PPRuNe Forums


Freight Dogs Finally a forum for those midnight prowler types who utilise the unglamorous parts of airports that many of us never get to see. Freight Dogs is for pilots and crew who operate mostly without SLF.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 3rd Dec 2017, 19:37   #1 (permalink)
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 1,363
FedEx Buys New Cessna SkyCourier 408

FedEx buys new TP freight feeder airplane. Ive read a few articles all saying much the same things. I assume it'll be a 2-pilot crew ? Nothing I've read so far states that.

Interesting comments about "... a collaborative training program we are planning, will create a reliable pipeline of well-qualified pilot applicants for FedEx Express pilot jobs, leveraging the experience they will gain in our feeder system,” Hall said."

https://aircargoworld.com/allposts/f...kycourier-408/

Also some speculation Amazon Prime Air might be a customer. Not sure how that works if they don't have their own, independent certificate:

https://aircargoworld.com/allposts/i...kycourier-408/

Last edited by bafanguy; 3rd Dec 2017 at 21:57.
bafanguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th Dec 2017, 13:20   #2 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: G.B
Posts: 22
The new Cessna 408 SkyCourier reminds me of the Ayers Loadmaster.
FedEx was also it’s launch customer.
But it didn’t progress past mock-up stage.
It now sits in the weeds at KABY Albany South-West Georgia Regional.

I thought it looked like ‘Snuffy’ from the children’s TV show ‘Jay Jay the Jet Plane’.

Last edited by button push ignored; 7th Dec 2017 at 14:38.
button push ignored is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th Dec 2017, 21:46   #3 (permalink)
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 1,363
I've not seen anything about whether the airplane will be certified for single pilot operation. Anybody know the answer to that ?
bafanguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th Dec 2017, 09:38   #4 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: 4DME
Posts: 1,453
Is there anything to compete against? Looks a good replacement for Jetstream 31 sized aircraft.
N707ZS is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 5th Dec 2017, 21:47   #5 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Off the map
Posts: 895
The M28 Skytruck looks decent, although the Cessna should have better payload: 2,722 kg (6,000 lb) vs 2300 kg (5070 lbs).

Last edited by DirtyProp; 6th Dec 2017 at 10:13.
DirtyProp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th Dec 2017, 16:58   #6 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 5,638
Really a simple cargo truck - realtively slow but boxy, cheap and very low development costs presumably
Heathrow Harry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th Dec 2017, 14:47   #7 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: G.B
Posts: 22
[QUOTE=bafanguy

Interesting comments about "... a collaborative training program we are planning, will create a reliable pipeline of well-qualified pilot applicants for FedEx Express pilot jobs, leveraging the experience they will gain in our feeder system,” Hall said."
[/QUOTE

This is far more interesting than the aircraft.

I hope it will be a full flow through system like the passenger legacy carriers have for their regionals.

Last edited by button push ignored; 7th Dec 2017 at 18:48.
button push ignored is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th Dec 2017, 15:44   #8 (permalink)
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 1,363
Quote:
Originally Posted by button push ignored View Post
This is far more interesting than the aircraft.
pbi,

Yes, that's how it struck me too. The statement generates more questions than answers.

Even the airplane purchase announcement on the FedEx website didn't offer any explanation.

Just pure speculation on my part but much of this "pipeline" idea will depend on how early they intend to get the young people on board: fresh CPL/IR/MEL ?

I've seen no statement about whether this proposed airplane will be certified single-pilot or not. I'd think that decision would affect just how "new" pilots could be to enter this "pipeline". IIUC, Part 135 would allow them to use fresh blood but SIC time in a single-pilot airplane wouldn't be loggable ?

They also ordered a bunch of purpose-built ATR72 freighters. Since the ATR72 operation is Part 121, IIUC, F/Os will need an ATP or at least a rATP. To cast the widest net, they'd have to affiliate with colleges whose grads are eligible for a rATP.

All above my pay grade.

This MIGHT be enticing enough to new guys to divert some of the flow from regionals...and into whatever the FedEx deal actually is...if there's a big purple carrot being dangled.

Last edited by bafanguy; 7th Dec 2017 at 21:10.
bafanguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th Dec 2017, 19:21   #9 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: G.B
Posts: 22
Yesterday I was talking to some Ameriflight Pilots about this situation.
They have a flow through to Allegiant, Spirit or Omni.
Neither was sticking around to find out.
One was going to SkyWest next week, and the other I tried to talk out of Horizon. (great company, but too long for an upgrade, and on turboprops)
One had 250 hours of unlogable co-pilot time, that held up his exit.
Should my daughter wait her turn at Mountain with a flow through, or would she be better off taking every opportunity that comes her way?
Personally Id be perfectly content eating purple carrots for the rest of my life.
But maybe shed be better suited to the double breasted lifestyle.

Last edited by button push ignored; 9th Dec 2017 at 02:36.
button push ignored is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th Dec 2017, 00:17   #10 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Toledo
Posts: 411
Will the 408 be single pilot? It will depend on how Cessna and the FAA certifies it.

Why is FedEx looking a this aircraft? Because FedEx is running as many as 4 Caravans on some runs. A great number of these runs are quite short, so ATR's are not a viable aircraft on these runs due to cycle costs. The 408 will be a growth on the Caravan.

Can't wait to see it on floats.
rick1128 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th Dec 2017, 00:38   #11 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Toledo
Posts: 411
Quote:
Originally Posted by button push ignored View Post
One had 250 hours of unlogable co-pilot time, that held up his exit.
Why was this pilot's time unlogable? Was it because he was assigned as an SIC in an aircraft that was certified for single pilot operation? If so he would need to answer the following questions:

1. Was it under Part 135?
2. Was the pilot assigned to the flight as an SIC?
3. Was the pilot trained and properly qualified? Required company 135 training and successfully passed a Part 135 SIC checkride in the aircraft?

According to the Office of the Chief Counsel for the FAA if the answer is 'YES" to all three questions, the flight time is logable. The Chief Counsel's office has issued a letter of interpretation on this.

I know that someone out there is going to say "A FAA inspector told me it wasn't logable". Inspectors are required to follow the interpretations of the Chief Counsel's office.
rick1128 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th Dec 2017, 06:32   #12 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,603
Which letter is that? The Nichols letter of 2009 states that the SIC must be required either by the TDC or the regulations the aircraft is operated under and specifically gives an example where a part 135 SIC would not be able to log time.
MarkerInbound is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th Dec 2017, 11:14   #13 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London
Posts: 5,638
"Will the 408 be single pilot? It will depend on how Cessna and the FAA certifies it."

When people like Airbus are starting to plan for one operation of airliners I think you should be able to guess the answer.......... some will probably be operated with two crew as part of any training exercise but two-man operation is something I doubt any buyer would choose if they could get by with one man operation
Heathrow Harry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th Dec 2017, 20:28   #14 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Toledo
Posts: 411
Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkerInbound View Post
Which letter is that? The Nichols letter of 2009 states that the SIC must be required either by the TDC or the regulations the aircraft is operated under and specifically gives an example where a part 135 SIC would not be able to log time.
Marker,

The Nichols letter is not very clear, but the air carrier, may elect to operate the aircraft without the autopilot, in other words with a SIC. The letter does not state that the autopilot has to be inoperative. So if the pilot is assigned to the flight as SIC, they may log the flight time.

One thing to keep in mind when dealing with Letters of Interpretation is that they are written by lawyers, not pilots, so be careful on reading anything between the lines.
rick1128 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th Dec 2017, 21:38   #15 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,603
I agree, a lot of what the FAA says is not very clear. But if the company assigns a SIC to a flight for convenience, say to help with the loading of cargo, and was operating under the autopilot in place of a SIC Ops Spec the SIC would not be able to log that flight. Nichols says the operator could decide not to use the autopilot and then the SIC would be required and therefore able to log the time. So I'll stand by my statement that the SIC must be required by TDC or the regs the flight is being operated under in order for them to log the time.
MarkerInbound is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT. The time now is 07:23.


1996-2012 The Professional Pilots Rumour Network

SEO by vBSEO 3.6.1