Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Wannabes Forums > Interviews, jobs & sponsorship
Reload this Page >

18 year old Trainee Pilot for Flybe

Wikiposts
Search
Interviews, jobs & sponsorship The forum where interviews, job offers and selection criteria can be discussed and exchanged.

18 year old Trainee Pilot for Flybe

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 19th Aug 2009, 05:26
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The Desert but shortly to be HK!)
Age: 49
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cityfan you are of course spot on.... however the wanabees won't listen.... half of them have no idea just how hard it will be to pay back 80k.... probably take the best part of a decade and then you have to worry about getting a mortgage.... what a life....
Grass strip basher is offline  
Old 19th Aug 2009, 08:20
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 1,114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
For those mocking the pilots who have accepted CC jobs, just bear this in mind. They are already on the seniority list, as it is based on date of joining. That by my reckoning, gives them a significant head start over any of the sneering Maccy D workers when the flying training eventually kicks off, as they get preferential first dibs on base and fleet, and will almost certainly be several months closer to flying the E195 than any of their compatriots.
I take your point but in reality seniority in an airline like Flybe is not much use unless these kids aspirations are to make a career out of flying a TP and stay put.

These 18 year old kids more than likely want to fly jets - and big ones at that. When the market picks up they will be off to BA, Virgin, BMI, Emirates, Ethihad, Cathay, Easy and all the usual suspects just like they have done since adam was a babe. Considering the guys ahead of them on the seniority list will be moving onwards and upwards as well then they would have naturally moved ahead of the pack in anycase if they are taken back at the front of the queue when Flybe recruits next. If it was me in that position then I would take a hold pool and my seniority and be trying for a better paying job elsewhere with a fallback to Flybe. I would send a copy of Flybe's acceptance letter to other operators in the hope that I would get an interview elsewhere since I was good enough to pass the entry tests at Flybe. Its been done before believe me.

Showing a willingness to work in a role other than what you were originally hired for is just making a rod for your own back and giving management the ability to push you around. What next - fly a few months a year and do ground operations when the winter schedule comes in? Or maybe just work the summer as a contractor like the CTC guys. Its all getting a bit FR if you ask me and needs to be nipped in the bud before this sort of thing becomes an industry wide practice.
potkettleblack is offline  
Old 19th Aug 2009, 15:42
  #23 (permalink)  
MVE
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 245
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Whether to work as CC or not has to be considered with what else is on offer?
What about chasing Ryr to work as a contractor with no job security and a further huge debt?
The point of these cadets taking the CC job is to get into the airline and have there faces at the front of the Q when the job market improves, which of course it will. If they take it as an opportunity and think about the future rather than the immediate present then it's a good move.
Personally I'd rather fly as CC for Flybe than for Mol as a contract pilot anyday.
Flybe has a working business model and it looks like RYR is failing as they can't afford to operate out of major airports like MAN or Stansted anymore (never mind operate into them!).....
MVE is offline  
Old 21st Aug 2009, 19:56
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Jersey
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I flew with one of the "pilot" cabin crew the other day said most of the people who were doing it were loving it for the time being getting to know all the staff aircraft etc. From what he said most of them have all been rostered dash courses now anyway and only flew as CC for 3/4 months which is a useful way to pay off the loans!!
Maverick8701 is offline  
Old 22nd Aug 2009, 19:41
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: The Land Downunder
Posts: 765
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hey when I joined BA at the age of 25 after a couple of years at another airline and a couple of years instructing I thought that I was doing rather well. Until my simulator course on the A320 when I had to go out and celebrate my simulator partners 20th Birthday!! And he had also come from another airline So 19 for a first airline job is not that rare these days.
Artificial Horizon is offline  
Old 23rd Aug 2009, 16:19
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The Castle
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All of the Flybe cadets, from whatever school, were placed on a post scheme holding pool list. Their position on the list was decided by their date of finishing. Any cadet who had money invested in them will go ahead of any cadet who has not, irrespective of their date of finishing training.
All cadets will be offered CC jobs (if available) in order to give them some money to fund their loans. There is no disadvantage to anyone who does not take up the offer of a CC job. There is no TR seniority gain for anybody who wishes to take a CC job.

Having said all that, Flybe have just announced a course for 16 FOs on the 19th October and a further 16 in Jan 10. These courses will empty the scheme pool of any current swimmers.

Good news at last!
Grizzle is offline  
Old 23rd Aug 2009, 21:58
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: By the sea
Age: 42
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flybe NEVER offered any CC job!! They only notified their pilot that no FO position was available but that they were more than welcome to APPLY for a CC position... Some did and some didn't get the job...
Not as kind as it seems.
"Any snacks, drinks. Coffee, tea?"
Bambe is offline  
Old 23rd Aug 2009, 22:54
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Here
Posts: 1,015
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I flew easyJet a couple weeks back, and the F/O had to have been only barely 20.

A lot of these must have very rich parents.
BAe 146-100 is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2009, 08:53
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: 6.3nm from LAM
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
he could have rich parents but then again he might know someone who works for Easyjet and put a word in for him.
L0wFly3r is offline  
Old 24th Aug 2009, 09:37
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flybe FO's

I don't know about 18 but there are a couple that look about 14.

And apparently they are a good pair of hands and a pleasure to share a cockpit with. Quite switched on, listen to advice, ask sensible questions, when an technical discussion comes up they go away and do some book work and come back to have a mature professional discussion on the subject. But this is only a couple of Captains views, they could get right on the tits of the others.

Could be a product of the training system but I doudt it. In other words looks don't count and neither does age
mad_jock is offline  
Old 25th Aug 2009, 14:10
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Mordor
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hey guys,

Age should not be a factor in any job, I had my first flying job at 19 and I'm still going now a few years later. I have flown with guys with tens of thousands of hours and they're terrible pilots but I'm the one who can't get taken seriously because of my age. It gets really tiring, I have substantial experience and do my job well and I hate people bringing me down.

I think seeing a young person in the left seat in any aircraft is good, age DOES NOT reflect experience.

Nuff said........
AviatorJack is offline  
Old 25th Aug 2009, 15:55
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 2,312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I had my first flying job at 19 and I'm still going now a few years later.
Hmmm. 4 years later. That is quite an achievement!
I have flown with guys with tens of thousands of hours and they're terrible pilots
Well it takes decades to amass that sort of experience. If they are so "terrible" I assume they must either be very lucky, or your own wealth of experience is not placing you in a serious position to make a truly qualified judgement.
but I'm the one who can't get taken seriously because of my age.
I wonder why?
I think seeing a young person in the left seat in any aircraft is good, age DOES NOT reflect experience.
Well in some cases it really does, and I think you are a perhaps a prime example.
Nuff said........
Yes more than enough (nuff) really.
Bealzebub is offline  
Old 26th Aug 2009, 03:14
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: canada
Age: 39
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pretty scary really, thank god the country I moved to chooses pilots with experience! What if the Captain had a coronary and the newbie FO who'd never flown in ice or even cloud before had to land the plane! I shudder to think. One good thing stemming from this recession is hopefully an end to the "buy yourself a jet job" culture.
Canadapilot is offline  
Old 26th Aug 2009, 15:33
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: London
Age: 48
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What if the Captain had a coronary and the newbie FO who'd never flown in ice or even cloud before had to land the plane! I shudder to think.
Yes what if!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!?

The 'newbie' would have a valid IR so you would have been trained to fly IMC.

Training for icing conditions would be given and I know its a massive assumption but you would think they would teach him/her to land the aircraft before getting released onto the line
balhambob is offline  
Old 26th Aug 2009, 16:20
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 1,114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Experience doesn't count for much when you start pumping good fuel out into the airflow. Nice glide approach though but lucky nevertheless.

Canada doesn't exactly have a shining track record of aviation safety so you might want to consider your position before generalising about 250hr wannabes over this side of the pond.
potkettleblack is offline  
Old 26th Aug 2009, 18:38
  #36 (permalink)  
Red On, Green On
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Between the woods and the water
Age: 24
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Let's get real - 19/20 year olds have been the sole pilot of RAF/RN jets for a long time - one of my early instructors in my RN time was carrier-deck qualified a few days after his 20th birthday, with just an Observer (navigator in RAF-land) to rein him in.
airborne_artist is offline  
Old 26th Aug 2009, 18:53
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 2,312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes that is true, but with an accident record that reflects the risk. The requirements for a pilot in a primary weapons delivery system are in many respects very different from those required to transport 300 assorted members of the public routinely from A to B. The two approaches to risk versus experience are markedly different.
Bealzebub is offline  
Old 26th Aug 2009, 19:32
  #38 (permalink)  
Red On, Green On
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Between the woods and the water
Age: 24
Posts: 6,487
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
True indeed, but you don't let a pilot loose on the deck of a carrier who is not ready for it. Good 19/20 year olds can be ready for it, just as they can be ready for civil transport operations. There is still a fundamental block in some peoples' minds that this is the case, though.
airborne_artist is offline  
Old 26th Aug 2009, 20:23
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 2,312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes, although I would suggest that the applicant screening process is significantly tougher and the subsequent training more intensive and unforgiving with your military pilot. In addition (and with this thread in mind) there is an arrogance that can be honed into a determination to succeed in one arena, that is a more dangerous and difficult element in the other.

That isn't to suggest that 19/20 year olds are not suitable for airline transport operations at an entry level. Many are, and many display a level of maturity, ability, and a desire to learn that ensures them a successful career. Of that there is no doubt. However unlike the military, there are often few opportunities for what I would term the "fear factor" whereby an individual frightens themselves enough to better understand and appreciate their own limits. In a civil environment that is something that cannot be allowed to happen for the first time with 300 passengers down the back. To some extent this relies upon the transfer of experience and the use of better awareness training in far greater measure, to provide an element of compensation. Nevertheless I think this is far from ideal in a world where a bag full of cash and 250 hours can potentially put somebody in that position, without the same degree of screening and attrition that would certainly be the case with your carrier pilot.

It is a problem to some extent, and one that the FAA administrator amongst others, has recently voiced his own concerns over (see R&N.)
Bealzebub is offline  
Old 28th Aug 2009, 09:29
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What do you mean 250 hours the lowest houred FO I have flown with was 170 hours. Single crew never
mad_jock is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.