Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Military Aviation
Reload this Page >

Petition for the abolition of Crossbows

Wikiposts
Search
Military Aviation A forum for the professionals who fly military hardware. Also for the backroom boys and girls who support the flying and maintain the equipment, and without whom nothing would ever leave the ground. All armies, navies and air forces of the world equally welcome here.

Petition for the abolition of Crossbows

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4th Feb 2005, 15:05
  #21 (permalink)  
crossbow
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
sanctimonious ... Blimey no.... Ivebeen in the dwang more times than I care to remember and the last time last my flying cat for 2 weeks... !!! Didn't like that 1. No Im not santicmonious. I'm a bloomin top bloke who loves flyin' and is a chamion Uckers god...but not sanctimonious. Thanks for asking anyway.
 
Old 4th Feb 2005, 15:43
  #22 (permalink)  
Roghead
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I also find some of Crossbow's contributions to these Forums odd at best, contentious certainly and invariably poorly presented, shallow and displaying unconvincing logic - so he must be a TP then
Seriously, however, should his Warton location be Flt Ops and his inferrence is that he is a current aviator, then the crew room (if it survived the rebuilding) must surely be a better place for banter and the usual aircrew exchange of ideas than the place it had descended into by 2001.
Keep up the good work, old son, both these Forums and Flt Ops need input such as yours.
 
Old 4th Feb 2005, 16:07
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 339
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just going back a few posts to Mr Working Hard. This is a plea to your better nature, but why oh why did you perpetuate the Low Flying thread with ridiculous suggestions and very obvious questions if, as you claim, you are ex mil. You are a pilot in civvy street, were you a mil pilot?? I would have thought someone who had served with her Majesty's finest would not have to ask inflammatory questions on a public forum about the very contentious issue of low flying? Maybe I am being stupid but it just doesnt add up.

I dont think we should get worked up about Crossbow, (s)he makes some valid points but also can be a little obnoxious at times, but then again cant we all? The combination of a bad day, stress etc etc can make some posts on this forum a little heated and I am sure that on reflection (as I do sometimes) we may wish to reconsider our posts.

If you are a wind up merchant crossbow you are then you are probably loving this attention so continue to add a little ray of sunshine in our lives..............

Regards

DS
PPRuNeUser0172 is offline  
Old 4th Feb 2005, 16:18
  #24 (permalink)  
crossbow
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
No guys. Im not a wind up merchant but I do like to discuss the more contentious issues. Such as Low Flying. Why? well I am a real fan of Low flying. I love it. Its fab, great fun and its one of the true sorties where I find the more you put into the planning phase and the execution then the more you get out of the sortie. However, I have it on very good authority that we (the armed forces) will soon have the UKLFS removed. Now, I don't think thats a good decision.In fact its an awful decision. BUT its not me you have to persuade. Its mrs treehugger and her MP. Cos they are the ones knocking at the door of Buff and demanding that the RAF stop whazzing over her house at midnight and scaring the horses. Now I have had the misfortune to be the subject of a low flying complaint when the formation i was leading (apparently) disturbed and subsequently killed a horse (Thankfully I was above 2000' and had the radar and radio evidence to prove it). I have also been witness to a very good friend who was Court martialled for unauthorised Low Flying (prob his own fault but it still hurts to see yr mate go down).
And so whilst I like a good manly discussion on the affairs which affect Military aviators, I also enjoy asking the odd awkward question. One of which caused a lot of anxiety. That question still remains as there is only one guy on here who has had the guts to try and form a reply. The rest of you just rant and rave and swear at me for having the audacity to ask such a question.
And so the question remains (for you all except one guy)
Why should we low fly in the UK when our area of Operations is in the Gulf? Thats the question Mrs Treehugger and her MP are asking. So serious answers only please.
 
Old 4th Feb 2005, 16:33
  #25 (permalink)  
Roghead
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Now I may have given a form of qualified support to you Crossbow, but you can't go hi-jacking other people's threads (however worthwhile the LFS issue may be). Suggest you repost your last on the appropriate thread (yours as it happens)
I do agree with you, however, that we need to come up with arguments FOR the continuance of low flying training in the UK which will convince the right people.
 
Old 4th Feb 2005, 16:46
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: I have a home where the Junglies roam.
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Contradiction is just the automatic gainsaying of any statement the other person makes".
No it isn't.
dmanton300 is offline  
Old 4th Feb 2005, 16:47
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: England
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think this might explain a few things concerning our 'new SilsoeSid'.

Trolls
Eagle 270 is offline  
Old 4th Feb 2005, 17:54
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Under the clouds now
Age: 86
Posts: 2,506
Received 15 Likes on 12 Posts
Pinnoccio and Walter Mitty spring to mind when describing a tosser like Xbow
brakedwell is offline  
Old 4th Feb 2005, 18:26
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: wilts
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Unfortunatly I believe in free speech so instead of the abolition of crossbow how about the retrospectve abortion. If nobody goes for that we could also go for neutering to avoid mini crossbows entering decent society.
lineslime is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2005, 11:12
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: England
Posts: 362
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Somebody please suggest exactly WHERE the entire fast-jet, rotary and SF herc fleets can TRAIN at low flying outside the UK. Then I'll give you reasons why your choice is impractical. Any takers? Crossbow?
Monty77 is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2005, 12:08
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Under the clouds now
Age: 86
Posts: 2,506
Received 15 Likes on 12 Posts
lineslime
No need to neuter crossbow, everything he does and says is off target.
brakedwell is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2005, 15:14
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 790
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Crossbow - could you please actually explain what you fly - it's just some of the points you made in your last post don't seem to add up..??

Cheers

LC
Lafyar Cokov is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2005, 15:42
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Under the clouds now
Age: 86
Posts: 2,506
Received 15 Likes on 12 Posts
Like being at Liverpool University before joining the RAF in 1976? That would make crossbow at least 51 years old. He implies that he is flying Typhoons out of Warton and would go back to Jaguars if the third tranche is canned. As I said before, both Pinnoccio and Walter Mitty spring to mind!
What a plonker!!!
brakedwell is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2005, 15:52
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 1,777
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Eagle 270 - brilliant link. Describes crossbow to a tee. Bit in there for PPP, to decide whether or not he agrees that crossbow is an internet troll. I'm sure Eagle 270 won't mind my repeating his link to reinforce many of our feelings about this individual. Everyone should read it:

http://members.aol.com/intwg/trolls.htm

crossbow - troll alert...
FJJP is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2005, 15:59
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Norwich, UK
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If indeed he is an internet troll, surely this post is giving him the attention, and spreading the ill-feeling, which he ultimately set out to achieve?

I suggest not continuing this thread and whenever he posts totally ignore them and don't comment on any of the points made.

(Should you be 100& true in what you say x-bow, I take it all back mate)
joe2812 is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2005, 16:08
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Strasbourg and hotter places
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Brakedwell

You got that too huh ? Everyone knows that RAF officers of that age group are mature, experienced, debonair, skilful and far too rich to bother flying any more. Whereas Crossbow is, well, not......

Trolls are just too stupid to keep it going for long, but I have to admit some of them are fun.
Pilgrim101 is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2005, 20:01
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Wiltshire
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As a newcomer to posting on this site, but having read in over quite some time, I wait to be slagged off.

I may not agree with all that Crossbow goes on about but it is an open forum and he has as much right to comment as anyone else. His comments or observations may be out of phase with the majority. His posts may be contovertial or even in bad taste but he has the right to post. He does not have the right to be
(h)(r)eard.

If you are offended, just ignore it. Too often in the past an interesting thread has gone off the way resulting in the schoolboy arguments of mine is bigger, better, lower, faster, than yours.

He has the right to his opinions. Everyone else has the right to ignore them.
oldfella is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2005, 21:43
  #38 (permalink)  
crossbow
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
The rest of you just rant and rave and swear at me for having the audacity to ask such a question.



come on people. Lets get some serious discussion going here rather than threats, intimidation and ranting and raving....so far the answer to the question - why should we low fly in the uk has been:

1. cos your a ********
2. winker
3. cos we want 2

Im not as old as that but I am over 45

anyway, if no one can come up with a reason then Im afraid we will have to wave goodbye to the UKLFS. If you cannot form a decent argument then that will be the end of it
 
Old 5th Feb 2005, 22:01
  #39 (permalink)  

Short Blunt Shock
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What, like you have any say in the matter, crossbow?

If you don't know the reason why we low fly, you are not who you claim to be, and would not understand if someone could be bothered explaining it to you.

Im not as old as that but I am over 45
...months, perhaps.

16B
16 blades is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2005, 22:05
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Over There
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So what we need here is some sort of e-Billy Goat Gruff. Not up to the job myself, but I'm sure someone can do it!

crossbow:

1. cos your a ********
2. winker
3. cos we want 2
There's are threads for it out there (although the JHC one has lots of banter and not much reasoning) and a few people have given you good reasons for LF being necessary. You're doing a good job of Devil's Advocate though, and I'm beginning to wonder if you have a point - we in the Military know exactly why we need to low fly, but MPs aren't in the Military, and nor are the general public, so possibly we do need to explain this to them as if they're very very stupid.

None of which stops you from being a ******** or a winker if you so wish.

BCH
Big Cat Handler is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.