Wikiposts
Search
Fragrant Harbour A forum for the large number of pilots (expats and locals) based with the various airlines in Hong Kong. Air Traffic Controllers are also warmly welcomed into the forum.

Air Asia report

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3rd Dec 2015, 14:16
  #41 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: overthere
Posts: 3,040
Received 26 Likes on 10 Posts
Oasis,

Isn't the non bus pilot argument that moving bits are needed to show both pilots what is happening? That did not occur in the Flash airlines, Ethiopian, Turkish nor Asiana Boeing crashes. If the yoke or thrust levers move or not makes no difference if you aren't a very good pilot. One needs to be able assess what is happening, and decide what needs to be done. This is the factor that is common in both Airbus and Boeing accidents.
Pilots aren't trained to do pilot stuff anymore. CBT teaches systems, line training makes sure you are safe in normal Ops. SIM Training is to the lowest legal requirements. Pilots don't gain experience outside of airlines anymore. The profession has been dumbed down, and the result is that when things go slightly wrong successful outcomes are no longer predictable. This crew would have splashed a Boeing if they were sitting in one.
donpizmeov is offline  
Old 3rd Dec 2015, 16:25
  #42 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Krug departure, Merlot transition
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A vs BS

Pilots aren't trained to do pilot stuff anymore. CBT teaches systems, line training makes sure you are safe in normal Ops. SIM Training is to the lowest legal requirements. Pilots don't gain experience outside of airlines anymore. The profession has been dumbed down, and the result is that when things go slightly wrong successful outcomes are no longer predictable. This crew would have splashed a Boeing if they were sitting in one.
While during my years of flying Airbus I indeed found that the non-moving thrust levers and the non-linked sidesticks did introduce a layer of opacity (and potential source of confusion) to operations, the bottom line is that Donpizmeov is spot on: when the chips are down a well-trained and experienced crew will probably save the day on either product A or B, a poor one will become a statistic.

Our profession is being dumbed down by beancounters who chillingly factor in the cost of a hull loss vs. the cost of proper training or the cost of hiring experienced pilots.
main_dog is online now  
Old 3rd Dec 2015, 23:52
  #43 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Whichever aircraft is better, and i have a fair bit of time on both Boeings and Airbus, the crux of this is the pure inability to fly straight and level…..which on an airbus, when the AP disconnects, requires you to do absolutely F*** all but sit there, loosely cover the sidestick and move nothing in the short term.
Hugo Peroni the IV is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.