Contract Compliance Cancelled
 

Cancelling Contract compliance means that we no longer have to comply with the Terms of our contract.
So why should the company comply with their side of the contract?
The free for all season has now started... Good luck, and God bless us all.

To all those people who crossed the line you are infamous and never off the hook

Name one positive thing that contract compliance/ training ban achieved?

Smoglover, just remember that a number of our illustrious Austronauts are those black listed from Australia and their 1989 issue.

Simple answer... very little, as we should've complied and stuck to contract from day 1 of our employment.
The flaw was the lack of ban on overtime. Had that been in place then we may have got something out of it.
Too late now. We just let it slip away. Shame really

Interesting take on that. I would have thought complying with the terms of your contract was a legal requirement, not dictated by a union leader.

When do we get new lanyards? Will they be “rainbow” coloured this time?

isn't it Pink month??

Take 25 % of your annual salary and have a good look at that number.

This is what the vote that lead to CC has cost you.

And counting.

Sam. You can't say that BUT the percentage is about right.

Aaaaaand here we go again.
Sam, the guy, who is complaining about “tired old arguments” stating and assuming that the same group of people who fired 49 pilots, are complicit in 2 deaths, perjured themselves in court, violated multiple aspects of his contract, tore up your rostering practices, used and abused their pilots for decades would have paid him 25% more salary if we all would have just played nice.
STW, you are so full of it, and probably always will be.

No, not in the slightest bit correct and I was there in ‘89

As Jimmy Hoffer always said, "Once a scab, always a scab". But look what happened to Jimmy !

Piet, one question please. Did you join Cathay before or after the 49er incident?

You know the answer to that question, or at least you should.
Your point?

No, I don't know the answer, which is why I am asking.

I think he means he’s from after. (Hence the defensiveness)

What difference would that make? It happened. It was awful. It will forever stain CX. It is instructive about how we should view our employer. Yes, it was 19 years ago now. CX has changed, but I’m not sure for the better. The PR is slicker, but the core of the Company hasn’t changed all that much. You don’t have to be in CX for over two decades to know this.

I think you are both fully aware of the implications ;-)