Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Fragrant Harbour
Reload this Page >

Not your Problem?

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Fragrant Harbour A forum for the large number of pilots (expats and locals) based with the various airlines in Hong Kong. Air Traffic Controllers are also warmly welcomed into the forum.

Not your Problem?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5th May 2002 | 14:07
  #21 (permalink)  
Moderate, Modest & Mild.
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 3,025
Likes: 1
From: The Global village
Lightbulb

With the current oversupply of airline-experienced pilots available, Cathay "management" are probably feeling that the hundreds of millions of dollars they've allowed to be lost so far, instead of simply sitting down and talking WITH their pilots, might end up as an investment. Ansett, Australian, East-West, IPEC, Ansett New Zealand, Eastern, and Continental also conducted campaigns against their pilots using a similar mindset. ALL of those airlines are now defunct!

If CX "management" were to consider replacing some/most/all of their current pilots with new recruits - and certainly it IS possible - do they seriously believe that the SAME problems are not going to recur within a very short period of time?

It is possible, Wiz, that the HKAOA decided not to institute an upgrade ban to prevent CX management (in the short-medium term) from employing direct entry captains.

IMHO, the longer I see this Dispute continuing, the shorter I see CX's future!
Kaptin M is offline  
Old 5th May 2002 | 15:40
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,835
Likes: 85
From: Boldly going where no split infinitive has gone before..
Hi Kaptin,

In the most part I agree with you (though I don't agree that the dispute was the root cause of the demise of the Australian operators listed. Don't want a great debate about it here, lets agree to differ!!), but what is the solution?

You may be right about the ban (Thought the only Cathay pilot who has had the decency to address it here has in essence said "It's to big a sacrifice to not take an upgrade, so we'll just let others stay unemployed to further our aims"), but what's the difference between banning direct entry captains and banning direct entry SOs and FOs?

As you know, the '89 dispute proved that an airline will ALWAYS find enough recruits. Hard as the AFAP fought the dispute, it didn't get you your job back. As I have said, the problem with this policy is it won't work.

And if the end result is that Cathay DOES go down, well, I've been there (quite recently!) and in that case EVERYONE loses!
Wizofoz is offline  
Old 5th May 2002 | 19:24
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 3
From: Arizona USA
Just noticed a CONTINENTAL jet passing overhead five minutes ago.....don't think THEY are...."gone"!!
Hello....wrong number??
411A is offline  
Old 6th May 2002 | 00:30
  #24 (permalink)  
Moderate, Modest & Mild.
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 3,025
Likes: 1
From: The Global village
Red face

Yes, I was waiting for someone to pick up on Continental and of course it just HAD to be our resident Indonesian airline director and magnate, 411A Perhaps 411, when you have a minute to spare from the obviously onerous and demanding chores involved in getting your museum of aircraft airborne, you might like to publish here the number of Chapter 11's that Continental went through.
Before long, Australia will see Australian Airlines also (re)commence operations under the same owners - but it's not the same company that was conveniently incorporated into QANTAS for massive debt re-structuring following the prolonged dispute with its pilot workforce.

On a lighter note, "G'day Wiz!". The obvious solution is for Cathay management to REALISE that their pilots do have some GENUINE concerns, about which they feel strongly enough aggrieved to continue their industrial action in an attempt to bring the employer to talks.
I believe the term "responsible and accountable management" is the common factor that was MISSING from the list previously mentioned.
Kaptin M is offline  
Old 6th May 2002 | 00:39
  #25 (permalink)  
Moderate, Modest & Mild.
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 3,025
Likes: 1
From: The Global village
Cool

Frankg, wrt the article you posted titled "Pilots for oneworld Alliance Airlines Call for Improved Industrial Relations and Working Conditions", please email me at [email protected] for further discussion. Cheers.
Kaptin M is offline  
Old 6th May 2002 | 00:52
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,835
Likes: 85
From: Boldly going where no split infinitive has gone before..
Yo Kap,

NOW we are totally talking the same language.

Yes, Cathay mamagement waking up and smelling the S@@@ is what is desperatley required.

That makes the fact that the ban isn't going to work all the more critical. Would you agree that Cathay managment probably sees this as a golden opertunity to divide and concour by getting itself compliant, non unioun pilots?
Wizofoz is offline  
Old 6th May 2002 | 05:41
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 3
From: Arizona USA
Absolutely Wiz.....non-union pilots, the way to go !! More for the management and stockholders that way...
411A is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.