Getting out of EK
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Dubai
Age: 50
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Whoever was posting about Airtran, I imagine those open positions will dry up very quickly now that Southwest is buying them. Again, job markets in U.S. is still on very shaky grounds.
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Earth
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nope I disagree, I've kept an eye on a mate who joined earlier this year. He's moved up 35 places in the last 6 months. 72 out of 2450'ish is not 3%, and anyway why can't it be 3%?
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: The Moon
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Fred Garvin M.P. wrote... Whoever was posting about Airtran, I imagine those open positions will dry up very quickly now that Southwest is buying them. Again, job markets in U.S. is still on very shaky grounds.
Fart Master wrote... Nope I disagree, I've kept an eye on a mate who joined earlier this year. He's moved up 35 places in the last 6 months. 72 out of 2450'ish is not 3%, and anyway why can't it be 3%?
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: MIDDLE EAST
Posts: 1,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The actual number is around 2%.
Fartmaster. Please, be so brave as to back up you statement by telling us the date when the last person was fired? This year was it?!!!!
Utter crap.
Harry
Fartmaster. Please, be so brave as to back up you statement by telling us the date when the last person was fired? This year was it?!!!!
Utter crap.
Harry
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Earth
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Harry,
Utter Crap, Charming!
1x Canuk 777 Capt approx 6 weeks ago....... 1x 380 Capt 8 days ago.
It's a bit sad really when someone makes a simple post, backed up with some info and then gets rude posts in return, it's hardly a contensious issue after all, pull your heads in boys.
Burnable.... my point exactly... it IS approx 3%
Utter Crap, Charming!
1x Canuk 777 Capt approx 6 weeks ago....... 1x 380 Capt 8 days ago.
It's a bit sad really when someone makes a simple post, backed up with some info and then gets rude posts in return, it's hardly a contensious issue after all, pull your heads in boys.
Burnable.... my point exactly... it IS approx 3%
Last edited by Fart Master; 29th Sep 2010 at 11:07.
At least those firings were (arguably) justified.
The firing of the Manchester F/O is a permanent stain on the companies character. Doesn't matter when it happened, unless they ring hmi, appologise, and offer to reinstate with full pay for the time since the incident, they are morally in the red.
And THAT from someone regularly accused of being a "Cheer-leader" for EK!!
The firing of the Manchester F/O is a permanent stain on the companies character. Doesn't matter when it happened, unless they ring hmi, appologise, and offer to reinstate with full pay for the time since the incident, they are morally in the red.
And THAT from someone regularly accused of being a "Cheer-leader" for EK!!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ok, so what exactly is the Manchester story with the FO? All I've heard was it was a FO on IOE with a checkairman CA, and they executed a wrong missed approach. While that is a big mistake, it is not worthy of firing someone over. Here in the states, filing an ASAP report would cover your as$, so as long as it was a 100% honest mistake. You'd get called in, have a meeting, and maybe get a letter in your file (which is tossed in 12-24 months anyway), but you would have still have your job.
So what gives? What happened to these two EK pilots and what exactly happened at Manchester?
So what gives? What happened to these two EK pilots and what exactly happened at Manchester?
Flyer,
Essentially correct (though do try and learn international parlance- IOE= Line Training, Checkairman=TRE (though this was a TRI), ASAP=CHIRP).
He unfortunatley had the bad karma to do it while the CEO was in the terminal, at a time when the company was still reacting (badly) to the Melbourne incident.
Unfair, unjust and immoral.
Essentially correct (though do try and learn international parlance- IOE= Line Training, Checkairman=TRE (though this was a TRI), ASAP=CHIRP).
He unfortunatley had the bad karma to do it while the CEO was in the terminal, at a time when the company was still reacting (badly) to the Melbourne incident.
Unfair, unjust and immoral.
100% correct except for this:-
It wasn't Ed, it was AA. Ed was a lot of things, but not (quite) THIS bad.
(Though the part about "Still under review is correct- seems he strung it out till the commanders conferences were over as he knew he couldn't possibly justify it.)
but the appeal was rejected by ED.
(Though the part about "Still under review is correct- seems he strung it out till the commanders conferences were over as he knew he couldn't possibly justify it.)
Registered User **
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Al Suffer
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wiz, they call you that because it fits you! Re-read your own post.
And you're the one who raised the reason for the sackings.
Still, I suppose it's always good to periodically re-post the way things work around here.
Harry, I believe there has also been three FOs sacked this year. A S. American, a limey and an aussie.
And you're the one who raised the reason for the sackings.
Still, I suppose it's always good to periodically re-post the way things work around here.
Harry, I believe there has also been three FOs sacked this year. A S. American, a limey and an aussie.
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: MIDDLE EAST
Posts: 1,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Then I stand corrected. Apologies to FartMaster.
Nobody tells me a feckin thing round here
Harry
ps For those in the know, what was the background in these recent dismissals?
Nobody tells me a feckin thing round here
Harry
ps For those in the know, what was the background in these recent dismissals?
Wiz, they call you that because it fits you! Re-read your own post.
And you're the one who raised the reason for the sackings.
Still, I suppose it's always good to periodically re-post the way things work around here.
And you're the one who raised the reason for the sackings.
Still, I suppose it's always good to periodically re-post the way things work around here.
Oakape, your info is closer to the source than mine, so maybe Ed WAS that big of a #$%^!!
Last edited by Wizofoz; 30th Sep 2010 at 13:28.
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Far East of Mexico
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nobody tells me anything as well.
I appreciate that working here I'm a mushroom, but would appreciate the reasons behind the sackings if someone in the know would be forthcoming.
Thank you in anticipation.
I am cursed to be "living in interesting times".
Oh for the simple life. . . . . .
I appreciate that working here I'm a mushroom, but would appreciate the reasons behind the sackings if someone in the know would be forthcoming.
Thank you in anticipation.
I am cursed to be "living in interesting times".
Oh for the simple life. . . . . .
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Up north
Posts: 1,657
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
For those of you from NA looking at options to "get out" Virgin America are advertising for pilots again. Looking at the delivery schedule you should be looking at upgrade within 2 years or so and at the same time you'll be sitting back home waiting for that command rather than down in the sand pit! Not too bad all things considered I guess?
Good luck!
CP
Good luck!
CP
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Far Far Away
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
AC Hiring
AC hiring 50 pilots this financial year. 700 pilots are retiring over the next 5 years, that's 140 new hire/year for a while just for retirement!
B767 will not be phased out, they are fitted with the new interior, meaning the arrival of the 787 will create expansion, more jobs to come along on top
Keep Discovering!
B767 will not be phased out, they are fitted with the new interior, meaning the arrival of the 787 will create expansion, more jobs to come along on top
Keep Discovering!