F15 pilots - world's best? - discuss.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: globetrotter
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
F15 pilots - world's best? - discuss.
12:21:05
(c) 2005. The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.
TYNDALL AIR FORCE BASE, Fla. (AP) - The Air Force's new F-22A Raptor is such a dominant fighter jet that in mock dogfights its pilots typically take on six F-15 Eagles at once.
Despite the favorable odds, the F-15s, still one of the world's most capable fighters, are no contest for the fastest radar-evading stealth jet ever built.
"The F-15 pilots, they are the world's best pilots," said Lt. Col. David Krumm, an F-22A instructor pilot. "When you take them flying against anyone else in the world, they are going to wipe the floor with them. It's a startling moment for them to come down here and get waylaid."
Discuss.
(c) 2005. The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.
TYNDALL AIR FORCE BASE, Fla. (AP) - The Air Force's new F-22A Raptor is such a dominant fighter jet that in mock dogfights its pilots typically take on six F-15 Eagles at once.
Despite the favorable odds, the F-15s, still one of the world's most capable fighters, are no contest for the fastest radar-evading stealth jet ever built.
"The F-15 pilots, they are the world's best pilots," said Lt. Col. David Krumm, an F-22A instructor pilot. "When you take them flying against anyone else in the world, they are going to wipe the floor with them. It's a startling moment for them to come down here and get waylaid."
Discuss.
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
When the pilots are given the tools they are trained to use, in the environments they train to fight in history shows they are unbeatable.
That was not the case in India (or with the F-15Es and the Typhoons *yawn)*.
That was not the case in India (or with the F-15Es and the Typhoons *yawn)*.
I would take what you read in the press with a large pinch of salt, after all, they're hardly going to say their new wonder toy is rubbish.
If the F22 is taking on 6 F15s in a visual merge and winning then I will eat my head! Have you ever seen a man eat his own head?
If the F22 is taking on 6 F15s in a visual merge and winning then I will eat my head! Have you ever seen a man eat his own head?
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Hook, Hants
Age: 68
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
one could probably kick this one around all day long and get nowhere near the truth - using anything written in the press is certainly not going to help! I'm not, and never have been, an Eagle driver - but I bet mine is bigger than yours! let the debate rage
Guest
Posts: n/a
"Kooler" Krum actually was probably one of the best F-15 drivers around, hence his selection for the F-22 introduction to service.
ALL F-15 pilots being the best - nope. Many are, certainly not all. Same as for any airframe - you're going to have a group of absolutely outstanding pilots, a group of competent ones, and a smaller group of "how the hell did you get in here?!" ones.
Probably the best F-15 force - the IDF/AF
ALL F-15 pilots being the best - nope. Many are, certainly not all. Same as for any airframe - you're going to have a group of absolutely outstanding pilots, a group of competent ones, and a smaller group of "how the hell did you get in here?!" ones.
Probably the best F-15 force - the IDF/AF
Cope India
NC43
I take it that you missed the strong political undertones behind the release of the Cope India results *by Indian Air Force sources*? Asides from which, have you ever heard of 'cuffs'?
I take it that you missed the strong political undertones behind the release of the Cope India results *by Indian Air Force sources*? Asides from which, have you ever heard of 'cuffs'?
They may well be the best, but they are probably not the best trained, nor the most adaptable.
With regard to Cope India
"..............Publicly, senior USAF officers generalised about what had happened. "What we faced were superior numbers, and an IAF pilot who was very proficient in his aircraft and smart on tactics. That combination was tough for us to overcome," said Colonel Greg Neubeck, exercise director and deputy commander of the 3rd Wing's Operations Group.
“From what we've seen in the last two weeks is, the IAF can stand toe-to-toe with best AF in the world. I pity the pilot who has to face the IAF and chances the day to underestimate him; because he won't be going home. The (Indian) pilots are as aggressive as our pilots. They are excellent aviators; they work very hard at mission planning; they try to get as much out of a mission or sortie as possible, just like us. From one fighter pilot to another, there's really not that much difference in how we prepare for a mission and what we want to get out of it.”
Training
While the USAF's warm remarks about the parity between Indian and US pilots seemed superficially generous, they may not have been generous enough. All the evidence from Cope India suggests that the Indian pilots might actually be better trained and better skilled than their USAF counterparts, and not merely their equals.
This should have come as no surprise to the USAF, since the Indian Air Force has a long and proud history, has been to war (against a 'quality opponent' four times since 1945) and maintains a high state of operational readiness, ready to react should tension with Pakistan or China explode into conflict. And because of this conflict, and because of the risk of war, the IAF is well-equipped and generously funded. Indian pilots actually fly almost twice as many hours per month as their USAF counterparts. Moreover, much more of that flying is undertaken under operational conditions, and Indian pilots train against other Indian pilots who don't try to simulate an inferior threat, but who simply do their best to win. In effect, Indian pilots train against the best, reasoning that lesser opponents will pose less of a problem if you can beat the finest!
By comparison, the way in which the USAF trains against a 'Red air' threat is rather less 'challenging'.
For many years the USAF has assumed that its fighters and fighter pilots are more capable than enemy aircraft and aircrew, and so in order to achieve 'realism' the US Air Force has simulated enemy capability by using 'enemy' forces ('Red Air') who deliberately use the tactics of 'real-world' threat air forces, and who operate under rules that intentionally constrain their combat capability.
After Cope India, shocked USAF pilots admitted that they had problems with the Indian simulated active missile threat because they had not routinely trained against launch-and-leave threats. They also admitted that they had underestimated the training and tactics of the Indian pilots.
A senior USAF officer said that: "The Air Force is re-examining, from what I can understand, our concept of red air and how we might be able to provide red air to our fighter forces so that we get [the best] training we can afford." The USAF's exercise leader admitted that the USAF needed to "take off the handcuffs that we put on our red air training aids and allow them to be more aggressive and make the red air tougher than we have in the past."
The Indian Air Force report into the exercise was never intended for publication, but details have become known. The document was reportedly highly critical of its USAF adversaries. The Indian aviation magazine 'Vayu' reported that the report had noted a number of weaknesses in the USAF pilots, including an 'absence of initiative', 'blind obedience to rehearsed scenarios', and a 'lack of adaptability'.
Tactics
Though training plays a part in air combat success, tactics are equally important. During Cope India, the USAF found itself saddled with tactics that were ineffective, and facing an enemy whose tactical flexibility proved hard to counter.
Major Mark A. Snowden, the 3rd Wing's chief of air-to-air tactics and one of the USAF pilots who participated in Cope India, later spoke admiringly about the way in which Indian Air Force planners never repeated failed tactics and praised their ability to rapidly change tactics as new opportunities became available.
“The outcome of the exercise boils down to the fact that they ran tactics that were more advanced than we expected. They could come up with a game plan, but if it wasn't working they would call an audible and change tactics in flight. They were adept at mixing things up and never provided the same tactical 'look'. They would analyze what we were doing and then try something else. They weren't afraid to bring the strikers in high or low. They would move them around so that we could never anticipate from day to day what we were going to see.”
By comparison, the USAF failed to surprise the Indians, relying on the simple expedient of putting up a 'wall' of four F-15s between the enemy and the target. This is a tactic that has proved useful against other adversaries, but it relies on the use of long-range missiles with greater reach than those employed by the enemy - and this is something the USAF could not rely on in Cope India.
“We didn't have the beyond-visual-range shot or the numerical advantage.” Stockwell said. “Eventually we were just worn down by the numbers. They were very smart about it. Their goal was to get to a target area, engage the target and then withdraw without prolonging the fight. If there were a couple of Eagles still alive away from the target area, they would keep them pinned in, get done with the target and then egress with all their forces. All their aircraft seemed to be capable of breaking out targets and shooting at the ranges the exercise allowed............"
With regard to Cope India
"..............Publicly, senior USAF officers generalised about what had happened. "What we faced were superior numbers, and an IAF pilot who was very proficient in his aircraft and smart on tactics. That combination was tough for us to overcome," said Colonel Greg Neubeck, exercise director and deputy commander of the 3rd Wing's Operations Group.
“From what we've seen in the last two weeks is, the IAF can stand toe-to-toe with best AF in the world. I pity the pilot who has to face the IAF and chances the day to underestimate him; because he won't be going home. The (Indian) pilots are as aggressive as our pilots. They are excellent aviators; they work very hard at mission planning; they try to get as much out of a mission or sortie as possible, just like us. From one fighter pilot to another, there's really not that much difference in how we prepare for a mission and what we want to get out of it.”
Training
While the USAF's warm remarks about the parity between Indian and US pilots seemed superficially generous, they may not have been generous enough. All the evidence from Cope India suggests that the Indian pilots might actually be better trained and better skilled than their USAF counterparts, and not merely their equals.
This should have come as no surprise to the USAF, since the Indian Air Force has a long and proud history, has been to war (against a 'quality opponent' four times since 1945) and maintains a high state of operational readiness, ready to react should tension with Pakistan or China explode into conflict. And because of this conflict, and because of the risk of war, the IAF is well-equipped and generously funded. Indian pilots actually fly almost twice as many hours per month as their USAF counterparts. Moreover, much more of that flying is undertaken under operational conditions, and Indian pilots train against other Indian pilots who don't try to simulate an inferior threat, but who simply do their best to win. In effect, Indian pilots train against the best, reasoning that lesser opponents will pose less of a problem if you can beat the finest!
By comparison, the way in which the USAF trains against a 'Red air' threat is rather less 'challenging'.
For many years the USAF has assumed that its fighters and fighter pilots are more capable than enemy aircraft and aircrew, and so in order to achieve 'realism' the US Air Force has simulated enemy capability by using 'enemy' forces ('Red Air') who deliberately use the tactics of 'real-world' threat air forces, and who operate under rules that intentionally constrain their combat capability.
After Cope India, shocked USAF pilots admitted that they had problems with the Indian simulated active missile threat because they had not routinely trained against launch-and-leave threats. They also admitted that they had underestimated the training and tactics of the Indian pilots.
A senior USAF officer said that: "The Air Force is re-examining, from what I can understand, our concept of red air and how we might be able to provide red air to our fighter forces so that we get [the best] training we can afford." The USAF's exercise leader admitted that the USAF needed to "take off the handcuffs that we put on our red air training aids and allow them to be more aggressive and make the red air tougher than we have in the past."
The Indian Air Force report into the exercise was never intended for publication, but details have become known. The document was reportedly highly critical of its USAF adversaries. The Indian aviation magazine 'Vayu' reported that the report had noted a number of weaknesses in the USAF pilots, including an 'absence of initiative', 'blind obedience to rehearsed scenarios', and a 'lack of adaptability'.
Tactics
Though training plays a part in air combat success, tactics are equally important. During Cope India, the USAF found itself saddled with tactics that were ineffective, and facing an enemy whose tactical flexibility proved hard to counter.
Major Mark A. Snowden, the 3rd Wing's chief of air-to-air tactics and one of the USAF pilots who participated in Cope India, later spoke admiringly about the way in which Indian Air Force planners never repeated failed tactics and praised their ability to rapidly change tactics as new opportunities became available.
“The outcome of the exercise boils down to the fact that they ran tactics that were more advanced than we expected. They could come up with a game plan, but if it wasn't working they would call an audible and change tactics in flight. They were adept at mixing things up and never provided the same tactical 'look'. They would analyze what we were doing and then try something else. They weren't afraid to bring the strikers in high or low. They would move them around so that we could never anticipate from day to day what we were going to see.”
By comparison, the USAF failed to surprise the Indians, relying on the simple expedient of putting up a 'wall' of four F-15s between the enemy and the target. This is a tactic that has proved useful against other adversaries, but it relies on the use of long-range missiles with greater reach than those employed by the enemy - and this is something the USAF could not rely on in Cope India.
“We didn't have the beyond-visual-range shot or the numerical advantage.” Stockwell said. “Eventually we were just worn down by the numbers. They were very smart about it. Their goal was to get to a target area, engage the target and then withdraw without prolonging the fight. If there were a couple of Eagles still alive away from the target area, they would keep them pinned in, get done with the target and then egress with all their forces. All their aircraft seemed to be capable of breaking out targets and shooting at the ranges the exercise allowed............"
Guest
Posts: n/a
I'd still put my money on USAF vs. IAF where things actually go 'boom.'
But that's just me.........
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Back in '95(?), at a Cope Tiger in Thailand, I was controlling 'Red Air' when one of my guys made the call of "Kill, F-15, blah, blah, blah" from a RNZAF A-4 came across. Kind of hard to explain that one too. But it was great to see a humbled Eagle driver at the bar for once!
But that's just me.........
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Back in '95(?), at a Cope Tiger in Thailand, I was controlling 'Red Air' when one of my guys made the call of "Kill, F-15, blah, blah, blah" from a RNZAF A-4 came across. Kind of hard to explain that one too. But it was great to see a humbled Eagle driver at the bar for once!
Last edited by brickhistory; 22nd Dec 2005 at 12:26.
Some observations....
Since when does a fighter pilot say the other guy is the best fighter pilot in the world? If I hear that....everything else following that is going to be a lie too.
When you begin to believe your own propaganda....you are going to get yer ass kicked!
One of the rules of combat...."Never...Never....Never...under-estimate your enemies ability!"
You fight the way you are trained.
The US Army did away with scripted training exercises a long time ago....units go to Fort Irwin and engage in free flowing combat exercises....sometimes they beat the agressors...sometimes they do not. You learn from getting your ass kicked in training.
Equipment is only one part of the equation....guts and smarts are the other parts.
You reckon years of thinking you are the best....might not measure up to trying to be the best? Pride goes before a fall... as I was taught a long time ago.
Since when does a fighter pilot say the other guy is the best fighter pilot in the world? If I hear that....everything else following that is going to be a lie too.
When you begin to believe your own propaganda....you are going to get yer ass kicked!
One of the rules of combat...."Never...Never....Never...under-estimate your enemies ability!"
You fight the way you are trained.
The US Army did away with scripted training exercises a long time ago....units go to Fort Irwin and engage in free flowing combat exercises....sometimes they beat the agressors...sometimes they do not. You learn from getting your ass kicked in training.
Equipment is only one part of the equation....guts and smarts are the other parts.
You reckon years of thinking you are the best....might not measure up to trying to be the best? Pride goes before a fall... as I was taught a long time ago.
I'matightbastard
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,747
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I pity the pilot who has to face the IAF and chances the day to underestimate him; because he won't be going home.
When you begin to believe your own propaganda....you are going to get yer ass kicked!
One of the rules of combat...."Never...Never....Never...under-estimate your enemies ability!"
One of the rules of combat...."Never...Never....Never...under-estimate your enemies ability!"
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just to make it clear - NONE of the comments that were made about the skill of the Indian Air Force pilots came from anybody on the Indian side. All comments were picked up from the US news media and THEN circulated in the Indian media.
The IAF pilots I have talked to (including Mirage 2000/Mig 29/Jaguar/Mig-23/27 pilots) are embarrassed and dismayed by all this. They think it paints a false picture in many ways - and dont want to talk about it other than saying that they get paid to do a job.
I guess we come from a tradition (forced on us or otherwise!) of British reticence rather than American extroversion!
Worf
The IAF pilots I have talked to (including Mirage 2000/Mig 29/Jaguar/Mig-23/27 pilots) are embarrassed and dismayed by all this. They think it paints a false picture in many ways - and dont want to talk about it other than saying that they get paid to do a job.
I guess we come from a tradition (forced on us or otherwise!) of British reticence rather than American extroversion!
Worf
it's yet another job that can be outsourced 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thursday the 19th of February 2004 will mark the day when the undisputed king of air superiority had to surrender its thirty-year crown to a newcomer. It happened over the skies of Windermere, in the scenic English Lake District. Two Eurofighter Typhoon twin-seaters were on the first RAF formation training flight from Warton Aerodrome when they were bounced from the eight o'clock by a couple of F-15Es belonging to the USAFE's 48th TFW, probably the most formidable and experienced combat unit in the European theatre. The Typhoon crew did not seem to be intimidated and with two rapid counters ended up on the F-15 tail, comfortably gunning the trailing one, who was in full afterburner, wings rocking and wondering what had happened.
It is fair to expect that the most surprised by this first encounter result would be the F15 crew, used to dominate the skies since the mid-seventies and with an exchange ratio record of 101 wins to zero losses, and a bunch of die-hard Eurofighter critics without much knowledge of the new fighter air combat capabilities. It is understandable if the RAF rookies would also show their surprise at the outcome, as one does not expect to win an air engagement on the first training sortie with a brand new machine against one of the best combat units in the world, riding what up to now has been the best fighter in history.
But that is history now!
Those definitely not surprised by what the events over the Lake District skies signify are the top echelon in the Air Combat Command, the Chief of Staff and the RAND Corp. analysts and boffins. They have been saying for years that the F-15 is no match to the new generation of European fighters and even to the Su-35 Flanker. They know what they say: their operational analyses studies and other simulated evaluations-as indeed have ours, both at the industry and government level-have shown that the F-15 is unable to gain air superiority against Eurofighter Typhoon. Now they have the first real indication that their worries were not unjustified and that the F/A-22 was the right choice, if they want to maintain the air superiority also in the future.
It is fair to expect that the most surprised by this first encounter result would be the F15 crew, used to dominate the skies since the mid-seventies and with an exchange ratio record of 101 wins to zero losses, and a bunch of die-hard Eurofighter critics without much knowledge of the new fighter air combat capabilities. It is understandable if the RAF rookies would also show their surprise at the outcome, as one does not expect to win an air engagement on the first training sortie with a brand new machine against one of the best combat units in the world, riding what up to now has been the best fighter in history.
But that is history now!
Those definitely not surprised by what the events over the Lake District skies signify are the top echelon in the Air Combat Command, the Chief of Staff and the RAND Corp. analysts and boffins. They have been saying for years that the F-15 is no match to the new generation of European fighters and even to the Su-35 Flanker. They know what they say: their operational analyses studies and other simulated evaluations-as indeed have ours, both at the industry and government level-have shown that the F-15 is unable to gain air superiority against Eurofighter Typhoon. Now they have the first real indication that their worries were not unjustified and that the F/A-22 was the right choice, if they want to maintain the air superiority also in the future.
But nevertheless it's a great story
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nice story - Only problem is that we only have a few Eurofrighteners at present and the USAF probably have more F-15's sat in the desert let alone in squadron service !
I guess with the Saudi's taking a load of the RAF's it will save RAF Squadrons deploying to the Middle East sandpit.
I guess with the Saudi's taking a load of the RAF's it will save RAF Squadrons deploying to the Middle East sandpit.
Typical bolleaux from the BBC. WHen are they going to hire a defence reporter who knows how to qualify a story?
I don't think that there are many who would dispute that the Eurofighter should be kicking the butt of any F-15E (clearly though, the BBC does not know the difference between the F-15 Eagle and the F-15E Strike Eagle, the latter of which is not the 'undisputed king of air superiority', but is probably the undisputed king of putting iron on target).
Despite this being and old, old story, I'll give you a few quotes from a Strike Eagle mate (flying out of Lakenheath at the time) to add balance:
I don't think that there are many who would dispute that the Eurofighter should be kicking the butt of any F-15E (clearly though, the BBC does not know the difference between the F-15 Eagle and the F-15E Strike Eagle, the latter of which is not the 'undisputed king of air superiority', but is probably the undisputed king of putting iron on target).
Despite this being and old, old story, I'll give you a few quotes from a Strike Eagle mate (flying out of Lakenheath at the time) to add balance:
Best fighter in the world? I love my aircraft, but I don't even regard it as the best fighter in the world (not for WVR fights). This reporter is a sensationalist tool. If the Strike Eagles were visual I guarantee you that they had already locked on and fired. This occurred under a UK program called Fighting Edge which says that anyone squawking Mode 1-11 agrees to be targeted by any other aircraft - low level or medium altitude. Fighting Edge has training rules which are almost identical to 11-214 A/A training rules, one of which calls for limiting maneuvering (no more than 180 degrees of turn) for any Target of Opportunity attacks. By virtue of bragging (able to maneuver to the F-15E's six o'clock), the Brits have openly admitted to breaking Fighting Edge training rules. Not too smart.
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Far far away
Age: 53
Posts: 715
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The best pilots in the world probably fly 747-400s, or some other large airliner. The best weapons platform operators in the world? - Probably the Israelis...
US F-15 pilots the best? no
US F-15 pilots the best? no