Group redundacy, BS
DPA, proposing group seniority for redundancy?
WTF? |
Originally Posted by turnandburn
(Post 10887037)
DPA, proposing group seniority for redundancy?
WTF? Not that the latter two would have too much bearing on it. |
That sounds like a great idea. CX bought out KA in 2006 I think, so all KA employees should be below the most junior CX employee on that date.:)
Careful what you wish for... |
Originally Posted by turnandburn
(Post 10887037)
DPA, proposing group seniority for redundancy?
WTF? I haven't read what you're writing in the communication we received from the DPA. What I understand with the proposal is that pilots from the group should be offered any job opening in the 4 airlines before external recruitment. HKE hired pilots 3 months ago and they will keep there jobs when you might be sacked after 20 years of work with KA, same applying for CX. KA is not fighting against CX or any other airline owned by Swire but our union is suggesting a fair approach to dismissal and recruitment across the group. I don't think KA is more at risk than CX for redundancies, If China open the gates we're back flying. CX will need many travel bublles before it can resume operations |
At least dpa is proposing something, sweet fa from the aoa.
|
Agreed, at least the DPA is doing SOMETHING! Whether it is right or wrong???
The HKAOA is paralyzed between the interests of expats and the prodigal children who want their inheritance early. |
What I don’t get is why are they even showing their cards when the deck hasn’t even been dealt?
|
The poker analogy is apt. Either they are hopeless poker players, or they are throwing the "hail mary" pass in the dying seconds of the football game. I do particularly like the "transfer to another group airline on original COS" and "no COS changes for KA pilots". Ballsy. Ultimately, I think it demonstrates the desperation that is prevalent in their ranks.
|
Really like how KA is trying to throw everyone else under the bus and keep what’s best for them
|
Originally Posted by cxorcist
(Post 10887307)
Agreed, at least the DPA is doing SOMETHING! Whether it is right or wrong???
The HKAOA is paralyzed between the interests of expats and the prodigal children who want their inheritance early. |
Originally Posted by WeelardPassord
(Post 10887338)
Really like how KA is trying to throw everyone else under the bus and keep what’s best for them
If HKE is going to be the big winner taking narrow body flying, why wouldn't the DPA try and secure transfers for possible redundant pilots? From what I've read here over the years, that option would be beneath CX pilots. |
Originally Posted by hkgfooey
(Post 10887242)
The source would be the "Proposals to Cathay Dragon" document dated September 10 by the DPA. (the one that is not endorsed confidential or copyright, and has done the rounds on social media, no point trying to deny it does not exist).
The DPA proposal advocates - no forced redundancies for KA pilots - no COS changes for KA pilots - $65,000 pm allowances while on SLV - transfer to another Group airline on current COS - original group date of joining in new Group airline for salary and benefits - seniority based on years of service in CX group - 18 months pay plus 3 months housing for voluntary separation |
Its strange that employees worry about Group redundancies whilst the leaders/owners play games.
I suggest you google Sasha Swires Diaries to see whats important to them. |
listen for the numbers
|
Originally Posted by WeelardPassord
(Post 10887338)
Really like how KA is trying to throw everyone else under the bus and keep what’s best for them
has come back to bite them in the ass now. "You reep what you sow". |
You've been consistently wrong, in what were not inside snippets, but predictions intent on unsettling or inflaming. Here you go again- this is just another example.
Whatever will happen has nothing to do with with where the HKAOA/ DPA relationship sits now or previously. Personally, I never understood why we were not closer, in better days when our expansion was seeing very rapid commands. But as with the DPA probably pursuing HKE narrow body slots for redundant pilots, the CX union has had little interest in narrow body flying for members. |
What good does the DPA have going after any slots with HKE? Last I heard was 60 something CPT and FO in training there, all 321 to Alice and one route with 3 flights a week. That sounds like slots are filled for the foreseeable future.
|
I'd be guessing, it's in anticipation of some sort of 2021 recovery, with a probable expansion of HKE over KA leisure routes.
|
Who cares what the dpa proposed.... fact is, the company has a very good idea of what they need to do by now, and it will be done, regardless of any proposal put forward by either the aoa or dpa.
|
Originally Posted by unitedabx
(Post 10891352)
KA pilots and DPA have always done their own thing and for the large part did better than CX pilots and HKAOA. This "I'm alright Jack, f*** you" attitude
has come back to bite them in the ass now. "You reep what you sow". |
|
Thanks Gnads!
b. |
Originally Posted by destiny78
(Post 10891714)
Its easier to just let go of 1200 pilots they dont need rather than to not have them fly and pay them half pay.
that's just a guess, only time will tell. |
Originally Posted by fly1981
(Post 10891960)
easier in the short term, no one can predict when travel will return to full swing, it could be next week, it could be in 2026. With the 3rd runway well ahead of schedule, slots will be on the market soon, with competitors chomping at the bit. I imagine the group will be wanting to maintain resources as far as possible. Substantial long term pay cut across the board would make sense, followed by redundancy as a last resort.
that's just a guess, only time will tell. Btw, it’s “champing”, not “chomping”. |
Originally Posted by unitedabx
(Post 10891352)
KA pilots and DPA have always done their own thing and for the large part did better than CX pilots and HKAOA. This "I'm alright Jack, f*** you" attitude
has come back to bite them in the ass now. "You reep what you sow". Apart from doing our own thing what was it we were supposed to be doing for you United? As you are saying we are about to be 'bitten in the ass' could you please give us the benefit of your inside knowledge because we all want to know what the big plan is for the Dragonair scum. Are you saying CX pilots will be exempt from the changes coming next month? News flash for you United: You're not special. None of us are, we're just group employees. The company will do what they need to do and there is nothing the HKAOA or the DPA can do about it other than sit and wait for the update next month. Good luck to everyone in the group, including you United. |
Originally Posted by MPPCAG
(Post 10891978)
Hmmm. Do I detect a hint of hostility towards the KA boys and girls?!
Apart from doing our own thing what was it we were supposed to be doing for you United? As you are saying we are about to be 'bitten in the ass' could you please give us the benefit of your inside knowledge because we all want to know what the big plan is for the Dragonair scum. Are you saying CX pilots will be exempt from the changes coming next month? News flash for you United: You're not special. None of us are, we're just group employees. The company will do what they need to do and there is nothing the HKAOA or the DPA can do about it other than sit and wait for the update next month. Good luck to everyone in the group, including you United. |
Originally Posted by fly1981
(Post 10891960)
easier in the short term, no one can predict when travel will return to full swing, it could be next week, it could be in 2026. With the 3rd runway well ahead of schedule, slots will be on the market soon, with competitors chomping at the bit. I imagine the group will be wanting to maintain resources as far as possible. It’s easy to make 1200 pilots redundant, when demand picks up, it’s not so easy to just get pilots back in the seat. Substantial long term pay cut across the board would make sense, followed by redundancy as a last resort.
that's just a guess, only time will tell. |
Originally Posted by fly1981
(Post 10891960)
easier in the short term, no one can predict when travel will return to full swing, it could be next week, it could be in 2026. With the 3rd runway well ahead of schedule, slots will be on the market soon, with competitors chomping at the bit. I imagine the group will be wanting to maintain resources as far as possible. It’s easy to make 1200 pilots redundant, when demand picks up, it’s not so easy to just get pilots back in the seat. Substantial long term pay cut across the board would make sense, followed by redundancy as a last resort.
that's just a guess, only time will tell. |
Originally Posted by Drc40
(Post 10891982)
Ummm No. No one can predict when travel will return but it definitely won’t be next week. That’s not a prediction, it’s a fact.
|
Originally Posted by ChrissyPrezzie
(Post 10891990)
Strategically speaking, if the ultimate goal is to save the company while replacing all expats with local workforce, this might be a golden opportunity for them. You just can't come up with any better reason other than being made redundant.
|
How will they go about a LIFO? Dosent make sense for company to get rid of cos18 guys , defeats the whole purpose of a new COS. Plus majority them is on 747.
|
Originally Posted by WeelardPassord
(Post 10892039)
How will they go about a LIFO? Dosent make sense for company to get rid of cos18 guys , defeats the whole purpose of a new COS. Plus majority them is on 747.
If someone was willing to sign onto COS18 I can assure you they will get numbers signing COS20 to protect themselves. |
Which people would you like us to enjoy ?
|
herewego75.
A very good post. I agree. Follow the contracts, LIFO. Get on with life. Things will eventually turnaround when governments realize that Covid is not the bubonic plague and can be dealt with more rationally, that money doesn’t grow on trees, and economies reopen. At some point, in the not too distant future, expect to be recalled/rehired in seniority when things turnaround (they always do). Come back at that time if it suits you, otherwise continue down a new path in life. |
Effectively increasing the block hour unit cost in this environment is not something the accountants would have recommended.
The recent murmurs of everyone getting their notice and them offering COS20 -1200 or so pilots (whether they be redundant or on furlough, whatever that may mean) just sounds a lot more like a corporate solution given the amount of flying we will all be doing for the foreseeable future. We will see soon enough, either way it is going to suck. I however don’t see them keeping the same contracts for everyone whilst they cut off the cheapest part of their workforce. It might not be fair, but life isn’t fair is it. |
Originally Posted by unitedabx
(Post 10891979)
I couldn't give a toss about KA or the DPA and vice versa.
|
herewego75
"It seems that 20-25% has been the standard in the industry. Considering CX will bounce back strong I predict about 20% of pilot cuts across both KA and CX. "
Dreaming ??? Without question you cannot compare CX to "industry standard"... For example, US airlines (pre China Virus) would have 20000+ domestic flights PER DAY. How many does CX have ? It's unquestionable fact that international flights will be the hardest hit AND be the last sector to recover with some economists saying "if ever" Australia, for example, "may not" allow international flights until July 2021 !!! What then, back to normal overnight? Additionally, if you wish to call KA mainland flights "domestic", that sector is 100% controlled by the thugs up North which have ZERO empathy for poor old Swires . Sad, every way you look at it.. #CXIT |
Originally Posted by raven11
(Post 10892319)
herewego75.
A very good post. I agree. Follow the contracts, LIFO. Get on with life. Things will eventually turnaround when governments realize that Covid is not the bubonic plague and can be dealt with more rationally, that money doesn’t grow on trees, and economies reopen. At some point, in the not too distant future, expect to be recalled/rehired in seniority when things turnaround (they always do). Come back at that time if it suits you, otherwise continue down a new path in life. |
Originally Posted by WeelardPassord
(Post 10892039)
How will they go about a LIFO? Dosent make sense for company to get rid of cos18 guys , defeats the whole purpose of a new COS. Plus majority them is on 747.
1. At the moment a HKG S/O is costing more than an Oz based Capt. 2. Company doesn't need any S/Os at all. If there isn't enough work for all the pilots, they need to reduce pilot numbers. You can operate without any S/Os, but you need Capts and Relief F/Os. How will they go about it? Not rocket science. Last In First Off for each seperate pilot body until the desired number of pilots is reached. |
Originally Posted by controlledrest
(Post 10892617)
Does make sense for two reasons:
1. At the moment a HKG S/O is costing more than an Oz based Capt. 2. Company doesn't need any S/Os at all. If there isn't enough work for all the pilots, they need to reduce pilot numbers. You can operate without any S/Os, but you need Capts and Relief F/Os. How will they go about it? Not rocket science. Last In First Off for each separate pilot body until the desired number of pilots is reached. Totally agree with your post and logic. Whilst it is very hard for our newer pilots to accept that redundancies are the way forward this is the only way. Park 30% of your airframes for the foreseeable future and you need 30% fewer pilots. Each crew needs a captain and at least an RQ first officer. SO's are not required at all, however inexpensive to employ. As for the DEFO's, well they knew the rules when they signed up. LIFO but at least you got a jumbo rating for your troubles. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:23. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.