Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Fragrant Harbour
Reload this Page >

UV levels and flying study

Fragrant Harbour A forum for the large number of pilots (expats and locals) based with the various airlines in Hong Kong. Air Traffic Controllers are also warmly welcomed into the forum.

UV levels and flying study

Old 24th Dec 2014, 03:31
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: VHHH
Posts: 199
UV levels and flying study

Airplane windshields allow UV radiation to enter the cockpit, giving pilots a dose similar to dangerous levels found in tanning beds!

The daily commute for airline pilots could be the equivalent of riding to work in a tanning bed, suggests a new study. Airplane windshields can block some ultraviolet (UV) radiation found in sunlight, but a significant amount passes directly into the cockpit. This puts the crew at risk of developing melanoma, which is the most serious form of skin cancer.

In the study, published in JAMA Dermatology, researchers from the University of California, San Francisco, compared the level of UV radiation in the cockpit of a general aviation turboprop airplane with the dose produced by a standard tanning bed.

Almost an Hour of Flying Equals 20 Minutes of Tanning
The researchers took measurements in a plane at several elevations in San Jose, California, and Las Vegas, Nevada. While the plane's windshield blocked most of the UV-B radiation, it allowed UV-A radiation, which is the same type produced by the tanning bed tested, to pass through.

"Pilots flying for 56.6 minutes at 30,000 feet receive the same amount of UV-A [cancer-causing] effective radiation as that from a 20-minute tanning bed session," the authors write in the paper.

Most commercial aircraft fly at this altitude, where the level of UV radiation is double that found at ground level. UV radiation reaching the cockpit can also increase when the plane flies over thick cloud cover or snow fields, which can reflect up to 85 percent of the UV radiation.

The greater UV-A radiation exposure in the cockpit results from the design of the airplane's windshield. Tests have shown that plastic and glass windshields can block most of the UV-B radiation. However, up to 54 percent of UV-A radiation is able to get through the windshields, with plastic blocking more of this type.

Strong Link Between UV Rays and Melanoma

The link between UV-A radiation and melanoma is well established. According to the American Academy of Dermatology, one in 50 Americans will develop melanoma in their lifetime. Excessive exposure to UV radiation is a preventable cause of melanoma. People who live closer to the equator, where the sun is more intense, and those who use tanning beds are at an increased risk.

Skin Cancer

In previous research, published in JAMA Dermatology, an analysis of 19 studies showed that pilots are twice as likely as the general population to develop melanoma and 42 percent more likely to die from it.

Additional research has found that this increased risk exists even when taking into account the pilots' other sun exposure, including their history of sunburns, use of tanning beds, and numbers of sunny vacations.

The new study, however, is the first one to directly test the level of UV radiation that pilots are exposed to in the cockpit. Because only one plane was tested, though, the researchers suggest future studies be conducted on more types of aircraft. This could establish safety guidelines that would limit UV exposure for pilots.

"We believe that better UV protection on aircraft windshields is necessary to offer cabin crew a hazard-free work environment," the authors write. "We strongly recommend the use of sunscreens and periodical skin checks for pilots and cabin crew."
CokeZero is offline  
Old 24th Dec 2014, 08:30
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 288
Basal cell and squamous cell cancers are the long haul pilots curse. The generation now retiring or close to retirement are showing signs of over three times the average sentile for these skin cancers. SPF 50 is recommended for all in the cockpit but who..WHO ever slaps up??..the guys in mid career really do need to start ramping up better awareness so the regulators and the employers can come into line. I understand that Drs JF and RC began to focus in on this but as usual, it either suffocated from above or its controversy became a little too much for the regulator to handle.
Pucka is offline  
Old 24th Dec 2014, 11:21
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 1,114
Join the Airbus fleet...we only fly at night!
Frogman1484 is offline  
Old 24th Dec 2014, 12:10
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Krug departure, Merlot transition
Posts: 521
Or the freighter...

main_dog is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us Archive Advertising Cookie Policy Privacy Statement Terms of Service

Copyright 2018 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.