Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

9/11 Not as it seems??

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

9/11 Not as it seems??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 27th Jun 2005, 14:27
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Glowcesestershiiiire
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
9/11 Not as it seems??

Take a look at this..........

http://www.pentagonstrike.co.uk/flash.htm#Main
k1rb5 is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2005, 14:41
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,290
Received 518 Likes on 216 Posts
I have a dear friend that was involved in the crime scene search there....did some of the bagging and tagging of body parts and other evidence. I will forward this to him for his comment....and let you know what he has to say about it.

He has never said anything to suggest other than the account as published in the 911 commission report.

Nice video though that raises good questions.

One question I ask.....if buildings do not eat airplanes as they suggest...we have video of the two airplanes striking the WTC buildings...particularly the second aircraft. Did not the WTC building eat those two as well?

The Pentagon burned for two days....seems like a pretty hot and large fire....could it have been caused by the missing 5300 gallons of fuel?

If you are suicidal....would you be able to "fly" an airplane in a manner that non-suicidal pilots would not? Even if you were not a true pilot?

Conspiracies.....I love'em!
SASless is online now  
Old 27th Jun 2005, 14:43
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: at the end of the bar
Posts: 484
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Oh god, not that again. Obviously written by someone who hasn't seen what happens when you crash an aluminium tube into the ground at high speed
XV277 is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2005, 15:22
  #4 (permalink)  
Suspicion breeds confidence
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Gibraltar
Posts: 2,405
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
Its really quite simple, if it wasn't the 757 as explained by the report, where is that a/c and the people on it? It must be low on fuel by now. IIRC it hit a helo on a landing pad killing a general and its crew who had just touched down.
Navaleye is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2005, 16:08
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: The Wonderful Midlands
Age: 53
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This video of an F4 being propelled into a concrete wall at the Sandia National Laboratories test site will give you conspiracy thoerists some idea of what happens to an aircraft when it hits something solid at high speed.

How strange. A concrete wall EATS a plane?!

Last edited by The Rocket; 27th Jun 2005 at 22:51.
The Rocket is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2005, 17:33
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: door or ramp, don't mind.
Posts: 961
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Conspiracies.....I love'em!
So does Elvis. Told me so only the other day.
Talking Radalt is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2005, 18:02
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,829
Received 275 Likes on 111 Posts
Uh-huh............................
BEagle is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2005, 18:42
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: the gutter
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
K1rb5 and The Rocket

Two very good links there. Even Mrs Exleckie thought so.

Conspiracy theories are great. Like the plane crash at Boscombe Down in the 90s.
Yeah right!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Makes you wonder though
exleckie is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2005, 19:45
  #9 (permalink)  

Purveyor of Egg Liqueur to Lucifer
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Alles über die platz
Posts: 4,694
Received 38 Likes on 24 Posts
What can we expect from a country where 95% of those surveyed thought that Joan of Arc was Noahs wife!


Boscombe! Now why was it that I was diverted to 'top cover' the incident, whilst on a GH sortie on the plain?

I wonder how a conspiracy starts?


SS
SilsoeSid is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2005, 20:25
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: the gutter
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hmmmmmmmmm, conspiracy, conspiracy.

I was based at Boscombe when said incident occurred. Okay, I was deployed at the the time and the first I knew of this "incident" was an article in the Times.

Having spoken to many people who were on duty at the time of said "incident", there does appear to be many factors which point to nothing more than normal activities / events which when put together in a 2x2=5 fashion do make an interesting story indeed.

Some of the conspiracy theory websites do come up with some great theories but quite honestly, are complete and utter nonsense.

But then again Silsoe, if you were called to provide top cover................................................

Is the truth really out there????????
exleckie is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2005, 21:25
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Oxford
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nice theory, I will just go ask R2D2 and Chewbacca if they have seen the Millenium Falcon recently!!

I hear all those people on the jet all now live on the moon.
Roguedent is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2005, 22:49
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 887
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I haven't studied the walls of the Pentagon but I doubt that they are as solid as the one that the F-4 crashed into, and I doubt that they would 'eat' a B757 as effectively.
Zoom is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2005, 22:58
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,290
Received 518 Likes on 216 Posts
One of the flukes of this incident....is the portion of the Pentagon that got hit had just recently been given an upgrade to the structure and exterior to enhance its ability to withstand an attack. The windows were blast proof and the exterior wall had been improved to withstand bomb blasts.
SASless is online now  
Old 27th Jun 2005, 23:04
  #14 (permalink)  
Registered User **
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: London
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nice video though that raises good questions.
One of the flukes of this incident....
You'll get there SASless - keep researching and you'll get there.
Selac66 is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2005, 23:07
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,290
Received 518 Likes on 216 Posts
http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon...tos/index.html

Shows the rest of the photos that were left out of the video....clearly shows aircraft parts inside and outside the building.
SASless is online now  
Old 27th Jun 2005, 23:09
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: England
Posts: 964
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All of you with the 'yeah right' approach make me laugh. You seem to come to a conclusion without examining the evidence. The angle of impact, the trajectory through the building, the lack of any witness marks and the lack of any public viewing of the camera tapes (thought they would make prime time viewing to whip up the coilition into a frenzy of retaliation), wake up folks! Some of you who have said 'yeah right' probably dont believe in Jesus and God because there is no proof. Or maybe those of you that did say 'yeah right' do believe in Jesus and God because its ok for faith to be blind and you believe it because you were all told it was so. er! oh oh! middle America mm! wonder which side you belong to?

Fact is would an ambitious administration orchestrate something that would result in almost absolute power with the main player's private companies making hundreds of millions of dollars each? mmm, need to ponder on this for a while.

They fooled us into thinking man was sent to the moon, why do you think, they think, they cant pull this one off?

Not a conspiracy theorist, i just like empirical data. There is no aircraft accident investigator out there that would come to the conclusion that an aircraft (certainly a 757) impacted with that building. Handy how the well informed terrorist went for the relitively empty part of the building (section 1) that was being refurbished, or was it a 1 in 5 chance they hit that part and not one of the busier sections?? God rest all the souls of those who perished and i hope if there is a god he punishes those responsible.

SASless
but which type of aircraft parts?? are they 757 parts??
Tigs2 is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2005, 23:19
  #17 (permalink)  

Not enough $$$ ...
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
... deleted after reading the info on the link provided by SASless.

Last edited by wishtobflying; 27th Jun 2005 at 23:54.
wishtobflying is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2005, 23:19
  #18 (permalink)  
Registered User **
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: London
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This is worth a look.

This thread may be stopped for lack of aviation relevance because this building wasn't hit by an aircraft.

http://www.911research.com/wtc/evide.../wtc_7_cbs.mpg
Selac66 is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2005, 23:26
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Downeast
Age: 75
Posts: 18,290
Received 518 Likes on 216 Posts
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/pages/..._evidence.html

Convinces me that it was a 757......
SASless is online now  
Old 28th Jun 2005, 00:28
  #20 (permalink)  
Registered User **
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: London
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
There's plenty of stuff out there. Everyone should have a look and make up their own minds.

http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/911/bra.../pentagon.html
http://www.freedomfiles.org/war/pentagon.htm
http://77debris.batcave.net/AA.html
Selac66 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.