Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Fragrant Harbour
Reload this Page >

SCMP - Flight did not require a third pilot, aviation body tells court

Wikiposts
Search
Fragrant Harbour A forum for the large number of pilots (expats and locals) based with the various airlines in Hong Kong. Air Traffic Controllers are also warmly welcomed into the forum.

SCMP - Flight did not require a third pilot, aviation body tells court

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 19th Jun 2009, 15:51
  #21 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So imagine turning up for work at midnight, finding out you have no required third crew member, and that CX has just got an approval to operate the flight. As the Captain, wouldn't you just refuse on the grounds of the stupidity of the Approval?? Or does the Dispensation negate the captain's judgement?
Considering he's 99% either based in HK or Australia ( they don't sensibly roster to normal body clocks), he probably didnt sleep for the whole day, and was shagged ( TIRED, FATIGUED ) anyway. In my Opinion, he should have just refused.

Last edited by Sleeve_of_Wizard; 20th Jun 2009 at 16:52. Reason: Deleting Aussie Slang!!!
Sleeve_of_Wizard is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2009, 18:09
  #22 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: HK
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Or does the Dispensation negate the captain's judgement?
In words of one syllable - NO!

Just because a circumstance is presented to you, that you are told is now legal because of "blah blah whatever...", there is still the onus on the skipper to ensure that the proposed course of action is also prudent.

I'm sure we all know, just because something is legal, doesn't necessarily make it sensible and prudent. Amongst other things, we are also paid to exercise good judgement, so that we can avoid, where possible, having to use our skills to dig ourselves out of holes later, that we wish we hadn't gotten ourselves into, either willingly or through coercion.

Standing up and defending your position is however another question.
Some do it without batting an eyelid, some others are more easily led.
Remember, our passengers pay to get there safely.
If they are on time, well thats just an added bonus.
mephisto88 is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2009, 19:55
  #23 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Arizona USA
Posts: 8,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Over 8 hours in the seat with no rest is way too much...
Keep on dreaming...

Considering he's 99% either based in HK or Australia ( they don't sensibly roster to normal body clocks), he probably didnt sleep for the whole day, and was shagged anyway. In my Opinion, he should have just refused.
Shagged anyway?
Does NOT belong at the pointy end, considering proper rest was originally scheduled.
HOTAC is designed for rest...not shagging until your eyes are crossed.
Contrary to popular opinion.

A wake up call is needed for such crew that think they can get away with just...any old ideas.
Shape up...or ship out.
I'm sure the airline won't care.
411A is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2009, 20:16
  #24 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you substitute the word 'fatigued' for 'Shagged' the previous post might make sense to you 411A, bit of Aussie slang going around.
kmagyoyo is offline  
Old 19th Jun 2009, 23:20
  #25 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Moved beyond
Posts: 1,189
Received 90 Likes on 51 Posts
A problem with FTLs is that they assume human beings are machines that can be switched OFF and ON as required during rostered rest periods. That's obviously not the case and I personally find it very difficult to get enough rest during the day before an overnight flight. Circadian rhythms make it difficult for many pilots to sleep properly during the day; at home there's the pressure of family life, while down route we have the problem of cheap, noisy crew hotels. Complaints to management don't get very far.

That said, I don't have a problem with the regulator granting temporary variations, provided suitable safeguards are in place (eg adequate notice to the crew, etc). I do find some of the provisions of the FTLs a bit ludicrous, however. An overnight flight with one sector from MEL-HKG requires 3 crew, but an overnight pattern with two sectors from HKG-DPS vv and a longer duty period doesn't. Which one is more fatiguing?
BuzzBox is online now  
Old 20th Jun 2009, 02:16
  #26 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hong K ong
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What if the CMD dies of natural causes during a flight

Picture this:

The F/O is HK based did not get a decent sleep for the last two nights and is completely stressed out. (Ie Divorce or what ever)

They have a technical problem in route (What ever) which stresses an elder CMD out, to the extent that he passes away as did a continental CMD recently.

Now you have a possibly low time experienced and completely fatigued / stressed out F/O in charge of a plane with a technical problem.

Lets hope he has plenty of fuel or the weather is gin clear in HK.

(Yes I know its silly example)

What I'm trying to say is. We should be fully rested & crewed not only for normal run of the mill days but rather for days when things go wrong. This is when our grey matter is really required & why passengers on CX pay top dollar for tickets. If we are not going to do this then we are playing with fire.

We also fly airbus through the ITCZ like AF447 so lets have some Res man power under our belts.

If there were pilots in Aussie able to fly on that said day then the CAD should have insisted on that rather than issue a Dispensation.

Thus I think it is worthy of an appeal.
crewsunite is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2009, 10:20
  #27 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: VHHH
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
FTL's are a limit and if we are being rostered flying to the limit of these then we have serious problems.

Do we fly our aircraft at 1 degree less than Max EGT for T/O constantly?
Do we fly at MMO constantly?

Doing this degrades the performance of not only the aircraft but our ability to fix a problem if something goes wrong.

SO Why roster to the max of the FTL's?
CokeZero is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2009, 10:26
  #28 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Out there
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Because they can and will continue to!
Baywatcher is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2009, 10:27
  #29 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: In the pollution
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why Roster to the Max of the FTL's?

Mate in HKG (and only HKG I might add), the CAD (and therefore KA and CX) deem the CAD document to be a "working document!" That means you can (and should) roster to these limits. No buffering need be applied.

I kid you not....from the FTL manager in KA....so don't hold your breath for any common sense.

What I love is that the very people who decide on the interpretations are the very people who don't have to go out and "do" the flight.

Gliderboy
gliderboy is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2009, 14:53
  #30 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: I go, therefore I am there!
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Pilots see FTL as limits.

Managers see FTL as targets.
arse is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2009, 15:45
  #31 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: my desk
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The F/O is HK based did not get a decent sleep for the last two nights and is completely stressed out. (Ie Divorce or what ever)

They have a technical problem in route (What ever) which stresses an elder CMD out, to the extent that he passes away as did a continental CMD recently.

Now you have a possibly low time experienced and completely fatigued / stressed out F/O in charge of a plane with a technical problem.

Lets hope he has plenty of fuel or the weather is gin clear in HK.
crewsunite, you forgot the one important detail that makes such a flight a non event. The all important computer flight plan!! With such a document you can show up for work in any state and the flight will proceed as predicted according to the plan. Here says the CAD.
Thunderbird4 is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2009, 17:43
  #32 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: mars
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Does that mean we should use our sick days to the limit as well? Like CC always say "it's legal"!
Humber10 is offline  
Old 21st Jun 2009, 23:29
  #33 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Humber. What a grand idea. I feel some PRA's coming on already! Cough, cough......
rick.shaw is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2009, 16:22
  #34 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: VHHH
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hey Humber10

i always use my sidestick to the limit.

Back and forth, back and forth, back and forth. And then we land.... he he he
CokeZero is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2009, 17:35
  #35 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: mars
Posts: 206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
me too, and then I come up to the cockpit....
Humber10 is offline  
Old 26th Jun 2009, 08:12
  #36 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: HK- A little bit of industrial China in every breath you take.
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you waive your rights to the protection of FTL's by accepting the dispensation, where do you stand of you have a fatigue related incident? My understanding is that you cant plead 'fatigue' as a contributing factor, as you chose to accept all responsibility for fatigue issues, and to 'dispense' with any protection that the so called regs afford you? (Yes I use the term protection loosely). Would be nice to have some legal advice on this, just not from a swires/cx sponsored court system.

TheHKAOA, the cx lapel badge helped identify who to give the 'lai see' to.
Lowkoon is offline  
Old 27th Jun 2009, 15:14
  #37 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Recently, one MEL flight was operated by 2 pilots but stopped at MNL for crew change. They must forget to ask CAD for dispensation.
hongkongpilot is offline  
Old 6th Jul 2009, 13:17
  #38 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From RTHK newsearlier today;

"The Cathay Pacific pilots' union has lost a legal challenge against a decision by the Civil Aviation Department to let a long-haul flight go ahead, despite being one pilot short of what safety regulations required. The union argued that the department did not have the power to make the decision, or alternatively, its decision was irrational. But in dismissing the union's case, the judge ruled that the department did have the power to permit one-off variations of the requirement for a three-man crew"

win some, lose some..?

Last edited by mcdude; 6th Jul 2009 at 13:29.
mcdude is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2009, 00:32
  #39 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: hong kong
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just proves that the HKCAD are a completely inept , behind the times and totally useless governmental organization.They are the backstop net, and yet they behave like this, AND get away with it .How much does the safety of 250+ pax cost ?.
AOA don't waist your time fighting this one ......
goathead is offline  
Old 7th Jul 2009, 01:17
  #40 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bob Tandy's place boozing with Darryl Hill
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Does this mean that KJP gets his office back?

CX's hefty tax payment to the HKSAR last year certainly seems to have been rewarded.

The words of our masters "Cathay Pacific rewards loyalty with loyalty".

AFL
ALPHA FLOOR is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.