Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Middle East
Reload this Page >

EK and Fatigue related ASRs.

Wikiposts
Search
Middle East Many expats still flying in Knoteetingham. Regional issues can be discussed here.

EK and Fatigue related ASRs.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20th Nov 2008, 13:38
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: On the Beach
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
EK and Fatigue related ASRs.

Hats off and congratulations to those filing Air Safety Reports recently regarding the lack of suitable inflight rest now being offered in business class seats on augmented flights. In true arrogant EK Management style, each of those ASRs is responded to with words to the effect that 'Fleet Management consider the allocated seat adequate for inflight rest'. Perhaps they would like to join us on some of those operations affected by this recent demented policy change, to enable them to discover the true meaning of the word adequate.....

What is apparent though, is that EK's collection of many years' worth of fatigue related ASRs is not quite the answer. They do of course have to be filed, if only to provide statistical evidence of the issue. However, more importantly is that they have to be supported with associated evidence to ever have a chance of garnering change. For example, if such onboard fatigue relates to dozing off on the approach then this needs to be stated, as does omitting checklists, radio calls, reduction in situational awareness, handling lapses etc. If such flights lead to cumulative fatigue, do not operate your next duty. In fact, you have a legal obligation not to, and the docs at the clinic will support you. Make full use of the roster code SKF - you are not sick, but fatigued.

A collection of ASRs in most developed country airlines usually does the trick, but here things have to be backed up with some more positive considerations. It's not being anti-company, it's not illegal and you owe it to your friends and family not to let this job screw you into the ground. Most of all, you owe it to yourself.
Plank Cap is offline  
Old 20th Nov 2008, 22:58
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 665
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
'morning Al.
Andu is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2008, 02:56
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Surprised it didn't end with a "Toodle Pip".
Red Hackle is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2008, 05:07
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: sand box
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Or "please call me captain"
emratty is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2008, 09:14
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: dubai
Posts: 375
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I agree with you 100% Plank. Not sure if the previous 3 posts were meant in humor or not, hope so. This latest policy change is illegal, immoral and unsafe. Even though Ed and TCAS are.......... well you know........ I still find it hard to believe they can support such insanity.

We have only one recourse, ASR's.

The management of this company uses each period with high pilot applications, to further erode our T&C's. That says a lot about what they think of us and our profession. We just have to accept most things or leave, but when it comes to flight safety and our health, that is going way too far.
mensaboy is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2008, 11:44
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Raincoast
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mensaboy

If you subscribe to EK330 Captain on the Yahoo! Groups you would've noticed some interesting posts there regarding this situation... all in all it's still not amountin' to more than a hill of beans, but that's the background.

One of our esteemed colleagues is gettin' a bit verbose and posted some direct quotes from the ASR's in an effort to create a bit of interest in this matter.

Unfortunately his tone, argument, and persuasion are a burr under the saddle to some of our other esteemed colleagues... (me included) so those first few posts are referin' to that little matter. Also, he's bein' taken to task a bit by his peers fer violatin' company regs wrt sharing information to be held in corporate confidence. His intentions are good, but this kind of approach is all wrong and just don't advance our cause too well.

As we all know, EK management is masterful at exploitin' all the loopholes and the global regulatory bodies aren't helpin' us either. There aren't any actual regulations governin' what constitutes a proper crew rest area. The guidelines which do exist are in the form of FAA/GCAA/JAR Circulars and do not meet the authority criteria to become mandatory and are therefore not enforceable in any way shape or form. So we are treated like poor relatives who are begrudgingly given a place to crash on the couch... inference being they would rather we weren't here at all... I have been through the books on this, as much as one can here without drawing attention to oneself, cause we ain't allowed to approach GCAA without permission, (there's no legal protection for whistleblowers anyway) and it costs 1200 Dhs or so to avail yerself of the UAE CARS, and one don't dare visit one's CP or any other senior post holder in Flt Ops, 'cause they're all a bunch of sycophantic self servin' career minded types who view any form of constructive adherance to higher than cheapest/minimum standard to be a violation of their post holder responsibilities. what to do?, what to do?

Goddamn it's dispiriting, but TCAS and Mr Ed sure know how to exploit and as much as I hate being on the receivin' end I begrudgingly admit defeat on this issue. 100 million ASRS ain't gonna change a damn thing in this case. Those boys did their homework and we're screwed ladies 'n gents. Commercial expediency has always trumped safety - regulators, airframers, management, lawyers and insurance underwriters are all in cahoots on this. We've been outgunned fer good.

Happy contrails
k-o-t-s
kingoftheslipstream is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2008, 12:00
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: united arab emirates
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think ASR,s are actually the answer. If you are fatigued file one. An official record advising management of the problem is what is required. If they are obstinate enough to assume this is some sort of industrail action then they are foolish. An international court would not look favourably on a flight opps management team who did not listen to the outcrys of fatigue coming from their pilots. ( in the event of a major incident). Believe me they know and to no uncertian extent. They have an accountability and they know it. So if you really feel fatigued then file those ASR,s. Its the professional thing to do and has nothing to do with the erosion of conditions and is clearly an Air Safety issue.
fourgolds is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2008, 13:14
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: South of North
Posts: 655
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wait till they start paying us just for the stick time. This issue will seem small in comparison!!!
Trader is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2008, 13:32
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sandbox.
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
K.O.T.S. - While you are correct on many points I must say I'm surprised that you'll just "roll over" and admit defeat on this. ASR's are there for a reason; if it's unsafe, report it. At the very least there will be a paper trail if we bend an airplane due to fatigue. Please don't encourage fellow pilots to just give in to managment's silly policies, the last thing we need are indifferent and impartial crews. I say keep those ASR's comin'!
As Winston Churchill said, "Never, never, never give up".

YYZguy.
YYZguy is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2008, 14:21
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: uae
Posts: 2,777
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
He's not saying dont submit the ASR's just dont except much to change as a result of those ASR's. What is the illegal part?
fatbus is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2008, 15:11
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: not in Dubai anymore
Age: 94
Posts: 713
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
red hackle and emiratty,

you crack me up.

toodle pip
call me captain (otherwise I report you like the cabin crew who didnt adress me as captain)
GoreTex is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2008, 16:04
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: pit
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's elementary ....
They created a piece of art to protect their a...es, with the AOM, FOM, whatever you may call it.
We are simply foreced to play the same game, -> to protect ours.
ASRs, ASRs, ASRs (sounds familiar if pronounced fast enough, doesn't it)

If in future you sc..w up the slightest bit (god forbid), they won't miss you! BUT, ... with zillions of ASRs filed, you can then say you were fatigued and would have posted another ASR. The overwhelming evidence of preceding ASRs might even get you legally out of the mess!!
But with none written, there's only evidence AGAINST you.
pool is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2008, 16:17
  #13 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: On the Beach
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Apologies if my initial post came across as rather too abrasive for some, no offence intended. With reference to the first 3 replies, I think you may have the wrong person.........
Plank Cap is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2008, 16:39
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: united arab emirates
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pool has hit the nail on the head.
If management attempt to put out this fire by suffixing all fatigue related ASR,s with '"Fleet find the rest acceptable" and there is a history to indicate otherwise. Then they will be held to account and any pilot will have a strongly documented case to his/her defense , should they need it. This is a gift horse , kinda like a joker card or even a get out of jail free card.
fourgolds is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2008, 18:19
  #15 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Blighty
Posts: 1,440
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
Plank Cap is not, like he says who you think he is.

Toodle pip.

Or me either

EGGW
EGGW is offline  
Old 21st Nov 2008, 21:58
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: not in Dubai anymore
Age: 94
Posts: 713
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
is toodle pip the new captain england?
GoreTex is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2008, 08:48
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Dubai
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Management EK Style.

Apparently, on some flights they are now upgrading Pax to first class to provide us with seats in business. This is a great example of their tyranical mindset. What is a great pity is that they are not even clever enough to realise the damage the are causing along with the complete lack of respect they are generating for themselves.

If we are not getting adequate rest I feel that we are duty bound to take matters into our own hands. File an ASR, upgrade yourself and then insist on an F class seat for the way back on the grounds of SAFETY, all in accordance with the authority granted to you in the FOM.

Yes, you will have to meet the Muppets, but use their argument against them, "It is in the FOM" and "I am only applying a higher safety standard".

They are banking on everyone blowing hot air and taking no action as usual. Stand up and be counted!!!!!
Aircav is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2008, 10:39
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Land of NI
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Aircav

no Worries!!

you First!!:e
BIKKERDENNAH is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2008, 10:52
  #19 (permalink)  
FcU
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: somewhere else
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
not one minute of discretion EVER!!!
FcU is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2008, 22:06
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,451
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Let me guess, FcU... Still fondly imagining what that fourth bar will look on those broard, manly shoulders?
Wiley is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.