14 more orders for Cx

Subscribe
9th March 2011 | 10:08
  #1 (permalink)  
I wonder if these will be 14 A380's to replace our ageing 744. Why else did we get such a deep discount on our A330.
Reply 0
9th March 2011 | 10:13
  #2 (permalink)  
I wonder why we are buying a 748 simulator for 10 aircraft?
Reply 0
9th March 2011 | 10:37
  #3 (permalink)  
the -8 sim will make more money than the aircraft will...
Reply 0
9th March 2011 | 22:33
  #4 (permalink)  
I believe that the new sim will be interchangeable. 400 or -8 and will also be able to switch engine configurations. Oh joy how much fun will a PC be!!

I also think it is replacing one of the clapped out sims, so will still have plenty of work, at least until the 21 pax -400s are retired.
Reply 0
10th March 2011 | 08:01
  #5 (permalink)  
Sorry McDude, but that is just an ignorant statement.

I am pretty sure CX will make huge money with a 747-8F that carries 16% more volume and weight than the -400 and burns the same amount of fuel doing it. Perhaps the 777F would have been a better purchase, but I am quite certain renting out sim time is a less profitable business than lifting cargo out of Hong Kong.

My guess is the 14 aircraft still in negotiations are six 777F and eight 748I or A380. I understand Qantas is looking to turn away 8 of their remaining 11 A380 deliveries. So maybe CX gets a deal on those???
Reply 0
10th March 2011 | 18:53
  #6 (permalink)  
I read in the press (yeah, take it with a grain of salt) that these 14 orders will NOT be for A380s nor 747-8Is
Reply 0
11th March 2011 | 04:02
  #7 (permalink)  
cxorcist,

that's the first I've heard that QF may want to release some of their 380 orders. Apart from the RR engine thing, I thought they were pretty happy with the 380.
Reply 0
11th March 2011 | 05:11
  #8 (permalink)  
Longreach,

By the sound of your name, you would know better than me. I was just passing along a rumor I heard from an Ozzie I flew with recently. He said QF likes them for the kangaroo route, but not so much for the Pacific.

Cxorcist
Reply 0