Potential cargo capacity problems
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Sector C
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Potential cargo capacity problems
Potentially CX will be up with a capacity problem with the freighter fleet.
The current strategy somewhat relies on the 747-8F to replace the 747-BCF capacity being transferred to the Air China/Cathay joint venture.
Boeing is set to soon to formally announce a large delay on the 747-8F due to "near cruise speed structural flutter in the flight test program", see Additonal Delays Cripple Boeing?s Strategy and Finances
It has been suggested that changing the placement of the inboard engines maybe the only engineering solution available to remedy this flutter issue.
This will put CX is an very difficult position, with more and more freight being sold, we may see a case of other airlines (including the new Air China/Cathay joint venture) flying freight for CX, as CX does not have the aircraft.
This will again put pressure on the pilot group, scope clauses will be challenged, and no doubt interesting time will be ahead for those who are contractually "freighter only”.
As an interesting sideline from this related article 747-8 delay illustrative of program problems
"The Lufthansa order is understood to have a relationship to Boeing cancellation years ago of its in-flight Internet Connexion service for which Lufthansa was a launch customer and the KAL order is tied up in compensation for late deliveries of the 787 and 747-8F."
The current strategy somewhat relies on the 747-8F to replace the 747-BCF capacity being transferred to the Air China/Cathay joint venture.
Boeing is set to soon to formally announce a large delay on the 747-8F due to "near cruise speed structural flutter in the flight test program", see Additonal Delays Cripple Boeing?s Strategy and Finances
It has been suggested that changing the placement of the inboard engines maybe the only engineering solution available to remedy this flutter issue.
This will put CX is an very difficult position, with more and more freight being sold, we may see a case of other airlines (including the new Air China/Cathay joint venture) flying freight for CX, as CX does not have the aircraft.
This will again put pressure on the pilot group, scope clauses will be challenged, and no doubt interesting time will be ahead for those who are contractually "freighter only”.
As an interesting sideline from this related article 747-8 delay illustrative of program problems
"The Lufthansa order is understood to have a relationship to Boeing cancellation years ago of its in-flight Internet Connexion service for which Lufthansa was a launch customer and the KAL order is tied up in compensation for late deliveries of the 787 and 747-8F."
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Up in the air
Age: 58
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
To all those poor early freighter commanders who can't get used to actually working now after 2 years on 40 block hours:
GET BACK IN LINE AS F/O IF YOU DON'T LIKE IT.
(or enjoy DEL,MUM and ANC in the meantime
).
GET BACK IN LINE AS F/O IF YOU DON'T LIKE IT.
(or enjoy DEL,MUM and ANC in the meantime
).
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Berchtesgaden
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
711
i am not complaining about india, it has it's pro's and con's.
i know that I rather have a yoga experience in bom (make a note of that) than spending a few hours to the left of you.
i know that I rather have a yoga experience in bom (make a note of that) than spending a few hours to the left of you.
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: planet 10 by way of the 8th dimension
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And I thought if was the pax FOs who were jumping ship to the 777 fleet because they didn't enjoy the long freighter patterns. Dude, we're used to it. Even our 40 hours block months entailed 12-day patterns in HKG sitting on reserve.
This sour grapes stuff has to really stop. If you didn't go for a command on the freighter that was your choice. Why should you be upset at someone who did? If I recall, I didn't see anyone protesting about wanting to come to the Classic. Hats off to the few guys who did. 711, please feel free to explain here so I don't have to hear about it over Yangon.
By the way, we will be staying in DEL, BOM, ANC and DXB with an FO, so if you're an FO on the 744---get used to it.
PS, please also explain what your comment has to do with this thread?
This sour grapes stuff has to really stop. If you didn't go for a command on the freighter that was your choice. Why should you be upset at someone who did? If I recall, I didn't see anyone protesting about wanting to come to the Classic. Hats off to the few guys who did. 711, please feel free to explain here so I don't have to hear about it over Yangon.
By the way, we will be staying in DEL, BOM, ANC and DXB with an FO, so if you're an FO on the 744---get used to it.
PS, please also explain what your comment has to do with this thread?
Join Date: May 2004
Location: 3.5 from TD
Age: 47
Posts: 1,042
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Great article Eyes, should be required reading for our short-sighted leaders. It is so sad to see a company like Boeing, which has always been regarded the leading commercial aircraft manufacturer, turned into a second-rate accountant managed fiasco.
When will people learn? You can't let accountants run your business. Costs are not always the priority and a smaller profit with healthier business practices is more important than a huge profit at the expense of destroying your business' foundation.
So sad to see most aviation related industry heading in the same direction...
When will people learn? You can't let accountants run your business. Costs are not always the priority and a smaller profit with healthier business practices is more important than a huge profit at the expense of destroying your business' foundation.
So sad to see most aviation related industry heading in the same direction...
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 672
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If they are that desperate for freight capacity then it should be easy to take the JAL freighters. I am sure there is a compensation clause in the contract with Boeing over the 748F; enough to pay for wet-leases anyway...not that it helps the command situation.
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Up in the air
Age: 58
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Buckaroo,
I have absolutely no problem with early freighter commanders, the company offered the option to everybody, fair enough.
However, it was pretty clear what to expect, what kind of lifestyle, rosters etc.
I have absolutely no sympathy for some of them , who suddenly start a "discussion" about combined pax/freighter flying. This is a ruthless,despicable and selfish attempt to jump the line, absolutely unacceptable.
I have absolutely no problem with early freighter commanders, the company offered the option to everybody, fair enough.
However, it was pretty clear what to expect, what kind of lifestyle, rosters etc.
I have absolutely no sympathy for some of them , who suddenly start a "discussion" about combined pax/freighter flying. This is a ruthless,despicable and selfish attempt to jump the line, absolutely unacceptable.
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: planet 10 by way of the 8th dimension
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
711
Fair enough. When these guys "discuss" combined pax/freighter flying (and pay) it merely wishful thinking. As far as being a "ruthless,despicable and selfish attempt to jump the line", well I'd say that if the company decides to offer that it would be due to need/demand. That being said, since freighter captains are by definition already captains, they are not taking any of your slots away.
Again, I sense perhaps a bit of sour grapes. Example: FO "A" signs a contract on B scale (or UFO scale) and therefore has a set pay scale for his career plannning. During "A"'s progression he has the chance to apply for a frtr command but chooses to remain flying pax. FO "B" does apply, passes the course and is also aware of his pay scale for the remainder of his career. Suddenly, the market changes and the company decides to "upgrade" the frtr cpts to B scale. Why would FO "A" be upset? Because it's not fair? Well, his contract wasn't diminished in any way.
Simplified version: A construction site puts up a sign offering work for 10 men starting at 0800 the following morning. The next morning 50 guys show up and the foreman selects 10 and offers them 100 dollars to work until 1700. They accept. At 1100 the foreman realizes that he needs 5 more men to complete the job. If he doesn't complete the job his company will have to pay a hefty late penalty. So he then goes out in the street and starts searching for workers. It's difficult because the other 40 men have since left looking for work elsewhere. The foreman finally finds 5 guys and offers them 100 dollars to work until 1700. They accept. Should the first 10 guys be upset because they have to work 3 hours more to gain the same 100 dollars? That's what they signed up for.
See my point?
Fair enough. When these guys "discuss" combined pax/freighter flying (and pay) it merely wishful thinking. As far as being a "ruthless,despicable and selfish attempt to jump the line", well I'd say that if the company decides to offer that it would be due to need/demand. That being said, since freighter captains are by definition already captains, they are not taking any of your slots away.
Again, I sense perhaps a bit of sour grapes. Example: FO "A" signs a contract on B scale (or UFO scale) and therefore has a set pay scale for his career plannning. During "A"'s progression he has the chance to apply for a frtr command but chooses to remain flying pax. FO "B" does apply, passes the course and is also aware of his pay scale for the remainder of his career. Suddenly, the market changes and the company decides to "upgrade" the frtr cpts to B scale. Why would FO "A" be upset? Because it's not fair? Well, his contract wasn't diminished in any way.
Simplified version: A construction site puts up a sign offering work for 10 men starting at 0800 the following morning. The next morning 50 guys show up and the foreman selects 10 and offers them 100 dollars to work until 1700. They accept. At 1100 the foreman realizes that he needs 5 more men to complete the job. If he doesn't complete the job his company will have to pay a hefty late penalty. So he then goes out in the street and starts searching for workers. It's difficult because the other 40 men have since left looking for work elsewhere. The foreman finally finds 5 guys and offers them 100 dollars to work until 1700. They accept. Should the first 10 guys be upset because they have to work 3 hours more to gain the same 100 dollars? That's what they signed up for.
See my point?
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: planet 10 by way of the 8th dimension
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
T.M.
Please explain: "who accepted the crap conditions and helped drag it down for all of us."
1. what were the "crap conditions"? Kept base and improved pay.
2. How did frtr cpts "drag" anything down for you? Did your contract suddenly change?
Enlighten me.
Please explain: "who accepted the crap conditions and helped drag it down for all of us."
1. what were the "crap conditions"? Kept base and improved pay.
2. How did frtr cpts "drag" anything down for you? Did your contract suddenly change?
Enlighten me.
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: now a paxdoggiedog too...
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Pot this is kettle... come in, pot
I do have a problem with early freighter commanders who accepted the crap conditions and helped drag it down for all of us.
United we stand, divided we fall, and by God pilots just love to divide themselves like small bickering children... while management chuckle all the way to the bank.
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Europe
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
T.M.
Please explain: "who accepted the crap conditions and helped drag it down for all of us."
1. what were the "crap conditions"? Kept base and improved pay.
2. How did frtr cpts "drag" anything down for you? Did your contract suddenly change?
Enlighten me.
Please explain: "who accepted the crap conditions and helped drag it down for all of us."
1. what were the "crap conditions"? Kept base and improved pay.
2. How did frtr cpts "drag" anything down for you? Did your contract suddenly change?
Enlighten me.
Let me break the seniority list like this, prior freighter command offered:
A-TOP 100: b-scale capt.
B-MID 100: b-scale F/O
C-LAST 100: b-scale F/O
Now we have:
A: 100 B-scale capt. flying pax and freighter
most of B and some C: 100 b-scale F/O's
most of C and some B: 100 Freight-scale capt. flying 100% freighter for 30% less money than A
We could have had:
A and B: 200 B-scale capt. on 100% the money
C: 100 B-scale F/O
The ones taking a freighter command have effectively dragged the conditions down for the rest of the F/O's senior to them.
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: now a paxdoggiedog too...
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Pot, be advised I read you one...
So Messiah and Fly123456, you must both be
- A-scalers, or else
- not know the meaning of the word "hypocrite", and/or
- have a bad case of sour grapes?
- A-scalers, or else
- not know the meaning of the word "hypocrite", and/or
- have a bad case of sour grapes?
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: now a paxdoggiedog too...
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not quite
They accepted the position for MORE money than they had been making previously (as F-scale or even based B-scale FOs), not to mention the advantage of starting on CN payscale increment 1 far earlier; a no-brainer really, if they wanted to stay on a base and didn't plan to take advantage of HKG housing.
Much as you presumably accepted a B-scale (or F-scale if you joined as a DEFO) because it was better than whatever you had previously, even if this way you were (from the point of view of your A-scale predecessors) accepting "crap conditions and helped drag it down for all of us".
The point is that the company has successfully played this game for years: the senior guys on "superior" conditions let it happen due to I'm-all-right-Jackitis, then when a few years later they find themselves in a minority they take it out on their junior colleagues for accepting "crap conditions and helping drag it down for all of us", instead of realizing that they have been outfoxed by management again.
Newsflash: it's happening again with housing. So, are we going to sit here and throw cr@p at each other or are we going to try and stop lower conditions being offered to junior crew this time?
Like you say, it's not rocket science, but I'm not holding my breath.
Much as you presumably accepted a B-scale (or F-scale if you joined as a DEFO) because it was better than whatever you had previously, even if this way you were (from the point of view of your A-scale predecessors) accepting "crap conditions and helped drag it down for all of us".
The point is that the company has successfully played this game for years: the senior guys on "superior" conditions let it happen due to I'm-all-right-Jackitis, then when a few years later they find themselves in a minority they take it out on their junior colleagues for accepting "crap conditions and helping drag it down for all of us", instead of realizing that they have been outfoxed by management again.
Newsflash: it's happening again with housing. So, are we going to sit here and throw cr@p at each other or are we going to try and stop lower conditions being offered to junior crew this time?
Like you say, it's not rocket science, but I'm not holding my breath.