Cosmic rays
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Leeds, UK
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Cosmic rays
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Tightslot`s Place
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
More Harm
Cosmic radiation does more to the human organism than you can imagine.Couple this up with jetlag and you have everything from chromosomal damage to cataracts to breast cancer and brain tumours.Do a google and see what turns up.
These SOBs we work for know a lot more than they`re telling.
And it ain`t bollocks scroggs!!
These SOBs we work for know a lot more than they`re telling.
And it ain`t bollocks scroggs!!
Whilst interesting, the scale and design of the study is quite poor - it would be unwise to draw solid conclusions from it 
Pilots are more likely than most to develop skin cancers, but on the grand scale of things, their privileged lifestyle goes some way to protecting them from earlier, than average, death.
Cosmic man
Pilots are more likely than most to develop skin cancers, but on the grand scale of things, their privileged lifestyle goes some way to protecting them from earlier, than average, death.
Cosmic man
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Asia
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Haha, critical of scale and design of a study that is briefly touched on by the media and then SUCH a sweeping statement in the second part of your posting.
Not that anyone would draw solid conclusions from it… but do elaborate on those privileges so that we can all feel good again…
Not that anyone would draw solid conclusions from it… but do elaborate on those privileges so that we can all feel good again…
With MY reputation?
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Not fussed, as long as it's "Child Friendly"
Age: 52
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Cosmic Radiation IS considered to be a serious enough issue to legislate for. There are 2 seperate sections of JAR-OPS 1 that detail exactly what is required of the operator, and the Air Navigation Order was amended a few years ago to take account of monitoring requirements.
Every airline now has (or at least is required to have) a monitoring programme that should highlight high levels of exposure in individuals. Any level of exposure over 6milliSieverts (mSv) per year is considered "high", the average background dose for non-flyers is approximately 2.2mSv per year.
At my company (UK charter airline, crews operating up to 800 flying hours per year), no individual has so far reached the 6mSv figure in 5 years of sampling, although there are some that are above 5mSv.
Every airline now has (or at least is required to have) a monitoring programme that should highlight high levels of exposure in individuals. Any level of exposure over 6milliSieverts (mSv) per year is considered "high", the average background dose for non-flyers is approximately 2.2mSv per year.
At my company (UK charter airline, crews operating up to 800 flying hours per year), no individual has so far reached the 6mSv figure in 5 years of sampling, although there are some that are above 5mSv.
but do elaborate on those privileges so that we can all feel good again…
You tell me, I only fly a cessna !
If you are serios about finding out more, PM me I can point you in the right direction, alternatively talk to an insurance actuary, they've far more expertise than me !
