Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Fragrant Harbour
Reload this Page >

Relevant to Paris base closure?

Wikiposts
Search
Fragrant Harbour A forum for the large number of pilots (expats and locals) based with the various airlines in Hong Kong. Air Traffic Controllers are also warmly welcomed into the forum.

Relevant to Paris base closure?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15th Jun 2013, 02:26
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Polar Route
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm pretty sure the UN has less enforcement clout than the nations involved. I'm just saying...
cxorcist is offline  
Old 15th Jun 2013, 06:59
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: nowhere
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dear Junior Whopper

I don't know what tax CX crews in those countries are paying, I do know that in Australia, Canada and I'm pretty sure in the UK that CX crews are paying resident tax based on their CX income, with credit given for whatever HK tax is payed. If you paid any attention in the past on this you would know about the complaints on this from CX crew.

As an aside, as cxorcist has stated WTF does the UN have to do with it. In addition, some advice, don't give up your day job to be a lawyer! Your second last para is sort of wacky, you mean the tax offices don't understand their own laws and whatever international obligations their govs have signed up to?

By the way, I hope you have an assistant to blame your response onto as you sort of shot yourself in the foot when there are CX crew having to pay tax in their based countries.

This is a bit of arse sucking after the above, you see I'm having a sort of disagreement with my country's tax office and you may have opened a door for me. If my gov has signed off completely on this UN convention it may be enforceable and therefor I'm not liable to pay tax on my earnings from HK. Big Mach can you state the full title etc of this convention?

Last edited by ANCPER; 15th Jun 2013 at 07:23.
ANCPER is offline  
Old 16th Jun 2013, 10:05
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: nowhere
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Re: UN

What the UN says means jack**** depending!! Which is why I'm interested in whether Australia has signed up to that convention. Reason being is that back in the 80's (this is all a long distant memory) the Hawke/Keating gov signed up to some UN environmental treaty, then decided to ignore it regards any domestic issues that conflicted with said treaty, a number of environmental groups didn't like this and took the gov to court, I believe it went all the way to the high court with the result that it was legally binding on the gov as if domestic law. My memory I add once more!

Re the convention I'd point out the section that starts "Contracting States MAY agree etc. etc. and as you pointed out some countries don't have any tax agreement with HK. According to the advice from a tax lawyer I consulted recently, the ATO considers HK to be not much better than the Cook Islands!! That's his opinion of the ATO's view of course.

What I would add is that the UN doesn't make law as countries are sovereign states, countries may chose to ratify treaties/conventions etc and how that impacts domestically I guess depends on that country's laws.

Last edited by ANCPER; 16th Jun 2013 at 10:34.
ANCPER is offline  
Old 16th Jun 2013, 17:07
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Polar Route
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The UN is a joke that ought to be disbanded for being a total waste of time and space. Just about every country in the world with even the smallest set of cajones is willing to thumb their nose at the UN. As if the planet needs another governing body, aren't our respective national governments bad enough? Why add another layer of BS to the outragiously overpriced layers of bureaucracy already in place? I don't want to pay for that crap. More big government is not the answer, obviously!
cxorcist is offline  
Old 16th Jun 2013, 22:02
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Polar Route
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rod,

I like a lot of your posts, but on this topic - I totally disagree.

Who is it with great intentions and objectives?
cxorcist is offline  
Old 17th Jun 2013, 03:55
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Polar Route
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Great, but I'd rather have that portion of my taxes in my pocket.
cxorcist is offline  
Old 17th Jun 2013, 08:53
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Nirvana
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
UN

Is this the same organisation that's debating whether to have blasphemy laws recommended for all signatory countries?
Bob Hawke is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.