Cargo 360 Merger?

[Earl]

Open mouth insert foot

Think you might have asked for that one flyer.
The rest of the world may operate a little differently, but third level?

[layinlow]

What is a third level? One that has as many different variations of aircraft as were made. One who keeps maintenance to a minimum thus requiring crews to fly with ever increasing MELs. One who may change a tire or fix a problem only when the crew demands it. One who washes the aircraft once a year. One who keeps the crews wondering if their checks will clear. One who has an ever increasing changover in support personnel due to the low pay and therefore getting the lowest of the low in competence and expierence. One who ignores the CBA's making sure crew morale is low.
One who has to go out and beg for work rather than having the customer knocking on their doors. I worked for one, now I don't; and what a difference!!
You may call them third level, I call them bottom feeders.

[layinlow]

Ease up a litle HitList. I am sure these guys came to the dark side of cargo thinking they were hot stuff then learned they couldn't hold a candle to the "boys in the trenches".

[CR2]

Hitlist, mea culpa, I missed the post you mentioned. Interfering when warranted is my job as Mod, though I try as far as possible not to.
Nevertheless, to ALL of YOU: Personal attacks are out of order.

[ship's power]

What obnoxious bickering from a supposedly brotherhood of American aviator / freight dogs. . . . For whom does the bell toll? . . . The bell toll's for thee!

[Dutch74]

Is that it? The lawyers file a petition for flying past 60 and so for that the C360 guys are incompetent arrogant and inept?

OK.

[HitList]

-

The party is over, Elvis has left the building and only the clowns remain.

Oak Hill the main investor of C360 has chosen to cut the deal with SAI for excellent reasons.

Anybody who cares about facts, can check the C360 filings with the DOT and the C360 ineptness is crystal clear.

( The facts are readily available to all those who are able and qualified
to read them thru the
dms.dot.gov from 04/05/2005 to 08/02/2007
and know how to analyze the details, which clearly shows a consistent incompetence and lack of "seasoned experience" )

After all C360 was the latest, smallest edition and the least 747 experienced of all the ACMI USA cargo outfits but, apparently the most arrogant-yet clueless- that rapidly washed out of the party a big loser and a failure.

Never mind what the facts really are ex-DL boys, just toot your own horns here and at other forums, get the bags packed for the ego trip to nowhere but stop disparaging all those who are truly well seasoned, truly highly qualified and never toot their own horns.

The main "contributions" you ex-DL boys have made are to your retirement fund. Latest effort to keep your gravy train going was:
C360 VP-FltOps ex-DL boy filed a petition to the FAA, posted May 14 2007, for an exemption to age 60 rule to keep their crony pilots flying beyond 60 was, of course, "DENIED" and the FAA 3-page letter to C360 was posted on June 19 2007.


I'm getting a little tired of this. Thread closed. CR2