Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Fragrant Harbour
Reload this Page >

Judgement in the 49ers case: 11/11/09

Wikiposts
Search
Fragrant Harbour A forum for the large number of pilots (expats and locals) based with the various airlines in Hong Kong. Air Traffic Controllers are also warmly welcomed into the forum.

Judgement in the 49ers case: 11/11/09

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 13th Nov 2009, 14:38
  #81 (permalink)  

Cool as a moosp
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Mostly Hong Kong
Posts: 802
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I found it appalling to note that Mr Tyler had no mention in his weekly message to staff about the High court ruling. As he was named in the case, one would have thought he might at least have given his CCD'd filtered opinion. This was left to CCD (through which the DFO did his appropriate service on his management advancement, we should not forget) to give a humbled aggressive response, like a rottweiler being bested by a terrier.

The days of "Noble House" are over. If you wish to do business in the world, you shall do business by the world's standards, and that includes you, Mr. Catbert. (Cf Dilbert for those not acquainted)

That individual rostering clerks who have raised their poppy head above the rest to become ersatz managers should be so castigated by the Learned Judge is particularly illuminating. Perhaps he will do the decent thing. I have lived within the corporate world of Asia long enough to doubt that he will. I hope that his scheduling staff will make him realise that he has made them all look fools, and apply the appropriate methods of Hong Kong.

I honestly doubt that some of the senior management in CX could run a department in the normal business world outside of Hong Kong, where adherence to labour laws is part of the cost of doing business.

Let us all celebrate this High court decision, irrespective of our differences as to whether we took the CX option, resigned from the AOA in disgust, or supported the breakaway union. The workers of Hong Kong have seen a light in this ruling, that the days of colonial arrogance in the employment of staff may just be about to turn.
moosp is offline  
Old 13th Nov 2009, 23:27
  #82 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 601
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Link

Cider30

There's a link from WeakForce at the top of page 3 of this thread or you can go to the CPU website direct.

STP
Steve the Pirate is offline  
Old 13th Nov 2009, 23:34
  #83 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: hong kong
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Maybe the mocking and satirical Mr. Management would like to comment on his team’s performance.

Some of the pilots that “allegedly” decided the fate of the 49ers included a manager who was in command when he pushed back a 747 in TPE with a door still open and basically just about ripped the door off. Another Star departed PEN with gear pins in. Yet another Star impressed a airplane manufacturer so much with his CRM and people skills that they gave him a very derogatory nickname. Yet again at Boeing Field, a B777 on a delivery flight was flown recklessly close to the ground in an unauthorised fly by a Star Chamber member. The Crew Schedulers were represented by THE SHERMINATOR whose submission to the court was described as nothing more than name-calling and of no value to the court.
And this group of above-mentioned individuals decided the fate of some very professional pilots and destroyed many careers. After reading the 70-page report it would be a miracle if CX could turn that result around and they should probably just write the cheques out.
CYRILJGROOVE is offline  
Old 14th Nov 2009, 02:45
  #84 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Mostly in a hotel
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks Steve.

Cider30
Cider30 is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2009, 05:51
  #85 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 2,089
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Leehoma.


Thank's for the information and the answer I was looking for.
stilton is offline  
Old 15th Nov 2009, 22:18
  #86 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Asia
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I hope everyone is keeping Mr Sherman Lam informed as it appears " NOT CONTACTABLE WHEN NOT ON DUTY" is a reason for him to report on you.
I wonder who Mr Lam reports to when he is not at work.
leftof is offline  
Old 23rd Nov 2009, 18:42
  #87 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I believe that a few more lawsuits are heading CX's way, particularly as they pertain to reinstatement. I still find the irony of Ian Wilkinson being the root of managements demise comical. Why don't you just offer them all their jobs back, a handshake, a decent cheque and an apology. THAT would be drawing a line under the issue.
water check is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2009, 03:31
  #88 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I wouldn't be surprised if more lawsuits are in the pipeline. Now that there has been a high profile case where justice was seen to be done and big business, with their unbelievably deep pockets, did not manage to draw the case out forever. There is no longer the excuse to have the mindset that the little people can't get true justice when up against the 'biggies'. I commend the 49'ers and their perseverence.

Unfortunately, CX has drawn out so many issues for so long that more court cases are inevitable. Nothing real as far as addressing the many issues has come from CX for a very long time. Despite the DFO's last letter, I believe it is yet just further delaying tactics and nothing concrete will come our way as a result. Many of the future court cases and resulting costs and publicity are firmly in CX's hands. Sadly, I believe this will mean much bad publicity for our beloved airline(no sarcasm intended - it is still OUR airline). So much for a socially responsible company.
rick.shaw is offline  
Old 24th Nov 2009, 03:41
  #89 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: crewbag
Age: 51
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sadly, I believe this will mean much bad publicity for our beloved airline(no sarcasm intended - it is still OUR airline). So much for a socially responsible company.
What's sad is the need for the "no sarcasm intended" statement. Just goes to show the sad state of affairs within this airline. The employee/employer relationship has been systematically reduced to a contractual battle between a vendor and buyer, where there is no trust, no goodwill, no prisoners taken and no loyality.

It just makes you wonder whether it's a desired or unintended consequence of the management style.
quadspeed is offline  
Old 2nd Dec 2009, 14:29
  #90 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Yarra
Age: 54
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The employee/employer relationship has been systematically reduced to a contractual battle between a vendor and buyer, where there is no trust, no goodwill, no prisoners taken and no loyality.
And apparently no honesty either

"today a formal complaint of perjury was lodged with the Commissioner of Police in HK by an officer of the court against Messrs. Rhodes and Kroutil of Cathay Pacific Airways."
zygot44 is offline  
Old 2nd Dec 2009, 21:12
  #91 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
well if is true about NR and SK you ought to make that a subject title on its own and give it the prominence it deserves.
Glass Half Empty is offline  
Old 3rd Dec 2009, 10:17
  #92 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
zygot44 - dream or reality

The way you have written your post indicates a quote from a written source. Is there some substance to your so-called quote or is this a vision from a dream?

If the latter, tread carefully. Although being a rumour network, the 2 gentlemen to which you have referred have just learnt how to sucessfully prosecute a defamation case.
Liam Gallagher is offline  
Old 3rd Dec 2009, 11:18
  #93 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Britain
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the 2 gentlemen to which you have referred have just learnt how to sucessfully prosecute a defamation case.
Didn't they unsuccessfully defend a defamation case??
simplex is offline  
Old 3rd Dec 2009, 13:25
  #94 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Heard from a connected source that even though the company could appeal.....an appeal looks very unlikely or if undertaken would be potentially doomed to failure.

An appeal it appears will have a high degree of success if its on a contention of a point of law, but in the final judgement of this case this didnt figure, as it was a judges opinion.

But Cathay cant stand to lose.

Scoreboard
Scoreboard is offline  
Old 3rd Dec 2009, 22:14
  #95 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: hong kong
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What are the estimated legal costs that the company has to bear? Any ideas?
Might be more than the judgement?
4 driver is offline  
Old 4th Dec 2009, 01:58
  #96 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Alleged Perjury

As reported on this thread:

"today a formal complaint of perjury was lodged with the Commissioner of Police in HK by an officer of the court against Messrs. Rhodes and Kroutil of Cathay Pacific Airways."

I seem to recall Ken Barley and Ron Davies making similar "inaccurate" statements under oath in the UK hearings.

Memories are long, as is the arm of the law!
Four Holer Roller is offline  
Old 5th Dec 2009, 07:58
  #97 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What are the estimated legal costs that the company has to bear? Any ideas?
Might be more than the judgement?
You could ask the DFO because he would know. The problem as always ---- he won't tell the truth.
WeakForce is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2009, 11:21
  #98 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Yarra
Age: 54
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Word on the street is that his legal costs are about to increase alarmingly.
zygot44 is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2009, 15:23
  #99 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
18-20m HKG is what I heard......
jonathon68 is offline  
Old 21st Dec 2009, 17:47
  #100 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Despite what some may think, I believe that CX will back NR to the end - no matter what the cost. He has saved the company 100's of millions of dollars over the years with his delaying tactics and shabby treatment of those under him. This is in major part due to his (mis)managers backing him into a (legal) corner on many issues.

Sadly, all this legal wrangling has cost the company many millions more, in my opinion. But that doesn't matter, right? A compliant workforce in itself is worth a fortune. I've said it before, but what the heck, I'll say it again. The only way to get CX to the table and/or comply with our contracts is going to be through the courts. Their war chest(i.e. our profit share and 13th month) is huge - make no mistake. Be prepared for many more expensive, protracted and very public court cases. We'll get what's coming to us - just might take a while, that's all.

Interesting that he sees the HKAOA letters as being inflammatory. But the fact is they are merely spelling out the bitter-sweet truth about the current state of affairs.
rick.shaw is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.