Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Fragrant Harbour
Reload this Page >

Why would you come to CX?

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Fragrant Harbour A forum for the large number of pilots (expats and locals) based with the various airlines in Hong Kong. Air Traffic Controllers are also warmly welcomed into the forum.

Why would you come to CX?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th February 2024 | 21:54
  #41 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 381
Likes: 7
From: CLK
Originally Posted by Oasis
; They should be paying the captains 30 percent MORE, not less!
No, a 100% increase would put the CN back at COS99 after the 50% COVID cut.

Then discussion should continue on real COSILIV increases….

Dont believe the hype, and I know, “tell ‘I’m he’s dreamin…”

Last edited by Senior Pilot; 10th February 2024 at 20:46. Reason: Quote
Farman Biplane is offline  
Old 8th February 2024 | 00:28
  #42 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 192
Likes: 17
From: By the sea
Sorry Raven, but give me two brand new SO's over 3 man long haul any day.
pill is offline  
Old 8th February 2024 | 06:31
  #43 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 103
Likes: 2
From: Lonely planet
Originally Posted by cygnet78
Those who said EK earn more than CX are just liar. They dont know how low EK pay is. For those who are interested in CX , please keep applying. Big changes coming soon after task force set up by govt and CX. They will take everybody.
True my mate at EK says as 380 FO he’s clears 8200 USD pm with all the allowances and OT etc. But his kids go school for free, free housing and utilities. So he’s on about 66k HKD pm disposable income.
Oddball77 is offline  
Old 8th February 2024 | 06:54
  #44 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 428
Likes: 20
From: HKG
Originally Posted by raven11
...Pound for pound….an airline would be better off purchasing fuel.
Not if that airline was CX and they had hedged.
controlledrest is offline  
Old 8th February 2024 | 18:04
  #45 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 157
Likes: 3
From: uk
Raven , you raise a very valid point , but safety sadly is driven by lip service and money .If RH was a manager of repute he would not have needed input from the training dept he would have taken action on his own on the merit of the issue.
so let’s take a worse case scenario , a brand new SO is on his own in the flight deck whilst the FO takes a toilet break . Explosive decompression occurs , the supplementary CA sitting in the jump seat has no Oxygen supply so has passed out by the time the FO tries to get back in .
Thus the SO may have to manage the entire process on his own not something that fills me confidence .
joblow is offline  
Old 9th February 2024 | 12:03
  #46 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 552
Likes: 22
From: Hong Kong
Joblow….I’ll take your example one step further. Time of useful consciousness at 41,000 feet in an explosive decompression is less than 10 seconds and requires pressure breathing oxygen. In your example, the brand new second officer and young cabin attendant in the cockpit fail to extract and get their masks on in less than 10 seconds….
The relief crew outside the cockpit will not have pressure breathing oxygen available to them as they attempt to use emergency door entry procedures to bypass the locked cockpit door and they succumb to hypoxia. The aircraft continues to fly until it runs out of fuel….

i raised this very scenario many times to Flight Ops management to no avail…..because…safety was their top priority.
raven11 is offline  
Old 9th February 2024 | 14:38
  #47 (permalink)  
10 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 25
Likes: 1
From: Horley
Ever heard of the Auto Descent ? The SO will do just fine …
nicoli is offline  
Old 9th February 2024 | 14:58
  #48 (permalink)  
5 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 86
Likes: 64
From: Skokie, Ill
Originally Posted by nicoli
Ever heard of the Auto Descent ? The SO will do just fine …
Only the 350 has auto emergency descent. The 777,747 & 330 don’t.
Verbal Kint is offline  
Old 9th February 2024 | 20:25
  #49 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2024
Posts: 51
Likes: 2
From: Hong Kong
Will an overweight 60ish year old immersed in his Golf magazine be quicker than a 22 year old SO? I would call it a toss-up :-))

Last edited by Meursault; 9th February 2024 at 21:39.
Meursault is offline  
Old 9th February 2024 | 23:54
  #50 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 190
Likes: 4
From: asia
Well, given that on more than one occasion we've had unaccompanied SO's sit petrified and completely unreactive through TCAS RA's in the cruise, my money is on the 60 something Skipper every time!
buggaluggs is offline  
Old 10th February 2024 | 03:05
  #51 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2022
Posts: 27
Likes: 1
From: Hong Kong
An SO should have more exposure to emergency descents in training. This said, the problem is the lack of exposure to actually operating the aircraft, which also results in a lack of engagement on the job. It's one thing to know the procedure in the sim, and another to not get jittery when something actually happens and the guy in the seat isn't completely comfortable in the aircraft.
Boulanger is offline  
Old 10th February 2024 | 03:50
  #52 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
From: New York
Originally Posted by Meursault
Will an overweight 60ish year old immersed in his Golf magazine be quicker than a 22 year old SO? I would call it a toss-up :-))
That statement is so wrong on many levels.
It makes me wonder if you are actually a pilot at all.

Perhaps you are not as smart as you think you are.

Last edited by Frank W. Abagnale; 10th February 2024 at 04:26.
Frank W. Abagnale is offline  
Old 10th February 2024 | 05:42
  #53 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
From: the world
God, some of you guys have absolutely no idea.
backspace is offline  
Old 10th February 2024 | 05:47
  #54 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 190
Likes: 4
From: asia
Angry

Originally Posted by magenta magnet
The odds of an explosive decompression in the cockpit are about 1/billion or even more. If that did happen then you'd have 10 seconds consciousness, BUT you'd probably die from frostbite, as well as your top lips being ripped off and your lungs exploding as 900kph wind hits them, plus you wouldn't be able to see anything anyway.. but a "normal" explosive decompression somewhere on the plane would still take a long time to suck out all the air, so the 10 seconds isn't really accurate and you would have plenty time to don your mask and get the old Captain and Co-Pilot to hurry back into the cockpit for any help you may need...

I'm pretty sure a SO can work out how to descend the plane without ripping the wings off her


Please tell me you don't fly jets for a living!.....
buggaluggs is offline  
Old 10th February 2024 | 06:41
  #55 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 95
Likes: 19
From: On a few nerves apparently
Wow wow wow...

Who was it said "you better keep your mouth shut and appear stupid rather than open it and remove all doubt".

The levels of green lack of knowledge and understanding in some of the above comments are astonishing. I'd rather do a rapid descent all alone by myself any day than have one like these sitting next to me attempting to help.

If these are cathay pilots, it truly shows the scary low levels of knowledge and experience present on cathay flight decks today.


VforVENDETTA is offline  
Old 10th February 2024 | 11:58
  #56 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2024
Posts: 51
Likes: 2
From: Hong Kong
In the last 50 years, on western civil aircraft, how many sudden cases of loss of cabin pressure and subsequent application of 10-20 sec of TUC? Now consider the number of flights where it did not happen. Then consider the total flight time of all flights globally and put it in relation to the total time of a long haul flight with an inexperienced SO alone in the seat.

I think Magenta is not far off, less than one in a billion would be my guess.


Last edited by Meursault; 10th February 2024 at 12:30.
Meursault is offline  
Old 10th February 2024 | 12:51
  #57 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 124
Likes: 54
From: Australia
"magenta magnet" awesome troll bro ! You nearly had me ! I love a good wind up too.
stevieboy330 is offline  
Old 10th February 2024 | 13:12
  #58 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 552
Likes: 22
From: Hong Kong
Meursault
Now give us the stats on the chances of loosing an engine during a heavy weight take off precisely at V1…..

It’s the limited thinking like yours that led to the disastrous development of the 737 Max. How’s that working out for Boeing?

Hard times create strong men, strong men create good times, good times create weak men, and weak men create hard times.

raven11 is offline  
Old 10th February 2024 | 13:19
  #59 (permalink)  
15 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 552
Likes: 22
From: Hong Kong
V for Vendetta

Totally agree.

Just before I retired I had a line SO on a check ride that was completely unaware of the requirement for pressure breathing above 35,000’; he was also adamant that the concept of “Time of Useful Consciousness” regarding the onset of hypoxia in a high altitude decompression was a myth because he could hold his breath for over a minute…..

He was a fully rated P2X line pilot.

As I posted earlier…what could go wrong?
raven11 is offline  
Old 10th February 2024 | 13:30
  #60 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2024
Posts: 51
Likes: 2
From: Hong Kong
Originally Posted by raven11
Meursault
Now give us the stats on the chances of loosing an engine during a heavy weight take off precisely at V1…..

It’s the limited thinking like yours that led to the disastrous development of the 737 Max. How’s that working out for Boeing?

Hard times create strong men, strong men create good times, good times create weak men, and weak men create hard times.
So you are saying probability doesn't matter? Or that the estimate is wrong? And where is the association to the 737 Max? Or to an engine fail at V1? I am discussing a specific threat in cruise with an SO as sole occupant. If you disagree with the proposed ratio you are welcome to offer an alternative number. Maybe I am wrong. But simply stating my thinking is limited is, well, quite limited indeed. And what is the meaning of "weak" and "hard times" in this context? Is trading insults without substance "strong"?


Meursault is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.