Wikiposts
Search
Fragrant Harbour A forum for the large number of pilots (expats and locals) based with the various airlines in Hong Kong. Air Traffic Controllers are also warmly welcomed into the forum.

SCMP

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th Aug 2012, 15:46
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Out there
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
SCMP

Hong Kong News Headlines | Hong Kong's premier newspaper online | SCMP.com
Baywatcher is offline  
Old 12th Aug 2012, 17:16
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Polar Route
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Will NR be held accountable? Or is being Director of Cargo punishment enough? Or will the blame be passed to the poor MBC long gone and out of her league when it came to establishing employment companies overseas?

Willful ignorance is the same as outright lying and cheating! CX should be fined for all back taxes plus interest and punitive penalties. I've never experienced an organization this large and successful with such disregard for the rules of law in the countries to which they operate. It makes me fear for our future...
cxorcist is offline  
Old 12th Aug 2012, 17:53
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: HKG
Posts: 1,410
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Can someone post the article please.
BusyB is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2012, 02:49
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Out of the pollution.
Posts: 673
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They could certainly 'Base' everyone in HK,
and allow you to be rostered out of a preferred
port.
Taxes in addition to Hk would be up to individual based on port/ circumstance
AAIGUY is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2012, 03:44
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: HK
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Actually...they can't even do that now. Reason, all the relevant tax authorities know about Cathay. Closing a base and preferred port rostering would still leave officers exposed to double taxation...and/or punitive action.

Is this article not a little "out of date?"

Yes, we knew about officers facing a double hit, yes we knew about Paris closing, and the potential of other base closures... so what's new in this article ???
Walk-Around Bitch is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2012, 03:55
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Personal tax is a personal matter for the affected individual......."

So why do they withhold you're final pay and provident fund until you have provided them with a letter from HKIRD stating that you have paid up all your taxes owing, when you retire?
Bye Bye Baby is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2012, 04:01
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: H.K.
Age: 51
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CX, until you take accountability for the crime that was the 49'ers, bad karma will follow you. This is a direct result of a court case initiated by an employee that was wrongfully dismissed because you thought you are above the law CX.
CXtreme is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2012, 06:17
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Out of the pollution.
Posts: 673
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Walk-Around,
Respectfully, you're expecting CX to take on the tax burden of the individuals choice in my example. I am not.

I am suggesting, you may own a house in Bangkok/ KUL, where you have the right to live due to ownership, and have that as a preffered port. Pay your tax in HK, live elsewhere. Everyone's home tax laws are different, I don't expect SWIRE to know or really care about them.

However, If I want to live in X, and why shouldn't I be able to if I deal with the taxes on my own?

Personally, I float between 2 countries in addition to Hong kong, careful not to incur tax outside HK. It works fine.
AAIGUY is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2012, 07:07
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Brexitland
Posts: 1,146
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Basically, CX should do things properly like a grown up Company and stop behaving like a Mill Owner. Basing pilots abroad would obviously incur some employer responsibility in the jurisdiction. Why didn't the brilliant Oxbridge lot realise that and do it legally, or at least cleverly. Instead, we have the Revenue plodders beavering away and eventually catching our great, tax evading leaders out so that they have to invent a story, close Bases and lick their wounds whilst hoping not to incur massive fines!!
Seriously, expect Frankfurt to close at the very least. Maybe London which would be fun..................
You couldn't make it up.
Arfur Dent is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2012, 07:55
  #10 (permalink)  
711
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Up in the air
Age: 58
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I will never forget what they did to me. One day, sooner or later, it will be payback time.
711 is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2012, 09:30
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: UK.
Posts: 4,390
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Closing a base and preferred port rostering would still leave officers exposed to double taxation...
Not in the UK. If you are liable for HK AND UK tax then then HMRC will offset the HK tax paid and reduce their demand accordingly.
Basil is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2012, 09:33
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Cathay City
Age: 65
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I will never forget what they did to me.
None of us will. Company / Employee relations are rotten to the core, and will forever remain so because of that act of pure evil.
whackthemole is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2012, 10:59
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: HKG
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Isn't the watch advertisement on that SCMP page where this article is ironic?
I quote " to break the rules you must first master them"
yokebearer is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2012, 16:10
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: U.K.
Age: 75
Posts: 213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Rules

Yokebearer, Thank you for bringing the watch advertisement to my attention. I had good laugh. I am sure that the irony will be lost on some!

I too will never forget, or forgive, what the morally bankrupt SOBs did to 42 flight engineers.

We know who was responsible, don't we, GC, KB, GM and RE?

Happy to be gone!
FERetd is offline  
Old 13th Aug 2012, 23:54
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: a few track miles south of BEKOL
Age: 57
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i believe that article was put together based on several threads here in fragrant harbour. there is no source mentioned and all the issues discussed have been discussed here. now the article comes back to these pages. circuit complete!
bigjames is offline  
Old 14th Aug 2012, 00:07
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: with the other ex-CX pond scum (a zoologist was once head of Flight Ops)
Posts: 1,855
Received 51 Likes on 22 Posts
It may be old news to us, but it is interesting that the result of a 'perfect storm' of arrogance and incompetence is now making the press.

And like the residual background radiation in the cosmos of the 'big bang', reverberations from their dismissal of the 49ers are still detectable many years after the event.

Last edited by Captain Dart; 14th Aug 2012 at 00:26.
Captain Dart is online now  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.