Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Fragrant Harbour A forum for the large number of pilots (expats and locals) based with the various airlines in Hong Kong. Air Traffic Controllers are also warmly welcomed into the forum.

Cancel speed

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7th April 2013 | 14:08
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 740
Likes: 0
From: Over There
If the performance engineers have worked out that 220kts is the maximum speed you can fly without blowing out the turn and getting too close to the rocks, how can ATC take responsibility for the terrain separation? what criteria do they use and how is it different to what the performance guys calculate? Does ATC do any calculations at all? Genuine questions, I dont know what the answer is.
Because THAT calculation is based on the minimum rate of climb required for terrain clearance criteria. Obviously most aircraft climb at greater than minimum rate of climb and once high enough, the speed is irrelevant. As an extreme example, if you were 7000' 3 miles from PORPA do you think it would matter then?

Cancel speed restriction is clearance to cancel ALL speed restrictions issued by ATC which includes any speeds on charts. It does not cancel speed restrictions imposed by your Company SOP's. (250kts to MSA)

Last edited by cpdude; 7th April 2013 at 14:09.
cpdude is offline  
Reply
Old 13th April 2013 | 08:43
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
From: Brisbane
Cancels ALL ATC speed restrictions. Balls to the wall, but, Company limits still apply of course. i.e. 250k until above MSA.
BalusKaptan is offline  
Reply
Old 14th April 2013 | 10:58
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
From: HK- A little bit of industrial China in every breath you take.
Agreed CP Dude, of course it matters not if you accelerate when above radar lower safe or MSA, of course you cant hit anything if you blow out the turn. Agree entirely, but my question was what calcs do ATC do to clear the requirement? What do the departure controllers implement to clear us when there is an obstacle defined restriction? Is it simply a matter of observing our current ROC?
Lowkoon is offline  
Reply
Old 14th April 2013 | 11:09
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
From: Not in a Bus
i.e. 250k until above MSA.
Correct for Light Twins; however, don't forget that in a big grown up aeroplane you can goto Vref +100 below MSA which could be 280kts+
White None is offline  
Reply
Old 17th April 2013 | 12:50
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 740
Likes: 0
From: Over There
Lowkoon,

Departures paths use criteria based on minimum values to determine terrain clearance. These are based on the minimum rate of climb required as is stated as "standard" with either PANOPS or TERPS etc. My memory fails me but I believe it's about 200'/nm on departure. Any departure which requires a higher ROC will have the minimum ROC required posted on the departure sheet.

Based on the minimum ROC the turn at PORPA allows for only a turn radius associated with a speed of 220kts. Not being an ATC type, I'm not sure what formulas are programmed into their computers but I'm sure they can automatically calculate your current altitude, ROC and speed and make the calculation seamlessly and automatically for the controller to then clear you unrestricted or high speed.

White None,

You are correct once cleared for high speed.

Last edited by cpdude; 17th April 2013 at 12:53.
cpdude is offline  
Reply
Old 17th April 2013 | 15:06
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
From: Here
Who knows if they even need a formula....? When you're cleared for high speed before Porpa, you're normally ALREADY above the highest piece of rock on your departure track before they give it.
crwkunt roll is offline  
Reply
Old 17th April 2013 | 23:01
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
From: Hong Kong
however, don't forget that in a big grown up aeroplane you can goto Vref +100 below MSA which could be 280kts+
On the 'bus it's the greater of 250kts or green dot speed. On a heavy 340, GD can be up towards 280kts. Does that mean that the A340 is a big grown up aeroplane too?

STP
Steve the Pirate is offline  
Reply
Old 18th April 2013 | 02:57
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 0
Likes: 1
From: Polar Route
STP,

No. The evidence is hanging on the wings.
cxorcist is offline  
Reply
Old 18th April 2013 | 03:05
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
If you were really big and grown up, you wouldn't need to ask ATC to go faster than 250kts!
treboryelk is offline  
Reply
Old 19th April 2013 | 09:30
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
From: Not in a Bus
STP

Sorry, according to the rules
towards 280kts
doesn't qualify. It HAS to be 280+. Love to help but..... Cannot, (Not that I'm displaying the raging inferiority complex all Jumbo drivers will vehemently deny now that the BigBus is around).

Last edited by White None; 19th April 2013 at 09:32.
White None is offline  
Reply
Old 19th April 2013 | 11:02
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,424
Likes: 0
From: Smogsville
While at the hold it's nice to look down into the cockpit of the Bigbus next to you.
SMOC is offline  
Reply
Old 19th April 2013 | 13:07
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
You can look down on me from your freighter any time you like with that 'I'm flying rubber dog!!!! out of Hong Kong' smirk.
treboryelk is offline  
Reply
Old 20th April 2013 | 01:31
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
From: Not in a Bus
I Love Rubber Dog!!!!. It doesn't get lost/pissed in the terminal, it doesn't pinch my bum. It doesn't bleat if we're late or require apologies for stuff out of my control. It doesn't say "Cannot". It doesn't expect me to buy it, and it's mate's dinner and it always respects me in the morning.
White None is offline  
Reply
Old 21st April 2013 | 20:18
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
From: Not in a Bus
Sshhh....
White None is offline  
Reply
Old 22nd April 2013 | 02:07
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
So is flying the freighter that good? Maybe the pay and rosters are not as bad as some make out!
treboryelk is offline  
Reply
Old 22nd April 2013 | 04:51
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Treboryelk

You are Nick Rhodes and I claim my £5. ;-p
Liam Gallagher is offline  
Reply
Old 22nd April 2013 | 05:35
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
From: Not in a Bus
Trevor the Moose

Amazing that so many in the company STILL!! don't know that most of us fly both, on the same pay. Having the seniority to do so I now get to pick either and where poss, fly freight. Why?.... See above.

Last edited by White None; 22nd April 2013 at 05:39.
White None is offline  
Reply
Old 22nd April 2013 | 07:30
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
Good stuff....though sounds like you wont be in a hurry to fly the -8i if Cathay buys them?
treboryelk is offline  
Reply
Old 22nd April 2013 | 08:59
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
From: Here
Love the thread creep.
crwkunt roll is offline  
Reply
Old 22nd April 2013 | 12:06
  #40 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 91
Likes: 10
From: at home
Ok,

Now that this thread has gone "Off Topic" with the usual "im better than you" BS.

I have another ATC question.

The requirements at FL130 inbound to HKG, if ATC clear you below can we disregard the restriction?

If not, often they descend us to an altitude, do we have to maintain STD until passing the waypoint, ie pass at FL130 ISO 13000 on QNH (on our charts the restriction is FL130)

I would be interested in hearing from the ATCer's on this one.

JY
JY9024 is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.