Wikiposts
Search
Fragrant Harbour A forum for the large number of pilots (expats and locals) based with the various airlines in Hong Kong. Air Traffic Controllers are also warmly welcomed into the forum.

49er wins in UK

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18th Oct 2006, 18:32
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
49er wins in UK

The UK Employment Tribunal in Crofts v. Veta has found Veta guilty of Unfair dismissal, Failure to give reason(s) for dismissal and Breach of contract.
frankg is offline  
Old 18th Oct 2006, 19:24
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: CANADA
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What does this mean for the affected pilot? And what implications will this have for CX?
Cedar Tree is offline  
Old 18th Oct 2006, 19:45
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Over There
Posts: 740
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Interesting conclusion...

Where employees carry out their work in a number of
different locations (eg. airline pilots) it is important to look
at where they were based under both the terms of their
contract and in practice.
A peripatetic employee is held to be able to rely on the
unfair dismissal legislation if he is based in Great Britain.
Having taken into account a number of factors, including
the "basings policy" of Mr Crofts' employer, it was found that the centre of his operations was, "quite manifestly,
London"
cpdude is offline  
Old 18th Oct 2006, 21:20
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Delighted for Mr Crofts et al. By far the right decision and a shame the HKAOA did not see it through to the end.
Glass Half Empty is offline  
Old 18th Oct 2006, 22:46
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Over There
Posts: 740
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Glass Half Empty
Delighted for Mr Crofts et al. By far the right decision and a shame the HKAOA did not see it through to the end.
Give your anti-AOA rant a break will ya!

I'm happy for Mr. Crofts but how far was the AOA suppose to take a case like this?

Like Spock said, "the needs of the many outway the needs of the few or one".
cpdude is offline  
Old 18th Oct 2006, 22:46
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Can the Tribunal force Veta to rehire Mr. Crofts?

Like to thank the hundreds of CX pilots that helped support the court cases over the past year. I am sure the 49ers appreciate it.

Delighted to see the Pilots stand by their colleagues to the end. instead of cutting them free to battle on their own. Something to be proud of. Show your tie pin proudly, if you own one.

I am sure the UK based pilots will show their gratitude to the CPU for providing them protection under UK law.

Good news indeed.
Mr. Bloggs is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2006, 01:43
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: the rez
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Take a look at your conditions over the last 5 years cpdud, if you guys hadn't ran off you would still have some leverage. Now less than half the pilots are represented by the VAOA and the only organisation protecting your contract is the CPU.

If the UK pilots want to show their gratitude then they should look here The Cathay Pilots Union and consider helping the cause. It's not over yet, Hong Kong is next.
6feetunder is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2006, 05:02
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exclamation

Sorry 6 feet. How can you expect to pay for 3rd mortgages, a helicopter, C172, sport car, first wife and the Amah, which I married.

I just can’t afford it now. Not that I don’t believe it morally correct to do so, it’s about ME.
Mr. Bloggs is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2006, 08:20
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Boldly going where no split infinitive has gone before..
Posts: 4,785
Received 44 Likes on 20 Posts
I'm happy for Mr. Crofts but how far was the AOA suppose to take a case like this?
How far would you expect your union to suport YOU? They were happy enough to target new joiners and get THEM to abandon their aspirations, but when it came to the hip-pocket nerve....

Congrats Goerge, and shame on the AOA.
Wizofoz is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2006, 12:20
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: HKG
Posts: 1,410
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wizofoz,

With your enormous knowledge of everything to do with this you obviously know that a lot of AOA members still contribute to the legal fund.
BusyB is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2006, 12:21
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Over There
Posts: 740
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Wizofoz
How far would you expect your union to suport YOU? They were happy enough to target new joiners and get THEM to abandon their aspirations, but when it came to the hip-pocket nerve....
Congrats Goerge, and shame on the AOA.
How far? Until it was no longer reasonable to do so!

Company fires 49+ employees.

Company agrees to pay employees GBP66K on top of already paid 3 months severence.

Still very angry and upset, those employees continue to fight the company using emotion rather then brains, mostly at the AOA expense and win a final settlement in court of GBP70K.

Total legal cost...over GBP100K.

Was that smart??????????

Last edited by cpdude; 19th Oct 2006 at 13:04.
cpdude is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2006, 13:23
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Asia
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Errrrrr

In one word YES.
Five Green is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2006, 13:40
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Over There
Posts: 740
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Five Green
In one word YES.
Your opinion only but will they now repay their loans?
cpdude is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2006, 15:22
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Over There
Posts: 740
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by FCUX
cp dud, you are such a dork. still singing your ole song and dance about the aoa, instead of being happy for a guy getting his just due.
how is anyone to take you seriously anyway, when you quote star trek?
got your klingon halloween costume all picked out there?
A predicable and expected response from FCUX...again!

I thought I said I was happy for him but I just didn't think the outcome justified the fight.

I don't know why I'm explaining myself to a kid who should be more grateful that his daddy has such a good job at Cathay.
cpdude is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2006, 15:41
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: DT's cocaine mirror
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cpdude,
Do you not think labour protection for all UK based pilots under UK law justified the fight?
19weeler is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2006, 15:53
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Over There
Posts: 740
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 19weeler
Cpdude,
Do you not think labour protection for all UK based pilots under UK law justified the fight?
I think the coffin is now nailed shut and whatever value you see in that is obviously objective. The reality is CX learned their lesson years ago about a mass firing!

I do concede that my opinion is obviously taken in hind-sight. GBP70K is rather disappointing and had it been 5 years of lost salary, my opinion would again be different.
cpdude is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2006, 16:10
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: DT's cocaine mirror
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Its just a terrible shame that this was not achieved by the aoa, but by a small group of 49ers who were flushed down the tiolet by by the very group that this ruling benefits.
19weeler is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2006, 20:40
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Over There
Posts: 740
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 19weeler
Its just a terrible shame that this was not achieved by the aoa, but by a small group of 49ers who were flushed down the tiolet by by the very group that this ruling benefits.
I think "flushed down the tiolet" is a little strong considering most of the legal expenses was paid for by the AOA!
cpdude is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2006, 21:31
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: hong kong
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Still he does not get his job back so why is the CPU congratulating themselves. Went to their site and still no names on any letters etc, everything still secret so I seriously doubt their claims on hundreds of pilots donating and being members. Dont give us the line you are protecting our contract....CX realised long ago sacking the 49ers was wrong and will not try that one again.
CYRILJGROOVE is offline  
Old 19th Oct 2006, 22:42
  #20 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If it wasn't for the remaining 49ers and the CPU still going after CX you can be sure they would try it again, in a heartbeat. The CPU has enough money from enough pilots to see this thing through. Not once has a cost award gone against them in spite of the scare mongering by the former AOA President and his moronic GenSec. (by the way, he makes as much or more than a lot of Captains, getting value for your money?)

The AOA deliberately dumped the 49ers without any thought of the consequences. As far as the legal expenses go, when you ran away from the fight and hung your mates out to dry you pretty much gave up any claim to that.
frankg is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.