Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Freight Dogs
Reload this Page >

Boeing rethinks 74-8

Wikiposts
Search
Freight Dogs Finally a forum for those midnight prowler types who utilise the unglamorous parts of airports that many of us never get to see. Freight Dogs is for pilots and crew who operate mostly without SLF.

Boeing rethinks 74-8

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd Feb 2009, 19:04
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: A parallel universe.
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Boeing rethinks 74-8

Interesting article on Air Cargo Newshere.

With relatively low sales of the passenger version, one option is to make the 747-8 a standalone freighter but if cargo demand continues to fall further it may end up being scrapped completely.

Tank2Engine is offline  
Old 3rd Feb 2009, 23:32
  #2 (permalink)  
CR2

Top Dog
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Close to FACT
Age: 55
Posts: 2,098
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I hear that too...
The 400 has already become yesterday's 200. The first CV 400s are at the 100,000 hour mark... time flies...........
CR2 is offline  
Old 4th Feb 2009, 15:56
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: A parallel universe.
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
True, but are those 106 Freighter orders enough to keep the program viable? And if so, then what's all the fuss about?

Despite its more healthy orderbook, the -8F could also need to re-examining. The cargo industry is in the middle of a slump because of the downturn, and industry sources say several -8F customers are seeking to delay deliveries.
All in all, not a very positive development I guess.

T2E
Tank2Engine is offline  
Old 4th Feb 2009, 20:47
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Bed
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'd love to be a customer when Boeing 748F team gives a presentation, immediatley followed by the 744F conversion team. I bet you could play them off against each other all day. Only one winner in my opinion though!
EASY 69 is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2009, 10:57
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UTC +8
Posts: 2,626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The cargo slump is here and now; in 2009! But come mid 2010, airlines will be scrambling for new freighters to manage an unprecedented growth of air cargo. But not only because of the end of the recession cycle, but more so because of the population bomb. Ever more people wanting more things delivered next day, from perishables to durables to junk. Just as before.
GlueBall is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2009, 18:29
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: KLAX
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
because of the population bomb
Yes Glueball - that alone should do it, but I believe that 2010 may be perhaps too optimistic.

Also, the much cheaper maritime industry continues to encroach on airfreight. The new generation's of maritime fleet shipping will soon claim HKG to California travel time in as little as about 5 days.
L-38 is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2009, 20:05
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: ---
Posts: 282
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What if this is just Boeing powerplay in order not to have companies running in trying to get the best deal possible; like Ryanair are obviously are trying with the 737-800 and A320? Maybe they just want to maintain prices and not spoil the prices on their prize horse?
ray cosmic is offline  
Old 5th Feb 2009, 21:59
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The new generation's of maritime fleet shipping will soon claim HKG to California travel time in as little as about 5 days.
No argument about improved maritime shipping, however...HKG to west coast in five days?

A tad optimistic, me thinks.
411A is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2009, 00:17
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: tracy island
Posts: 240
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
especially if your shipping route is via the somalia coast....
shipping is a risky business these days- fly air cargo and get your
goods this year
acmi48 is offline  
Old 6th Feb 2009, 00:55
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Brisbane, QLD, Australia
Age: 43
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They will be interesting to trim !
5 Extra Pallets positions past the rear door!
3x Up top 2x Down
Mikeb744 is offline  
Old 8th Feb 2009, 10:06
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CommitedToStay

Nonetheless, they got some 106 firm orders for the 747-8F. (different article)
106 is a total number of orders for 747-8, that includes 28 pax aircraft and 78 freighters.
I understood last Friday Boeing has announced 747-8I (pax) programme will be scrapped, freighter to be continued. Lufthansa should be very happy
CargoOne is offline  
Old 8th Feb 2009, 10:14
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Europe
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In the worst scenario Boeing could manage to move the B747/800F orders to the B777/200F. However this scenario means for the next future no more nose-door cargo freighter.
FlyLowCost is offline  
Old 8th Feb 2009, 10:24
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I understood last Friday Boeing has announced 747-8I (pax) programme will be scrapped, freighter to be continued.
Not true.

And from Boeing's internal email:

You may have seen an e-mail circulating a supposed news story "reporting" that the 747-8 Intercontinental is being cancelled.

The story is a pure fabrication; Boeing has made no such announcement.
BOEING777X is offline  
Old 8th Feb 2009, 10:51
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BOEING777X

The story you posted a link on is not really reassuring regarding pax version, it is rather full of politically correct words which are usually used when you need to hide the truth for a while. And the story is a week old now.

The story is a pure fabrication; Boeing has made no such announcement (yet).
CargoOne is offline  
Old 8th Feb 2009, 11:01
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
...it is rather full of politically correct words which are usually used when you need to hide the truth for a while.
Of course, Airbus made similar statements when the A380F was effectively dropped when UPS/FedEx cancelled their orders. Its likely the phraseology is geared towards the SEC etc rather than mass media which is happy to feed in a frenzy off an email with no validity.

BOEING777X is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2009, 09:03
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UTC +8
Posts: 2,626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FlyLowCost . . .

The B744F nor the B748F are valid comparisons with the B772F/(B773F . . ?), neither by volume nor by payload-range.
GlueBall is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2009, 09:41
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Europe
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
GB I know it, but if for any reason Boeing cancels the B748F project the only valid alternative today is the B777F, since I don't think someone would buy again B744ERF.
FlyLowCost is offline  
Old 9th Feb 2009, 10:03
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
^

Neither 747-400F or -400ERF are available for sale any longer, quite sure that thats been the case for a while now.
BOEING777X is offline  
Old 13th Feb 2009, 06:27
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Boeing's Chief Engineer on the 747, Michael Teal believes the airplane has another 40 more years ahead of it.


I talked with him in Seattle and he revealed some interesting insight into the 747-8 program.
BOEING777X is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.