Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Freight Dogs
Reload this Page >

What is the operating life of B737-300F?

Wikiposts
Search
Freight Dogs Finally a forum for those midnight prowler types who utilise the unglamorous parts of airports that many of us never get to see. Freight Dogs is for pilots and crew who operate mostly without SLF.

What is the operating life of B737-300F?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24th Nov 2010, 08:00
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Nepal
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What is the operating life of B737-300F?

How many more years can a B737-300 fly which has already logged 61,000 hrs in flight? What would be the other restrictions for this highly utilized aircraft? Appreciate advices.
Spanner748 is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2010, 14:28
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UTC +8
Posts: 2,626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The operating life of an aeroplane is not defined by any "limitation," but rather by maintaining airworthiness. It consists of regulated maintenance and compliance with Manufacturers' Airworthiness Directives.

I have flown Boeing airframes with 100,000 hours. . . .

And many old timer DC-3s are still to be seen.
GlueBall is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2010, 15:56
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Nepal
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What is the significance of 'Cycles' then?
Spanner748 is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2010, 17:44
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: earth
Posts: 1,341
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A cycle is counted as one landing. There was another thread going in the tech log where the FAA proposed puting solid restrictions on flight time/cycles of aircraft. As it stands now, certain aircraft have deal breakers to take them OOS eg: I believe if you crack a wing spar on a DC8 the airframe is to be scrapped. I also know of an operator that is scrapping DC9's if damage is found to the aft pressure bulkhead.
grounded27 is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2010, 23:29
  #5 (permalink)  
Transparency International
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Denmark
Posts: 747
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not an answer to the original question but keep an eye on this one:
https://www.faa.gov/news/press_relea...m?newsId=12137

Press Release – FAA Adopts “Comprehensive Solution” to Widespread Fatigue on Aging Aircraft

* Print
* Email

For Immediate Release

November 12, 2010
Contact: Les Dorr or Alison Duquette
Phone: 202-267-3883

WASHINGTON, D.C. – In a continuing effort to address aging aircraft issues, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has finalized a rule designed to protect most of today’s commercial planes and those designed in the future from structural damage as they age.

The new rule seeks to prevent “widespread fatigue damage” (WFD) by requiring aircraft manufacturers and certification applicants to establish a number of flight cycles or hours a plane can operate and be free from WFD without additional inspections for fatigue. Manufacturers have between 18 and 60 months to comply depending on the particular aircraft type.

Once manufacturers establish these limits, operators of affected aircraft must incorporate them into their maintenance programs within 30 to 72 months, depending on the model of aircraft. After the limit is in the maintenance program, operators cannot fly the aircraft beyond that point unless the FAA approves an extension of the limit.

“Safety is our highest priority. This rule provides a comprehensive approach to the problem of widespread fatigue in aging aircraft,” said U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood. “Requiring carriers to regularly inspect their aircraft for possible fatigue is essential to ensuring the highest levels of safety.”

“We’ve addressed the problem of aging aircraft with numerous targeted regulations and 100 airworthiness directives over the years,” said FAA Administrator Randy Babbitt. “This rule is a comprehensive solution to ensure the structural safety of today’s airliners and the airplanes of tomorrow.”

An airplane’s metallic structures are stressed and can develop cracks when they experience repeated loads such as the pressurization and depressurization that happens on every flight. While airlines regularly inspect aircraft for cracks exceeding a certain size, WFD involves aircraft developing numerous tiny cracks, none of which would have raised concerns individually but which together run the risk of joining up and impairing the structural integrity of the plane.

The new regulation applies to airliners with a takeoff weight of 75,000 lbs. and heavier. It also applies to all transport designs certificated in the future.

The affected models, totaling 4,198 U.S.-registered airplanes, are listed in the rule.

The FAA is working closely with the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) and other national authorities to harmonize this rule with their regulations as much as possible. EASA is now developing rulemaking to address WFD, and the FAA participates in that process.

The final rule is on display today at the Federal Register: http://www.ofr.gov/OFRUpload/OFRData/2010-28363_PI.pdf . It will be published in the Register Monday, November 15 at: Federal Register: Main Page.
dusk2dawn is offline  
Old 26th Nov 2010, 13:27
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: 4DME
Posts: 2,938
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 12 Posts
The type of cargo that you fly may also effect the life of your aircraft animal leakage for one example.
N707ZS is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.