Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Freight Dogs
Reload this Page >

A330F Nosegear

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Freight Dogs Finally a forum for those midnight prowler types who utilise the unglamorous parts of airports that many of us never get to see. Freight Dogs is for pilots and crew who operate mostly without SLF.

A330F Nosegear

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22nd January 2007 | 13:26
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
From: U.S.A.
A330F Nosegear

This can't help the fuel specifics.......

http://www.flightglobal.com/articles...r-to-ease.html
Shore Guy is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd January 2007 | 07:39
  #2 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,640
Likes: 133
From: Paradise
Doesn't look too tidy either. I get the distinct impression that this is design by crisis.
chimbu warrior is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd January 2007 | 10:09
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
From: Global
Nahhhh.

You guy have it all wrong...

Just like me it is an old design....

And just like me its getting a bit saggy under the chin!


Ok ok, hat coat and I'm off.
international hog driver is offline  
Reply
Old 24th January 2007 | 14:24
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
From: Honolulu
Airbus can take credit for putting the worlds first "Chin Strap" on an airliner. Setting the Standards indeed!
Whale Rider is offline  
Reply
Old 24th January 2007 | 21:41
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
From: Kermedecs
Worried about the esthetics or the functionality? There are plenty of examples of maunufacturers developing modifications to suit - take the b737 with the CFM nacelle (flatened on the bottom edge), so that boeing didn't have to redesign their wing/pylon and specifically the landing gear.

keeping the nose gear as a common part was the point (as highlited in the FI artical). Lowering it keeps the parts common and the chin fairing is there to cope with the aerodynamics, so far not rocket sceince...design by panic-not likely; design for operations, most likely

The reason the nose gear was lowered was to keep the freight loading platform level, so someone's done their home work at Airbus. Ask the freight loaders and Ops guys what they think of the cargo loading and turn around advantages
Thirty Eight South is offline  
Reply
Old 25th January 2007 | 00:22
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 626
Likes: 0
From: East of LGB
I don't know. I think I would leave it the way it is and put the cargo door in the aft. That way, you just place the pallet into one of the aft positions and then let it run to the front of the aircraft on it's own.

Saves cost and weight for a powered CHS.

Unloading? Just park on a hill.

Last edited by 11Fan; 25th January 2007 at 00:23. Reason: afterthought
11Fan is offline  
Reply
Old 27th January 2007 | 13:29
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
From: XUMAT
Originally Posted by chimbu warrior
Doesn't look too tidy either. I get the distinct impression that this is design by crisis.
Any more rubbish you care to share with us?

It saves the necessity of having to redesign the strut and also the cabin floor levelling problem. The nosegear remains common with the A330 passenger variant.

Yep, crisis design....
Whitehatter is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.