Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

RAF Hercules was shot down - Reid

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

RAF Hercules was shot down - Reid

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9th Dec 2005, 02:28
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Oxfordshire
Age: 54
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Considering the platform, it's capabilities, and it's mission, what CAN be done?

A Herc can't run away quickly, is too big to be stealthy, and can't carry out most of it's ops from high altitude.

What's left?
glum is offline  
Old 9th Dec 2005, 05:33
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: exeter
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The use of foam filled tanks could have helped. Flying low with flight deck armour is false security as the biggest target is a fuel filled alley wing!!
Why no foam??? Cost??
All the USAF SF aircraft have it fitted, even the choppers!!
(They have even found rounds in the tanks when later servicing them)

I did raise the subject when I served with 'Them'.

All so silly and such a waste as many of us always said fuel tanks where a massive risk!!

Might not have been small / medium arms fire and could have been a missile in which case your f***ed!
c130airman is offline  
Old 9th Dec 2005, 07:03
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: London
Posts: 1,256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maybe better threat assessment. Routes that have the most probability of small arms fire - fly high, missiles- fly low.

Would expect small arms a greater threat in Iraq.
4Greens is offline  
Old 9th Dec 2005, 08:01
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
May the crew RIP.


The Sun's report on it today was sickening.
speeddial is offline  
Old 9th Dec 2005, 11:56
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There is a balance to be made. Certainly in Vietnam transport aircraft were lost due to small arms fire taking out the pilot and the Huey crews used body armour. Without wishing to turn the thing into an armoured bathtub there must be a need for some kind of personnal protection to pilots operating at low altitude.
As regards higher levels - in the case of the Vietnam war the U.S aircraft were operating against a sophisticated air defence network with the ability to fix damage sustained quite quickly.
Over Iraq however I guess the problem is MANPADS and AAA fire
which to some degree altitude cannot stop but can allow thinking time in which to react. The sad thing is that it's war zone and no matter what reports are done into it - it won't bring back the crew or indeed get rid of the chances of it happening again.
RileyDove is offline  
Old 9th Dec 2005, 15:38
  #26 (permalink)  

 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Bourton-on-the-Water
Posts: 1,019
Received 18 Likes on 8 Posts
I’m surprised to find myself saying this, but I do believe that the RAF and the MoD are to be congratulated on their handling of this very sensitive BoI. I have studied the published Findings, and both organisations seem to have made sterling efforts to publish everything they possibly could, apparently only censoring stuff that is genuinely operationally sensitive. Of course, in a free democracy, we should expect nothing less. But I have to say that their openness came as a welcome surprise to this ancient, and occasionally jaundiced, aviation observer.

I didn’t know any of the people involved, but I almost feel as if I do because I have been involved on the periphery since they died in January. Indeed, at the memorial flypast at RIAT, I was privileged to have been able to quote the very moving words of OC Lyneham. What does seem clear is that they were truly a top bunch - and I believe that the openness displayed by their Service does them and the Service nothing but credit.

We are surely all blessed to have served alongside, or been served by, such outstanding people.
airsound is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2005, 06:21
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Not Ardua enough
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I understand one of the crew was decorated posthumously too, for a previous mission.

Note to :Safeware

Without wshing to divert from this thread, An apology, My experience is not as current as yours. I had no knowledge of a Mod to the OSB.
ARINC is offline  
Old 10th Dec 2005, 12:08
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: northside
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A question for the C130, chinook guys - When you are flying through the SA threat band do you employ the "Wells Manoeuvre"?
southside is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2005, 18:34
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Oxford
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not a C130 or a Chinook guy. Never heard of the 'Wells Manoeuvre', but I guess as a slow mover (initially) we have SOP's for the SA band to minimise the timespent there.

RIP Guys, you will be missed..
Roguedent is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2005, 19:00
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Wiltshire
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Never heard of the Wells maoeuvre but you are unlikely to get discussion on present tactics on an open forum.
oldfella is offline  
Old 11th Dec 2005, 20:10
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Deepest Oxfordshire
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fighting 47th

Dear all

Long since 'departed the fix', but I knew several of the crew and I wish them all that they would have wished themselves in their long sleep - and the very best to those they left behind.

No words of mine could possibly do them justice.

Nili nomen roboris omen

May your God bless you, keep you and give you peace.

Gadget
Captain Gadget is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2005, 10:33
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Near the coast
Posts: 2,373
Received 571 Likes on 160 Posts
vecvec

BEAD WINDOW DUMB-ASS.
I don't think we really need to discuss anything of the kind on an open forum do we!
BV
Bob Viking is online now  
Old 12th Dec 2005, 10:47
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: northside
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For those of you who want to know what BEADWINDOW means.


However, if you want to learn more about how to fly your aircraft when operating inside a SA threat band you will be able to find all the tactics you need here
southside is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2005, 12:20
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Near the coast
Posts: 2,373
Received 571 Likes on 160 Posts
Southside

I see Vecvec had the sense to remove his post. Are you two related/the same person. You are both equally irritating at times!
BV
Bob Viking is online now  
Old 12th Dec 2005, 12:41
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: East Sussex
Posts: 1,077
Received 18 Likes on 8 Posts
That's being polite.

At best, Southside and VecVecthingy are a couple of walter mitty types (or maybe one sad spotter using 2 usernames from the comfort of his bedroom...)

At worst, a very irresponsible SAC/rating who has twocked some SOPs or FRCs from his bosses' desk.

Training Risky is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2005, 12:59
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Falmouth
Posts: 1,651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
twocked?

whats that mean?
vecvechookattack is offline  
Old 12th Dec 2005, 13:10
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: East Sussex
Posts: 1,077
Received 18 Likes on 8 Posts
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Twocked

Everything that an oxygen thief needs to know about modern diction...
Training Risky is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.