Pax sue Boeing after DXB Accident
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: New Delhi, India
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Pax sue Boeing after DXB Accident
From the main thread
Pax sue Boeing in DXB crash
More than a dozen passengers aboard an Emirates airline flight that crashed in August 2016 sued plane-maker Boeing on Tuesday in Cook County Circuit Court, blaming an allegedly defective switch.
The Boeing 777-300 flight was headed to Dubai, United Arab Emirates, from India.
All 300 people aboard Emirates Flight EK 521 survived the crash-landing in Dubai, scrambling down emergency slides before flames consumed the plane, but one firefighter was killed battling the blaze. It was the worst crash in the airline's history.
The lawsuit alleges, among other problems, that the aircraft's system prevented the operation of a switch at a critical moment and that the plane didn't provide any warning to the crew that the switch wasn't working.
The plaintiffs, who are residents of the United Kingdom, Switzerland, the UAE and Turkey, suffered serious physical and psychological injuries that will result in future medical bills and lost earnings, the lawsuit says.
Passengers sue Boeing in Cook County court over worst crash in Emirates history - Chicago Tribune
Pax sue Boeing in DXB crash
More than a dozen passengers aboard an Emirates airline flight that crashed in August 2016 sued plane-maker Boeing on Tuesday in Cook County Circuit Court, blaming an allegedly defective switch.
The Boeing 777-300 flight was headed to Dubai, United Arab Emirates, from India.
All 300 people aboard Emirates Flight EK 521 survived the crash-landing in Dubai, scrambling down emergency slides before flames consumed the plane, but one firefighter was killed battling the blaze. It was the worst crash in the airline's history.
The lawsuit alleges, among other problems, that the aircraft's system prevented the operation of a switch at a critical moment and that the plane didn't provide any warning to the crew that the switch wasn't working.
The plaintiffs, who are residents of the United Kingdom, Switzerland, the UAE and Turkey, suffered serious physical and psychological injuries that will result in future medical bills and lost earnings, the lawsuit says.
Passengers sue Boeing in Cook County court over worst crash in Emirates history - Chicago Tribune
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: hotels all over the globe
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This autoflight specific, is covered in the operational manuals and known to B777 operators and aviators, for me, the fact that many scape slides did not deploy properly or not held in place after deployment is even more concerning, as for that part, we aviators and operators are not properly warned about.
Slide limitations, not tested with winds above 25kt, or other specifics that we are not aware, this is for me a better reason for a law suit.
Slide limitations, not tested with winds above 25kt, or other specifics that we are not aware, this is for me a better reason for a law suit.
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: The Sandbox
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ek have left themselves wide open for years by maintaining very detailed training records on pilots, often with negative comments.
This lawsuit does not relate to the pilots but the next one will.
Many of our management pilots from training and fleet (egt) like their Seattle and orlando flights.
It would be a nice surprise if they were served with court papers as they exited the airport.
This lawsuit does not relate to the pilots but the next one will.
Many of our management pilots from training and fleet (egt) like their Seattle and orlando flights.
It would be a nice surprise if they were served with court papers as they exited the airport.
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Dubai
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not so much at our outfit, ricfly744.
Having skippered this plane a few years now, this was news to me at the time of the accident. As it probably was for most of my brethren (and please don't all chime in with 'yeah, but you gotta push and aviate, sucker!' It's getting old. Fast. Stating the obvious does not negate the fact).
Our friendly neighbors in the capital have had this in their manual since get-go, so probably not applicable to them.
But deffo applicable to us.
Having skippered this plane a few years now, this was news to me at the time of the accident. As it probably was for most of my brethren (and please don't all chime in with 'yeah, but you gotta push and aviate, sucker!' It's getting old. Fast. Stating the obvious does not negate the fact).
Our friendly neighbors in the capital have had this in their manual since get-go, so probably not applicable to them.
But deffo applicable to us.
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Permanent JET LAGGG
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not so much at our outfit, ricfly744.
Having skippered this plane a few years now, this was news to me at the time of the accident. As it probably was for most of my brethren (and please don't all chime in with 'yeah, but you gotta push and aviate, sucker!' It's getting old. Fast. Stating the obvious does not negate the fact).
Our friendly neighbors in the capital have had this in their manual since get-go, so probably not applicable to them.
But deffo applicable to us.
Having skippered this plane a few years now, this was news to me at the time of the accident. As it probably was for most of my brethren (and please don't all chime in with 'yeah, but you gotta push and aviate, sucker!' It's getting old. Fast. Stating the obvious does not negate the fact).
Our friendly neighbors in the capital have had this in their manual since get-go, so probably not applicable to them.
But deffo applicable to us.
Just because this was "news to you" doesn't mean it wasn't in the manual. Yes it was. It's always been in the manual.
CC: and please don't all chime in with 'yeah, but you gotta push and aviate, sucker!' It's getting old. Fast. Stating the obvious does not negate the fact).
So what do you want us/them to state?
So what do you want us/them to state?
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Permanent JET LAGGG
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That's for you as PF/PM to understand and implement, and it's written for the lawyers.
Do you seriously need educated on how our manuals are produced?
And you utterly misquoted me.
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Dubai
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
CC & CDRW:
It's quite simple, really. How about like the chaps down south has written in their FCOM: something like 'Warning: TOGA switches are inhibited if main gear has touched down'.
I saw it in their manual after the accident, but do not have the exact wording.
We have:
FCOM NP.21.56:
At the same time:
push the TO/GA switch
call FLAPS 20.
Verify:
the rotation to go-around attitude
that the thrust increases.
FCOM 11.31.31:
Missed Approach
A missed approach is accomplished by selection of either TOGA switch. The
following features are available: .......
So, I say again, as I did this morning; it would have been nice if it was clearly stated that: push the TO/GA switch DOES NOT WORK in case of a bounced landing/touchdown.
It was news to me after the fact.
But I guess I'm alone here, and y'all knew better
It's quite simple, really. How about like the chaps down south has written in their FCOM: something like 'Warning: TOGA switches are inhibited if main gear has touched down'.
I saw it in their manual after the accident, but do not have the exact wording.
We have:
FCOM NP.21.56:
At the same time:
push the TO/GA switch
call FLAPS 20.
Verify:
the rotation to go-around attitude
that the thrust increases.
FCOM 11.31.31:
Missed Approach
A missed approach is accomplished by selection of either TOGA switch. The
following features are available: .......
So, I say again, as I did this morning; it would have been nice if it was clearly stated that: push the TO/GA switch DOES NOT WORK in case of a bounced landing/touchdown.
It was news to me after the fact.
But I guess I'm alone here, and y'all knew better
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Post-Pit and Lovin' It.
Posts: 863
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
(and please don't all chime in with 'yeah, but you gotta push and aviate, sucker!' It's getting old. Fast. Stating the obvious does not negate the fact).
Wow.
It may not explicitly state the lack of TOGA after touching down (you'd have to read Vol 2 in Systems to know that, *gasp* the horror!), but I'm pretty sure it has always stated "Verify Go-Around Thrust Set". Not realizing or remembering you won't have TOGA is forgivable. Not verifying you have what you commanded, less so.
Switches and knobs = rumour.
FMA = truth.
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Sandpit.
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Boeing, or the company, could easily have written into the manuals ... "the TOGA switches do not work after touch down, and activation is only possible once the aircraft is above five feet for more than two seconds".
This would, at least, alert all and sundry as to the system limitation. Sure, most of us are flying the jet and watching the FMA, but these guys weren't. They were relying on the system working as advertised.
"Ensuring TOGA thrust is set", or whatever the manual says, is simply dodging the bullet in this case.
Why EK and Boeing didn't, but outfits like Continental, etc did, is beyond me.
This would, at least, alert all and sundry as to the system limitation. Sure, most of us are flying the jet and watching the FMA, but these guys weren't. They were relying on the system working as advertised.
"Ensuring TOGA thrust is set", or whatever the manual says, is simply dodging the bullet in this case.
Why EK and Boeing didn't, but outfits like Continental, etc did, is beyond me.
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Stuttgart
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
FMA = truth
Why does this statement offend you? Is the concept of verifying an aircraft is doing what you want it to really that heavily dependent on the wording in a manual?
Wow.
It may not explicitly state the lack of TOGA after touching down (you'd have to read Vol 2 in Systems to know that, *gasp* the horror!), but I'm pretty sure it has always stated "Verify Go-Around Thrust Set". Not realizing or remembering you won't have TOGA is forgivable. Not verifying you have what you commanded, less so.
Switches and knobs = rumour.
FMA = truth.
Wow.
It may not explicitly state the lack of TOGA after touching down (you'd have to read Vol 2 in Systems to know that, *gasp* the horror!), but I'm pretty sure it has always stated "Verify Go-Around Thrust Set". Not realizing or remembering you won't have TOGA is forgivable. Not verifying you have what you commanded, less so.
Switches and knobs = rumour.
FMA = truth.
Truth is only if your arrows in the display show in the direction u want em' to show and the airplane is pointing in the direction u want it
It's called basic flying
E.g airbus heading
FMA says heading still the dam thing is turning in de wrong direction
engine display and PFD is the real truth
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: In the CRC
Age: 49
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Post-Pit and Lovin' It.
Posts: 863
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
FMA is close to truth
Truth is only if your arrows in the display show in the direction u want em' to show and the airplane is pointing in the direction u want it
It's called basic flying
E.g airbus heading
FMA says heading still the dam thing is turning in de wrong direction
engine display and PFD is the real truth
Truth is only if your arrows in the display show in the direction u want em' to show and the airplane is pointing in the direction u want it
It's called basic flying
E.g airbus heading
FMA says heading still the dam thing is turning in de wrong direction
engine display and PFD is the real truth
Point is pushing buttons is only half the battle. Need to look and see it actually did what you asked. Not much time to try and recall what was or wasn't written in some manual.
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: UAE
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If I'd been the lawyer, I'd try to sue boeing over the RAAS alarm that sounded, where it was clear that they had sufficient runway to stop...