality in the reprinted edition.
I will of course include a new disposals list in my new Vulcan book, but that isn't scheduled to be publsihed until the end of 2007, in company with a similar book on the Hunter, and a rather spectacular book (or at least I hope it will be!) on the RAF!
In the meantime, you'll be able to amuse yourself with a new fortnightly partwork magazine on the RAF which is due to appear soon. I saw the dummy for the first issue and it looks like the usual load of garbage you might expect, so it should be good for a few laughs!
Tim McLelland is offline  
Old 29th Jan 2006, 14:52
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: ISLE OF MAN
Posts: 780
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ah, but will it come with heirloom miniatures of historic a/c (usual price £6.99 ) first issue 99p, or maybe a 1/3 scale vulcan which you get a bit for every fortnight?
STANDTO is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2006, 01:33
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 927
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I dunno, but I suppose it's quite likely!
One of these days, someone will produce a magazine that I'd actually consider buying (I won't hold my breath though)
Tim McLelland is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2006, 12:42
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: At piece.
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oooo Oooo - not wanting to be left out - Colt has two as well. A shiny Jag and a Hurricane in front of SHQ. Not for long though
OCCWMF is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2006, 16:04
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 927
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Aye, they'll doubtless get dumped unless someone rescues them.
Of course, the real champions of stupidity are the RAF Museum. Owners of the only surviving Vulcan B1, and what did they do? They left it oustide to rust and then announced that it would be uneconomical to repair. Now, unless I've completely misunderstood the concept of a museum, I thought the idea was to restore and preserve, not ignore and destroy?
But then they also cut-up one of only two surviving Beverley transports, replacing it with a plastic Spitfire and Hurricane. Hmm... I suppose we shouldn't be surprised by anything, when you look at Hendon's new extension, and the main exhibits are... a BF-109 and a P-51. Confused? I know I am!
Tim McLelland is offline  
Old 31st Jan 2006, 17:56
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Royal Berkshire
Posts: 1,744
Received 79 Likes on 41 Posts
Originally Posted by OCCWMF
Oooo Oooo - not wanting to be left out - Colt has two as well. A shiny Jag and a Hurricane in front of SHQ. Not for long though
That's a shiney Jag and a plastic replica Hurricane
GeeRam is offline  
Old 1st Feb 2006, 13:58
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Near the coast
Posts: 2,371
Received 554 Likes on 152 Posts
Ooooh, get you!

It still looks the part though!
BV
Bob Viking is offline  
Old 2nd Feb 2006, 22:12
  #36 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: The Wonderful Midlands
Age: 53
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Are you going to be moving that up to Coningsby with the rest of your museum pieces Bob?
The Rocket is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2006, 21:52
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 497
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
As regards XL318 in the RAFM, it was earmarked for there when retired (having performed the last 617 Sq. Vulcan sortie, on 11 December 1981). It was transported to Hendon in sections and installed there in about February 1982, some months before the Falklands war and XM607's historic mission. Hence it is not really a question of its having been chosen over a more historically significant airframe.
Liffy 1M is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2006, 07:13
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 497
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
My information comes from a very comprehensive article (more like a mini-book) by Paul Jackson in "Wings of Fame" Vol. 3. I imagine it is drawn from official sources but that's not to say there couldn't be an error. I would recommend this article strongly to anyone with an interest in the Vulcan.
Liffy 1M is offline  
Old 7th Feb 2006, 15:57
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 927
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If only there were any "official sources" to draw such information from!
Thankfully, Paul does know what he's talking about, and yes, the Hendon Vulcan saga essentially took place ahead of 607's retirement, which is why 318 is in Hendon, and 607 is parked on the A15.

But of course, explaining why the situation is as it is, doesn't necessarily imply that it's a good situation to be in. It doesn't make 607's future any more secure.

As I said previously, it needs someone (or a group) to get 607 under cover, with Lottery help or whatever else it takes. But the aircraft still belongs to Waddington, and I suspect that unless someone with influence (or at least someone who can successfully bend the ear of the Station Commander) decides to do something about it, then it seems certain that 607 will just languish at the roadside until it is declared unsafe, and ultimately scrapped.
Tim McLelland is offline  
Old 7th Feb 2006, 19:53
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi Tim,

In re: to your Vulcan book, what mistakes/errors are you aware of?

Thanks.

Steve

Originally Posted by Tim McLelland
Well, to explain a little more fully, the "one gate guard" rule came and went rather swiftly. I never found-out what idiot introduced the rule, but almost as soon as it was imposed, it seemed to be forgotten-about again, and additional airframes began to re-appear at various stations. But of course by this time, airframes such as the Victor had long since been destroyed for no reason, other than the whim of some areh*le who had nothing better to do.
The disturbing thing is that there's no reason why another lunatic couldn't come along and repeat the saga all over again.
Standto, yes I was being sarcastic - The Vulcan Story was my book (I changed my surname for boring family reasons last year) and it did have a complete disposals list in it, and as far as I'm aware, only one minor mistake was found in it, so it's pretty accurate. The book was okay apart from the ghastly print quality in the reprinted edition.
I will of course include a new disposals list in my new Vulcan book, but that isn't scheduled to be publsihed until the end of 2007, in company with a similar book on the Hunter, and a rather spectacular book (or at least I hope it will be!) on the RAF!
In the meantime, you'll be able to amuse yourself with a new fortnightly partwork magazine on the RAF which is due to appear soon. I saw the dummy for the first issue and it looks like the usual load of garbage you might expect, so it should be good for a few laughs!
smarchitelli is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.