PPRuNe Forums

PPRuNe Forums (https://www.pprune.org/)
-   Freight Dogs (https://www.pprune.org/freight-dogs-41/)
-   -   Kalitta splits in two (https://www.pprune.org/freight-dogs/328347-kalitta-splits-two.html)

weido_salt 29th May 2008 14:38

greuzi

What happened mate?

Choke on your lunch? Bit of Grissel? Then spit it out if you got something to say!:=

HalloweenJack 29th May 2008 15:49

http://www.flightglobal.com/articles...-take-off.html


Pilots of the Kalitta Air Boeing 747-200 freighter destroyed after overrunning at Brussels rejected the take-off at about the same time as air traffic controllers observed a fire in one of the aircraft’s two right-hand engines.
that seems very plausable - aircraft at V1 or just afer has a fire alert and rejects the take - off, leaving little breathing room for slowing down at near rotation speed for a heavy loaded freighter.

will be a brown trousers moment for any freight dog to suddenly lose an engine at a critical time.

Mile Hi 29th May 2008 18:12

All OK
 
Hey Guy's the main thing is all are OK to fly another day....

Greetings from the past,
BKK, Richard

layinlow 29th May 2008 19:22

Great to hear!!!

L-38 29th May 2008 19:41

N704CK's fractured fuselage breaks are reminiscent of the animated rendition of where TWA 800 broke apart after it's belly blast. Similar fracture points?

layinlow 30th May 2008 01:05

With the fuel load they had the center tank was empty.
structural failure or just and engine puking? Only time will tell

zerozero 30th May 2008 08:46

Interesting theory.
 

Originally Posted by L-38
N704CK's fractured fuselage breaks are reminiscent of the animated rendition of where TWA 800 broke apart after it's belly blast. Similar fracture points?

So, you're suggesting it was either a bomb or it was shot down?

:p

;)

layinlow 30th May 2008 12:20

No. I am just wonder what happened; did it break apart on takeoff or after rejecting for an engine failure? I am sure the investigations will reveal what actually happened.

Evanelpus 30th May 2008 12:45

No. I am just wonder what happened; did it break apart on takeoff or after rejecting for an engine failure? I am sure the investigations will reveal what actually happened.

Don't think the aircraft took off mate, thought it aborted around V1.

One would sincerely hope that the accident investigation DOES reveal what happened.

trashhauler 30th May 2008 14:46

Oh, I am sure they will. They have all the parts, the Belgians, FAA, and NTSB are all on the case. It may take a while. Thank God they didn't burst into flames.

L-38 30th May 2008 15:13

"So, you're suggesting it was either a bomb or it was shot down?"

Yeah - 704 suffered a direct hit, shot down by a midget while laying on his back on the runway centerline. .(just after the nose wheel squished him).

No . . . . . Post #45 should read - common fail point when stressed . . . that's all, nothing more.

ex dog 30th May 2008 23:53

Evanelpus
 
Sorry for my ignorance , but i thought V1 was point of no return

No matter What !!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Junkflyer 31st May 2008 03:54

It is, but there are rare instances where you don't have a choice-dual engine failure on a 74 etc.

sidman 31st May 2008 07:03

Heard the FO was the one that aborted!! Did they lose two engines on the runway?

SNS3Guppy 31st May 2008 07:26

That operator does not abort takeoffs; it rejects them, and the First Officer does not have the option of rejecting the takeoff. Only the captain does that.

fesmokie 31st May 2008 14:07

ex dog
 
PNR or Point of No return ( as you put it) has nothing to do with V speeds. If a very old and Big aircraft such as a 747 classic suffers a major malfunction such as two engines failing during the TO roll or it breaks in half after V1 it may just warrant rejecting the Take Off. :ugh: The experts should find the cause so we don't have to.

ex dog 31st May 2008 23:37

Fesmokie
 
Yes ,you are correct , i don't no the answer , just happy the crew got out
The pictures i have seen look pretty horrendous

Heavy Cargo 2nd June 2008 12:05

If 1 eng out ,Get it 50foot in the air ,gear up and start dumping at the fence. Keep going ?
If 2 out do as they did ?

Glad all ok.

point8six 2nd June 2008 13:03

Why the hurry to start fuel jettison? The a/c would only be 300-310 tonnes, with a max. landing weight of 285 tonnes. Stick to company SOPs regarding flight following an engine failure. With 2 engines losing power - that's a different story!
So far there doesn't seem to be any evidence that the RTO was started after V1, nor that 2 engines lost power.

Check 3 Greens 3rd June 2008 07:17

If you loose 2 engines after V1, it's just not your lucky day...

V1 is a calculated figure which is giving the relation between ASDA and TORA.
At this specific point (speed vs rwy lenght) the decision Has to be made to either stop or go. Make the decision a few knots before V1, 'cause with the acceleration your initiation may well be later than V1...:ouch:
Anything later than that and you're committed to go. That's what you briefed in the first place.
Only with a relatively light aircraft and a very long rwy (not limiting)
there's room for improvisation if it's gonna save your asses.
Try EdwardsAFB...;)

The difficult one is when the problem occures just before V1 but remains unnoticed or the action is delayed until you've already passed the magic number...-> It's now a GO because as per your calculations you Will go off the runway if you try to stop the beast at this point... :eek::=

It's all in the Boeing FCTM if you have one.

Sorry for being a bit academic, but this stop/go discussion was leading us nowhere...:}

Guys take care outthere and I suggest you request Rwy 25 for a while when in Bru.

Chrz,


All times are GMT. The time now is 00:31.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.