Master Roster
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
From: Hong Kong
I'm not sure they will lock it out either.
After all, didn't the DFO basically say that he expects everyone to continue working "according to established practise and custom"? I would expect that that would apply to him and his crew controllers as well!
Plus, how do you let the master roster be viewed by the Brits and Aussies? Taking it away would surely be a breach of the "good faith bargaining".
After all, didn't the DFO basically say that he expects everyone to continue working "according to established practise and custom"? I would expect that that would apply to him and his crew controllers as well!
Plus, how do you let the master roster be viewed by the Brits and Aussies? Taking it away would surely be a breach of the "good faith bargaining".
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 513
Likes: 0
From: HK
Been done before. They do not shut out you viewing your roster just everyone else's, so that you cannot data troll. Nothing to do with "good bargaining" either, data privacy.
You can also elect not to show your roster to anyone.
You can also elect not to show your roster to anyone.
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 186
Likes: 2
From: hong kong
Unfortunately he is arrogant and stupid, a bad combination. And now clearly he is running scared. So in a volt-face the good cop, bad cop combo will no doubt put out her massage tomorrow. Me thinks that the fog is clearing and that perhaps cc is beginning to have an effect.
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 157
Likes: 3
From: uk
Clearly they are worried that the minority of G day workers are going to be busted and for fear of being outed refuse to work on g days ,so it looks like CC is having an effect already I must admit I didn't expect them to close the master roster this soon after the start maybe the impact is being felt earlier and quicker than we expected
But never mind the master roster what happened to my Feb roster its 10:30 and it still isn't out
But never mind the master roster what happened to my Feb roster its 10:30 and it still isn't out
Last edited by joblow; 15th January 2015 at 13:24.
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 405
Likes: 3
From: The Cesspit
Unauthorized use of private data it is not.
Ever since RP04/07 was introduced, part of the condition was we were to have access to others roster (if they agree) to assist with swaps, proffers etc..
How you plan to use that data is a private matter. Much to CX's frustration, thought crime is science fiction.
How you use that data may be in breach of regs but there's no suggestion that has been the case.
Access to others rosters is not a convenience. It was a hard fought agreement.
CX can't remove the sections that are inconvenient (remember the former GMA PW's abortive efforts to remove proffering as it cost the company too much??)
Unless they want to go one for one.
They remove crew direct.
I go back to 700 hours.
That would definitely be worth abusing/intimidating some "crew notification", "G day hero" for.
The reality is, They are having serious problems writing a roster for the task at hand. The number of charters we've been turning down while pushing planes to remote corners of the airfield is getting a few senior managers/directors concerned. His scapegoat is the nasty pilots. His making an issue out of nothing as a distraction.
Ever since RP04/07 was introduced, part of the condition was we were to have access to others roster (if they agree) to assist with swaps, proffers etc..
How you plan to use that data is a private matter. Much to CX's frustration, thought crime is science fiction.
How you use that data may be in breach of regs but there's no suggestion that has been the case.
Access to others rosters is not a convenience. It was a hard fought agreement.
CX can't remove the sections that are inconvenient (remember the former GMA PW's abortive efforts to remove proffering as it cost the company too much??)
Unless they want to go one for one.
They remove crew direct.
I go back to 700 hours.
That would definitely be worth abusing/intimidating some "crew notification", "G day hero" for.
The reality is, They are having serious problems writing a roster for the task at hand. The number of charters we've been turning down while pushing planes to remote corners of the airfield is getting a few senior managers/directors concerned. His scapegoat is the nasty pilots. His making an issue out of nothing as a distraction.
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,777
Likes: 9
From: Blighty
Curtain Rod.
There are a lot of inaccuracies in your comments about KA - particularly the time to command at KA. The latest commander has only been in the company 2.5 years! And there are three airlines in the CX group. Be careful what you wish for!
There are a lot of inaccuracies in your comments about KA - particularly the time to command at KA. The latest commander has only been in the company 2.5 years! And there are three airlines in the CX group. Be careful what you wish for!
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,777
Likes: 9
From: Blighty
The "sweet deal" was more about the numbers leaving and not about CC. KA had been in CC for about three years, and there's no doubt people were getting fed up - and pay was of course static. But retention was the main aim of the pay increase.
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,777
Likes: 9
From: Blighty
And seniority accrues more leave.
1. Pay
2. 10 weeks annual leave
3. 25 year housing with a one time re-finance allowed
4. Medial paid for
5. University paid for kids
6. Shoes paid for
7. Passport renewal paid for
8. Travel fund
2. 10 weeks annual leave
3. 25 year housing with a one time re-finance allowed
4. Medial paid for
5. University paid for kids
6. Shoes paid for
7. Passport renewal paid for
8. Travel fund