Why I am encouraged
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: New Zealand
Age: 38
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Why I am encouraged
Give me a job on an outback ranch in West QLd scouting for wild cattle, or flying supplies and tourists round the okovanga in botswana anyday!
Until recently I was discouraged reading all the posts about lack of jobs for new CPL, MEIR pilots until i realised that the the posters were all actually crazy people looking to get straight into an airline with 200 hours. Have I lost touch with reality? Is this ACTUALLY what is expected?! Companies should be wary of people who want to skip the foundation of aviation and get straight into the castle. Maybe it is a symptom of a generation that encourages 'yuppiness'. You want to be a jet pilot while you are still young and sexy? How about becoming a man first!
This is not a gripe of an nostalgic old man.. i'm 22 and looking for my first job. Why am i encouraged? I am encouraged because while others are falling over themselves with surreal dillusions to the point of hanging themselves with their ties (which they haven't earned), i can work my way up through the real world and wave as i fly by in my trusty Cessna 206 with its bung door.
Until recently I was discouraged reading all the posts about lack of jobs for new CPL, MEIR pilots until i realised that the the posters were all actually crazy people looking to get straight into an airline with 200 hours. Have I lost touch with reality? Is this ACTUALLY what is expected?! Companies should be wary of people who want to skip the foundation of aviation and get straight into the castle. Maybe it is a symptom of a generation that encourages 'yuppiness'. You want to be a jet pilot while you are still young and sexy? How about becoming a man first!
This is not a gripe of an nostalgic old man.. i'm 22 and looking for my first job. Why am i encouraged? I am encouraged because while others are falling over themselves with surreal dillusions to the point of hanging themselves with their ties (which they haven't earned), i can work my way up through the real world and wave as i fly by in my trusty Cessna 206 with its bung door.
PPRuNe Handmaiden
"trusty" and "C206" aren't often used together. 
Personally, I agree. To go straight from flight school to a RHS in a jet means you've missed out on a lot of fun and learning experiences. It's not always necessary to do the full on bush efforts then flog around in a turboprop before being allowed near a jet, however, all steps have taught me a lot - skills and experience I still use today.
Anyway, in Europe and the UK they don't have GA as the Africans, NZ, Aussies, Yanks and Canucks know it.
Personally, I agree. To go straight from flight school to a RHS in a jet means you've missed out on a lot of fun and learning experiences. It's not always necessary to do the full on bush efforts then flog around in a turboprop before being allowed near a jet, however, all steps have taught me a lot - skills and experience I still use today.
Anyway, in Europe and the UK they don't have GA as the Africans, NZ, Aussies, Yanks and Canucks know it.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: New Zealand
Age: 38
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Oh ok. so is there actually very little choice but to go into airlines straight off the bat?
Haha 206's may not go forever.. but at least when the engine does fall out you can just glide into a paddock!
Haha 206's may not go forever.. but at least when the engine does fall out you can just glide into a paddock!
PPRuNe Handmaiden
You assume there's a paddock....
Europe is a different market to Australia and NZ.
Europe is a different market to Australia and NZ.
Join Date: May 2001
Location: England
Posts: 1,904
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sure we'd all like the chance to fly some rare animal breed to rescue; spray farmer John's backyard or carry dangerous chemicals across the Sahara but i'll put it to you that this is even more of a fantasy than a newbie coming straight out of flying school and getting a jet job! These sort of roles often require much more than the bare minimum 200 hours flying time. Come on, be fair! It's more than just about getting into a jet. A jet job is the only pilot's job that (mostly) guarantees the following:
I value the above items more than the thrills and experience a bush pilot's job can offer. Any day! And for that I'm happy to wait years (personally)
- Safe working environment
- Well paid (most of us have debts to pay due to flying)
- Well paid (most of us pay rent/mortgages)
- Well paid (because we want to be)
- Job security (well, mostly)
- Reasonable roster stability (some of us have family life to plan around)
- Tend to have a local base (all of us have loved ones we need to be around even once in a while)
I value the above items more than the thrills and experience a bush pilot's job can offer. Any day! And for that I'm happy to wait years (personally)
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Cochin VOCI , India
Age: 35
Posts: 1,605
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What i understood from the first post sounds like
Jet jobs are boring
Crop Dusting , Banner Towing etc very interesting and more thrilling
Am I right ?
Jet jobs are boring
Crop Dusting , Banner Towing etc very interesting and more thrilling
Am I right ?
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No not so I'd say for me. I find airline flying interesting in it's own right. I've done GA flying for 6 years and love the memories (most anyway) but it definately had it's day. Wouldn't fancy doing it forever by any stretch. There's other types of flying I fancied along with new challenges. Depends what floats your boat. I thought when I first got a PPL that I'd never want to be anything other than a bush Pilot etc etc but that changed!
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Ireland
Posts: 627
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
jnvivier is right and so is everyone else. My current job is great fun but has no long term viability. I just got off my bank account online after paying a couple of credit card bills. It's still overdrawn despite a couple of good recent flying weeks. Ironic now that the summer is gone, the flying improves!
So I need the airline job eventually for all reasons enumerated in superpilot's post. If I don't then I'll actually have to quit flying professionally and keep my ratings current with a bit of part time work, instructing and whatever else I can keep going. That's the reality I face having mortgages and a wife and kids. She can't subsidise me forever (and won't).
But I completely agree with jnvivier as to the attitude of many newly qualified pilots who just sit back and wait, making no effort to keep flying other than to renew ratings and whinge about how bad it is. Particularly when they have no ties to hold them back. If I was single now. I would be off somewhere having fun while the bad times roll in the airline business.
I actually feel quite lucky, that when someone asks what I do, I have to tell them I'm a working professional pilot, (even though that doesn't allow me to comment in R&N because it's strictly the remit of the 'airline pilot'
). I know quite a few pilots with better qualifications than me getting by in their old career. They usually make a lot more money than me. They envy me. I envy their money. They don't envy my money.
That's the way it is.
So I need the airline job eventually for all reasons enumerated in superpilot's post. If I don't then I'll actually have to quit flying professionally and keep my ratings current with a bit of part time work, instructing and whatever else I can keep going. That's the reality I face having mortgages and a wife and kids. She can't subsidise me forever (and won't).
But I completely agree with jnvivier as to the attitude of many newly qualified pilots who just sit back and wait, making no effort to keep flying other than to renew ratings and whinge about how bad it is. Particularly when they have no ties to hold them back. If I was single now. I would be off somewhere having fun while the bad times roll in the airline business.
I actually feel quite lucky, that when someone asks what I do, I have to tell them I'm a working professional pilot, (even though that doesn't allow me to comment in R&N because it's strictly the remit of the 'airline pilot'
). I know quite a few pilots with better qualifications than me getting by in their old career. They usually make a lot more money than me. They envy me. I envy their money. They don't envy my money. That's the way it is.
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: tahiti
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Corsair is very reasonable in his thinking.
If you just graduated a flight training course your best chances are in Africa and in Asia.
If you know the risks of flying in Africa and stay aware, you will be fine.
Too many expect to come out of the flight school with 200 hours and to have an airline waiting there and waving at them.
I think that in the interest of safety, I don't want to see a pilot with less than 1000 hours flying an A320 or B737 no matter if the guy sitting next to him has 30 000 hours.
Be reasonable people, instruct, find any flying job and climb the ladder in a progressive matter. Don't try to jump from a Seneca to an A320.
I agree with Corsair that a bush job in Africa or a RHS job on a King Air/Caravan/Twin Otter/Dash 8 can be as rewarding as a B737 job.
If you just graduated a flight training course your best chances are in Africa and in Asia.
If you know the risks of flying in Africa and stay aware, you will be fine.
Too many expect to come out of the flight school with 200 hours and to have an airline waiting there and waving at them.
I think that in the interest of safety, I don't want to see a pilot with less than 1000 hours flying an A320 or B737 no matter if the guy sitting next to him has 30 000 hours.
Be reasonable people, instruct, find any flying job and climb the ladder in a progressive matter. Don't try to jump from a Seneca to an A320.
I agree with Corsair that a bush job in Africa or a RHS job on a King Air/Caravan/Twin Otter/Dash 8 can be as rewarding as a B737 job.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: New Zealand
Age: 38
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ok so maybe i was a bit harsh! And I should put my points into context by addressing issues bought up here.
-First of all I was aiming my gripe at those young pilots who have the option but would rather whine about jet jobs, if you got into flying with a mortgage and family then you are a braver man than i am!
-I didn't quite realise that there was no GA as such in europe.
-Crop dusting is ag flying, a completely unique and skillfull speciality altogether for those more carefree about job survival. Banner towing is usually a one off job, not exactly full time work there! Unless that is what you like. GA covers a lot of different flying.
-Flying tourists in botswana isn't dangerous, otherwise tourists wouldn't pay $600 a night to stay in lodges that you can only reach by air. Also some guys seem to think I mean this as a long term career option, but really all you do is work at these places for 2 years, get 1800 hours then getting into a jet job is a lot easier.
-I do not think jet jobs are boring!! I just want to work for mine. Its about life experience
-Job security etc in jets? That must be another thing that is different in Europe!
-First of all I was aiming my gripe at those young pilots who have the option but would rather whine about jet jobs, if you got into flying with a mortgage and family then you are a braver man than i am!
-I didn't quite realise that there was no GA as such in europe.
-Crop dusting is ag flying, a completely unique and skillfull speciality altogether for those more carefree about job survival. Banner towing is usually a one off job, not exactly full time work there! Unless that is what you like. GA covers a lot of different flying.
-Flying tourists in botswana isn't dangerous, otherwise tourists wouldn't pay $600 a night to stay in lodges that you can only reach by air. Also some guys seem to think I mean this as a long term career option, but really all you do is work at these places for 2 years, get 1800 hours then getting into a jet job is a lot easier.
-I do not think jet jobs are boring!! I just want to work for mine. Its about life experience
-Job security etc in jets? That must be another thing that is different in Europe!
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: NZ
Age: 36
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
jnvivier....you know Ive often wondered if half the people on here complaining about no jobs have actually thought about it like you have?
You've touched on a good point, I mean its all nice and easy (not so easy) getting straight into the RHS, but the chances are slim.
I often ask pilots what their favourite memories are of flying and in all honesty (even though they love their highly paid jet jobs), they almost without fail, say the period from getting their CPL to getting in the airline industry, the whole roughing it in out of the way places, flying by the seat of your pants.... thats the character building that has created some AMAZING pilots.
@corsair
I think you've really hit the nail on the head!
...and make sure you have a flat place to land in an engine fail, otherwise you will end up like a family friends fletcher.....he made the paddock....just on the side of a hill (he made it out!)
You've touched on a good point, I mean its all nice and easy (not so easy) getting straight into the RHS, but the chances are slim.
I often ask pilots what their favourite memories are of flying and in all honesty (even though they love their highly paid jet jobs), they almost without fail, say the period from getting their CPL to getting in the airline industry, the whole roughing it in out of the way places, flying by the seat of your pants.... thats the character building that has created some AMAZING pilots.
@corsair
I think you've really hit the nail on the head!
...and make sure you have a flat place to land in an engine fail, otherwise you will end up like a family friends fletcher.....he made the paddock....just on the side of a hill (he made it out!)
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: The Land Downunder
Posts: 765
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Always makes me laugh this argument that you are not a 'real' pilot until you have worked your way up through the GA ranks and flown in the 'bush'. What a load of cr*p. This is coming from someone who has spent a few years in GA/Instructing/Turboprops and finally the nice Shiny Jet. If I could have gone straight to the nice shiney jet I certainly would of. Having now flown with guys right from the cross section of aviation GA Pilots / ex- Military Pilots / Airline ONLY Pilots all have one thing in common.... Some are exceptional pilots, most are average pilots and some are exceptionally bad pilots. It makes no real difference where they originate from. So when it comes down to it, it you want to fly around the bush then do it, if you want to try and go straight to the airlines then do it. Just please don't get all high and mighty about how one makes a better pilot that the other because that argument is totally boll*cks and is usually the argument used by guys who for one reason or another are jealous of other peoples positions or insecure about their own.
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: New Zealand
Age: 38
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In reply to Artificial Horizon.
For all those who can get straight into an airline then good for you that is fine.. my main issue is that if you can't, and there are still other options out there, you shouldn't complain about there being 'no jobs'. If you can't get straight into a jet, there are jobs out there that can get you the experience to do so.
For all those who can get straight into an airline then good for you that is fine.. my main issue is that if you can't, and there are still other options out there, you shouldn't complain about there being 'no jobs'. If you can't get straight into a jet, there are jobs out there that can get you the experience to do so.
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The Desert but shortly to be HK!)
Age: 49
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sure it is simple economics.... training cost £50-100k depending on route and this is often paid for with a huge loan. The repayment profile of this loan means you can't repay it on a FI/Bush flying salary hence the need for a jet job.... I would love to spend my time flying round the African bush but harsh realities mean it doesn't pay the mortgage. Welcome to the real world.
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Europa
Posts: 612
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"I didn't quite realise that there was no GA as such in europe."
Of course there is GA in Europe!!!!!
It's just some are too blind to notice anything smaller than a 737.
Just look at AOPA, IPA, GAPAN et al.
As for Paddocks - try flying over Lincolnshire UK - pleanty of space for PFLs!
GA pilots out number Airline pilots. PPLs are still active in spite of costs.
From Lightweight machines to Biz Jets the scene is not a s bad as some perceive.
There are FI jobs out there if you are willing to do the leg work.
Best to all
AO
It's just some are too blind to notice anything smaller than a 737.
Just look at AOPA, IPA, GAPAN et al.
As for Paddocks - try flying over Lincolnshire UK - pleanty of space for PFLs!
GA pilots out number Airline pilots. PPLs are still active in spite of costs.
From Lightweight machines to Biz Jets the scene is not a s bad as some perceive.
There are FI jobs out there if you are willing to do the leg work.
Best to all
AO
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Earth
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you could name a couple?
Business aviation is not open to low hours pilots (net-jets for e.g wants 1500hrs) nor is air-taxi due to insurance. That leaves the 'banner towing/para-dropping/glider-tugging' that everyone on here seems to go on about. Firstly that won't pay the bills (most of that type of 'work' is unpaid anyway) and secondly with 20 pilots per month finishing from one integrated course alone, how many banners do you seen around anyway??
The only option is instructing- 60 new fATPLs each month from integrated courses alone. Doesn't take great maths to realise if eveyone did a FI course there wouldn't be enought PPL students to teach!
So to everyone who peddles the 'banner towing/para-dropping/glider-tugging' 'work your way up the chain' line please please give people some of your wisdom and give them a nudge in the direction of these huge banner towing companies....
Business aviation is not open to low hours pilots (net-jets for e.g wants 1500hrs) nor is air-taxi due to insurance. That leaves the 'banner towing/para-dropping/glider-tugging' that everyone on here seems to go on about. Firstly that won't pay the bills (most of that type of 'work' is unpaid anyway) and secondly with 20 pilots per month finishing from one integrated course alone, how many banners do you seen around anyway??
The only option is instructing- 60 new fATPLs each month from integrated courses alone. Doesn't take great maths to realise if eveyone did a FI course there wouldn't be enought PPL students to teach!
So to everyone who peddles the 'banner towing/para-dropping/glider-tugging' 'work your way up the chain' line please please give people some of your wisdom and give them a nudge in the direction of these huge banner towing companies....
PPRuNe Handmaiden
Artificial Horizon,
Sorry for the late reply, I've been floating around the Greek Isles on a boat.
Flying around as a bush pilot isn't the only way, however, I am now living in Europe and here it's a strange market. Bush flying is looked on as pure cowboy stuff and believe it or not, there is an attitude from some quarters that turboprop flying is beneath them. Also, if you've only flown a turboprop then you must have "failed" and so will be very difficult to train up on a jet.
The general attitude in Europe is to be an "airline" pilot, as opposed to being a "pilot". Perhaps it's marketing. So, the students will go into enormous amounts of debt thinking it's the only way to become an "airline pilot". Rather than doing the training in steps (modular) or accepting a bonded turboprop job.
As a personal note, do I regret my bush flying experience, definitely not. Do I use the experience from that flying in my jet job, yes I do. Could I have done the training differently, yes. I would have changed schools a lot quicker. But that's another story....
Sorry for the late reply, I've been floating around the Greek Isles on a boat.
Flying around as a bush pilot isn't the only way, however, I am now living in Europe and here it's a strange market. Bush flying is looked on as pure cowboy stuff and believe it or not, there is an attitude from some quarters that turboprop flying is beneath them. Also, if you've only flown a turboprop then you must have "failed" and so will be very difficult to train up on a jet.
The general attitude in Europe is to be an "airline" pilot, as opposed to being a "pilot". Perhaps it's marketing. So, the students will go into enormous amounts of debt thinking it's the only way to become an "airline pilot". Rather than doing the training in steps (modular) or accepting a bonded turboprop job.
As a personal note, do I regret my bush flying experience, definitely not. Do I use the experience from that flying in my jet job, yes I do. Could I have done the training differently, yes. I would have changed schools a lot quicker. But that's another story....
Join Date: Jan 1997
Location: UK
Posts: 7,737
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Location, Location, Location
Every response here is conditioned to a greater or lesser extent by where the writer became interested in and took up aviation.
Well worth noting the location from posters and reading their localised forums on PPRuNe to see where they are coming from in terms of aviation culture.
Simply put our forums show that the aviation cultures of Australia and New Zealand are still coming to terms with direct entry to the right seat of a modern transport aircraft.
Roll back the clock five years in our OZ archives and you'll find totally accepted dogma that thousands of hours doing the 'hard yards' are needed to fly a turboprop. The debate is raging over there right now that direct entry effos can't possible get the experience to be a competent commander and that PICUS is the work of the devil.
A few hours reading there also brings on the inevitable conclusion that the training industry there primarily exists to give some sort of living to those who can't or aren't yet ready get into an airline
Similarly is is totally accepted within American circles that you will always have to possess a 4 year degree to ever work for a major airline. It is also common to repeat exams to gain 100% for the resume.
It's different in each area of the world that's all and each poster brings some of that baggage with them. The originating post to the thread isn't sparkling, new or original I'm afraid. It simply reflects cheerful acceptance of exactly what New Zealanders expect to have to do and always have done.
Rob
Well worth noting the location from posters and reading their localised forums on PPRuNe to see where they are coming from in terms of aviation culture.
Simply put our forums show that the aviation cultures of Australia and New Zealand are still coming to terms with direct entry to the right seat of a modern transport aircraft.
Roll back the clock five years in our OZ archives and you'll find totally accepted dogma that thousands of hours doing the 'hard yards' are needed to fly a turboprop. The debate is raging over there right now that direct entry effos can't possible get the experience to be a competent commander and that PICUS is the work of the devil.
A few hours reading there also brings on the inevitable conclusion that the training industry there primarily exists to give some sort of living to those who can't or aren't yet ready get into an airline
Similarly is is totally accepted within American circles that you will always have to possess a 4 year degree to ever work for a major airline. It is also common to repeat exams to gain 100% for the resume.
It's different in each area of the world that's all and each poster brings some of that baggage with them. The originating post to the thread isn't sparkling, new or original I'm afraid. It simply reflects cheerful acceptance of exactly what New Zealanders expect to have to do and always have done.
Rob