Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Fragrant Harbour
Reload this Page >

HKG 25R/07L high speed exits

Wikiposts
Search
Fragrant Harbour A forum for the large number of pilots (expats and locals) based with the various airlines in Hong Kong. Air Traffic Controllers are also warmly welcomed into the forum.

HKG 25R/07L high speed exits

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th Jun 2014, 08:29
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,167
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Mmmmmmmmm

Just heard about that reverse event...

Seem he no longer works for us...
nitpicker330 is offline  
Old 10th Jun 2014, 14:58
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Where You Aren't
Posts: 506
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Clarence, idle or full reverse makes f%@kall difference to the landing distance unless the runway is contaminated...
Oval3Holer is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2014, 16:27
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The Pole
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The individual concerned does still in fact work for CX.

MACH.88
MACH.88 is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2014, 17:30
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: the land of chocolate
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Surprising.
Oasis is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2014, 20:36
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: my desk
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Actually what is surprising is that he lost his seat given that a certain TC managed to keep his ratings after the ORD cargo fire debacle. What is worse - exceeding a limitation of the aircraft and not reporting it or skipping an item in an emergency checklist to satisfy the commercial side of the operation?
Thunderbird4 is offline  
Old 11th Jun 2014, 21:34
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Brexitland
Posts: 1,146
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
What is the story?
Arfur Dent is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2014, 03:34
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: hong kong
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The individual concerned does still in fact work for CX.

No, he does not. I have it on very good authority that he has retired.

However, I agree that the case of a TC keeping his rating is of far more interest - and concern.
AnAmusedReader is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2014, 04:27
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,167
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Lets just say it apparently involved a three point turn on the Runway.....yes a three pointer!!

See, can be done. What would Boeing know.
nitpicker330 is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2014, 04:46
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: the land of chocolate
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Can't agree with you thunderbird, and why compare the two cases?
They have no similarities.
Oasis is offline  
Old 12th Jun 2014, 16:50
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The Pole
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If he has retired, then why is the individual working in June??

Whether they get fired, demoted, or retire, what difference does it make in the grander scheme of things?

MACH.88
MACH.88 is offline  
Old 13th Jun 2014, 02:39
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: hong kong
Posts: 241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Coz the roster for June came out before he left. Check who did his flights.
AnAmusedReader is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2014, 12:01
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Here, there, and everywhere
Posts: 1,123
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by Thunderbird4
Actually what is surprising is that he lost his seat given that a certain TC managed to keep his ratings after the ORD cargo fire debacle. What is worse - exceeding a limitation of the aircraft and not reporting it or skipping an item in an emergency checklist to satisfy the commercial side of the operation?
The ORD fire was handled as best was thought possible at the moment. The limitation exceedence was small I believe. I believe it was said that the step in the emergency checklist was not significant.
punkalouver is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2014, 13:50
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: 3.5 from TD
Age: 47
Posts: 1,042
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The ORD fire was handled as best was thought possible at the moment. The limitation exceedence was small I believe. I believe it was said that the step in the emergency checklist was not significant.
Uh, wrong. It was f*cked up, plain and simple.

As an airline, we still have a lot of pilots with the misconception that commercial comes in front of safety. This will work great until it doesn't, at which point we will have one of those accidents people discuss years later in every CRM course across the industry.

The fact this still exists at such a major airline tells you how broken the internal workings are.
Sqwak7700 is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2014, 14:51
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Here, there, and everywhere
Posts: 1,123
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by Sqwak7700
Uh, wrong. It was f*cked up, plain and simple.

As an airline, we still have a lot of pilots with the misconception that commercial comes in front of safety. This will work great until it doesn't, at which point we will have one of those accidents people discuss years later in every CRM course across the industry.
And what would you have done differently?
punkalouver is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2014, 23:00
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Here
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm amazed the guy has lasted this long, after years of testing the respective fleet offices.
crwkunt roll is offline  
Old 14th Jun 2014, 23:01
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Here
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
He would have probably landed at the nearest suitable airport????
crwkunt roll is offline  
Old 17th Jun 2014, 06:18
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: nowhere
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Discovered today that it was a 747 freighter three point turn. Or maybe it was a 777.

Last edited by JammedStab; 29th Sep 2014 at 02:00.
JammedStab is offline  
Old 17th Jun 2014, 07:29
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Above the Gay Bar
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm not familiar with the Boeing AutoBrake system, but doesn't each AB setting give a constant deceleration independent of reverse selection (reverse, in 'normal' ops will just affect the brake temperature?).
luvmuhud is offline  
Old 17th Jun 2014, 07:38
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Here ---> X
Posts: 438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
but doesn't each AB setting give a constant deceleration independent of reverse selection (reverse, in 'normal' ops will just affect the brake temperature?).
Yup.

...

The message you have entered is too short. Please lengthen your message to at least 10 characters.

Ok PPrune. There. Happy now?
Yonosoy Marinero is offline  
Old 17th Jun 2014, 10:32
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Not in a Bus
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Discovered today that it was a 747 freighter three point turn.
WRONG - 777
White None is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.