Flaenders - cxorcist
Cxorcist
in regards to your comment about JL - his integrity is without question IMO. And like him, I don't do anonymous! |
Originally Posted by McNugget
(Post 9722556)
Actually, most airlines recognise SO time once you're P1 rated.
And no, my bunk time isn't anywhere near 50%. Glad you know my logbook better than me. |
aaaaaahhhhhhhh..... THis is so frustrating..... I just want this over with.... I just want to finally be able to enjoy my job again........The union is useless I am sorry to say. I just hope they can get my ass out of jail faster than they can negotiate a stop to CC and TB.:confused::confused::confused::confused::confused::confus ed::confused::confused::confused::confused::confused::confus ed::zzz::zzz::zzz::zzz:
|
Anotherday.
To be fair, 'upgrade' from TC to TCC is NOT an upgrade and carries no increment, NOR is it voluntary, as ALL TC's HAVE to become TCC'S. NOW, volunteering for training, or to go TCC to STC etc., that is a different kettle of fish. Glad I'm going! |
Anotherday: EVERY member of the HKAOA that took an upgrade in training after May 2015 is no longer a member of the HKAOA. Fact!
|
Anotherday, you're obviously not in the AoA and obviously a management troll.
I can think of 3 scabs who have been expelled (or resigned from the union just before being given the boot) after they took a training job or upgraded from within. And don't worry, I'm quite sure the rest of us members will remember their names for a looooong time. |
Originally Posted by Anotherday
(Post 9736181)
Curtain,
I can't think of a single member who has taken an upgrade in training that has been expelled. Can think of plenty who have gone TC to TCC and TCC to STC. But I'm just a troll, what would I know. So every AOA member who has upgraded in training in the last 2 and a bit years is out of the AOA? What about all the guys in Hong Kong who took Command upgrades while guys on bases turned them down to stay true to CC. How's that fair. Pick and choose, it appears. I'm not sure how delaying command on the base is the same as delaying command in Hong Kong.... lots of people were doing that anyway, seems silly to then say it was for "staying true to" contract compliance. |
Nobody on a base deferred their command to stay true to CC. It was to stay true to lifestyle and their children's upbringing! Anyone who claims different is full of BS.
|
Quite simple really, fly with the based guys, talk to them. Those with families happily settled are generally staying on the base, those whose kids have grown up, several are coming back to Hong Kong for their command. Not a word about contract compliance from anyone of them in their thinking process.
their
Originally Posted by Anotherday
(Post 9738133)
Yep Hugo and you know this how? And no one turned down the 330 course to stay on the 777 because the type change had them worried, it was all for lifestyle.
|
I concur. Lifestyle is the main reason.
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:25. |
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.