Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Fragrant Harbour
Reload this Page >

Six new 747-400ERFs on the way

Wikiposts
Search
Fragrant Harbour A forum for the large number of pilots (expats and locals) based with the various airlines in Hong Kong. Air Traffic Controllers are also warmly welcomed into the forum.

Six new 747-400ERFs on the way

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22nd Jun 2006, 11:24
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 1,879
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Six new 747-400ERFs on the way

Cathay has announced today that it has ordered six new -400ER freighters, for delivery beginning in 2008.

On the subject of -400 (or indeed -200) freighter ops, does anyone know if CX has minimum standards in relation to the airports/runways it operates from - obviously apart from having sufficient traffic to justify a 747F service?

Dublin has a runway of 8,650' and while there is a new runway due to be operational - in 2012 (!), there's little or no interest in extending the current runway. Presumably if CX is ordering -ERFs, it's going to be particularly interested in ensuring that runways at new destinations are capable of supporting longer nonstop flights. HKG would clearly be a superb cargo destination ex-DUB, but I'm thinking that the runway length would probably rule it out. Any thoughts?
akerosid is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2006, 11:43
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: the rez
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What was it that clown Clemmow said? "....there's no money in freight."

Yeah right!
6feetunder is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2006, 12:19
  #3 (permalink)  
The Reverend
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Sydney,NSW,Australia
Posts: 2,020
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It wasn't Clemmow, the original statement was made by Sir John Bremridge (RIP).
HotDog is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2006, 13:46
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: europe
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
where did you get that information from pls ?

what is going on regarding that new freight joint venture with air china in shanghai ? the ac order could be for them...
sisyphos is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2006, 15:19
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Asia
Age: 56
Posts: 2,600
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
22 June 2006

Cathay Press Release.

Cathay Pacific makes biggest ever order for freighter fleet expansion

Cathay Pacific Airways today made its biggest ever commitment for new freighter aircraft with an order for six Boeing 747-400ERF, Extended Range Freighters, as it continues to invest in additional cargo capacity to meet aggressive growth plans for the Hong Kong hub.

The six new aircraft are scheduled to arrive between May 2008 and April 2009. Cathay Pacific currently operates 97 aircraft, 14 of which are freighters, including one 747-400BCF, Boeing Converted Freighters, six 747-400 and seven 747-200 freighters. In 1997, there were just six freighters in the airline. This latest investment, together with an outstanding order of five 747-400BCFs, will further expand Cathay Pacific’s freighter fleet.

Cathay Pacific Chief Executive Philip Chen said: "This latest investment further underscores our long-term commitment to invest in Hong Kong, and is an expression of our confidence in Hong Kong as the premier aviation hub in the Asia Pacific region. Cargo is a major contributor to our continued growth, and we are committed to expanding our freighter fleet to ensure it plays a key role in the future of both Cathay Pacific and Hong Kong as a leading cargo hub."

The 747-400ERF has a maximum payload of 248,600 pounds (112,760 kg) and can carry 22,000 pounds (9,980 kg) more than other 747-400 freighters on long-range flights at maximum takeoff weight. It has a maximum range of 9,200 km, about 525 km farther than other 747-400 freighters, and has a strengthened fuselage, landing gear and parts of its wing, along with new, larger tyres.

The new aircraft will be powered by Pratt & Whitney PW4062A engines and deployed on trunk routes to North America to take full advantage of their superior payload range capability.

The airline took delivery of the world’s first 747-400BCF in December last year. A second is due next month and a third in September this year. Three more will enter service in 2007. The airline has retained its options on a further six 747-400BCFs which are now scheduled for delivery from the end of 2008 to 2010.

Cathay Pacific last month added the 28th online freighter destination to its network with the launch of a new twice-weekly service to Chennai, India. More new freighter destinations services to Stockholm and Toronto are due to be launched later this year as part of the airline’s plan to build its network, thereby strengthening Hong Kong’s hub position.
404 Titan is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2006, 17:51
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
No RR power.
787FOCAL is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2006, 18:09
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: .
Posts: 2,997
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

Dublin via Manchester I heard.
spannersatcx is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2006, 18:51
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 787FOCAL
No RR power.
According to the Boeing site, RR power is not an option for the -400ERF.

Mayday
mayday911 is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2006, 19:39
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Over There
Posts: 740
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 787FOCAL
No RR power.
Not enough power!
cpdude is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2006, 19:59
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: HK
Age: 49
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
More likely, politics. I read an article a while back about Boeing requiring engine makers to share in the expense/risk of aircraft manufacturing. RR was the only engine maker to say, no. Hence, the 787 is powered by GEs. Might be the same with the 744ERFs.

BBB
bigbeerbelly is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2006, 21:42
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Everywhere
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
what is the main export via air from DUB - Guinness?
Glass Half Empty is offline  
Old 22nd Jun 2006, 23:17
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Over There
Posts: 740
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bigbeerbelly
More likely, politics. I read an article a while back about Boeing requiring engine makers to share in the expense/risk of aircraft manufacturing. RR was the only engine maker to say, no. Hence, the 787 is powered by GEs. Might be the same with the 744ERFs.
BBB
Yes, politics on the 787 as they didn't want to play by Boeing's rules but the RB211 just can't produce the power the ER requires with the extra weight.

The ER engines are the PW which produces 63,300lbs and the GE which is 62,100lbs. The RR is only available on the -400 with a max TOW of 396,890 because it is limited to 59,500lbs. This is the same engine used on the -100/200 with only 50,100lbs where as the GE and PW were completely different cores.
cpdude is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2006, 00:10
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Asia
Age: 56
Posts: 2,600
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
bigbeerbelly & cpdude

More likely, politics. I read an article a while back about Boeing requiring engine makers to share in the expense/risk of aircraft manufacturing. RR was the only engine maker to say, no. Hence, the 787 is powered by GEs. Might be the same with the 744ERFs.
Actually the 787 is available with both GE and RR engines. I also remember reading somewhere that an airframe can be changed from being powered by one engine manufacturer to another in a matter of hours not weeks as is now the case with current aircraft design. It is meant to appeal to leasing companies that can quickly change an engine spec on an airframe to suit a new leasing requirement.


The engines on offer for the B787 are:

Trent 1000 or GEnx

Boeing 787 Dreamliner Suppliers
404 Titan is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2006, 00:53
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: 3.5 from TD
Age: 47
Posts: 1,042
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think Cathay are also starting to see the light on the subject of engines. Less moving parts, less maintenance. It's as simple as that.

They are starting to get some experience on the the 3 PW aircraft on line now. I think the reason they were originally so hot for the RB-211 was that it was british made. With the cultural landscape at CX changing rapidly, I think costs, not politics, are now the main factor in deciding which powerplant to choose.

I flew the PW aircraft, and I gotta say, they are quietter, smoother, and a bit slicker. They also start better with no pause from fuel introduction to lightoff. Just one continuous N2 and EGT rise. The cabin crew also agreed. They came up to us in BKK and comented that the noise level was much lower and that the aircraft seemed a lot smoother. You can't even hear the engines from the flight deck until you aply TO thrust. Plus, as soon as the brake is released, the aircraft rolls without adding thrust. Although, that is probably due to the Idle setting as opposed to having more thrust. With 3 spools, the rollers probably idle at a lower, more fuel efficient setting (they have to sustain combustion with the much smaller N3 spinning as opposed to the bigger N2 spool on the Pratt.)

Back to the subject, I guess this confirms that rumor that CX had reserved the last few slots on the 400F line? I wonder if the fact that the Advanced is coming lowered the price on the 400F to entice CX to purchase them.

Since the deliveries are later on in 2008, I hope they end up changing them to Advanced 748 versions.

On a side note, I think I saw in some manual that the Roller's thrust is closer to 62K. Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't that a result from the G/H T core upgrade?? I believe the straight RB-211 524G is lower thrust, but these are moded engines with an improved core.

Either way, I hope these aircraft come to CX, not any other carrier. I saw a little tid bit last week about CX helping Dragon Air with their "BCF operation". I didn't even know Dragon had a BCF operation, not to mention that it needed help. Any Dragon guys care to comment on that? Would love to know if the planned 6 BCFs are going to Dragon, or if they are expecting to order some of their own
Sqwak7700 is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2006, 01:02
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Asia
Age: 56
Posts: 2,600
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sqwak7700

Dragon has a separate order for B744BCF than Cathay. There is also a recruitment ban in place by the Dragon Air Pilots Union in regards to the crap conditions on offer for flight crew on these new aircraft.
404 Titan is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2006, 03:30
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,841
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Anyone know what there intention is with the 747 classics?

Aussie
Aussie is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2006, 04:04
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Over There
Posts: 740
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Sqwak7700
On a side note, I think I saw in some manual that the Roller's thrust is closer to 62K. Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't that a result from the G/H T core upgrade?? I believe the straight RB-211 524G is lower thrust, but these are moded engines with an improved core.
I wonder if you were reading the Trent 500 manual which the Airbus 600 has. They are max rated at 62,000lbs. I do have to ammend my 59,500lbs statement as I found an article stating 60,600lbs for the 524H-T.

Also, the evolution engine the Trent 600 which is derived from the 524L is rated from 68,000-72,000lbs but I don't believe anyone has ordered it but I could be wrong here.
cpdude is offline  
Old 23rd Jun 2006, 05:47
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hmmmm. The RR, at longest ranges, has the best SFC. Most Brake release power too, but does lapse the fastest. I think it is something else.
787FOCAL is offline  
Old 24th Jun 2006, 21:13
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: North America
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by cpdude
I wonder if you were reading the Trent 500 manual which the Airbus 600 has. They are max rated at 62,000lbs. I do have to ammend my 59,500lbs statement as I found an article stating 60,600lbs for the 524H-T.
Also, the evolution engine the Trent 600 which is derived from the 524L is rated from 68,000-72,000lbs but I don't believe anyone has ordered it but I could be wrong here.
The Trent core' "T", runs with a little cooler EGT's and a tad bit more efficient I believe.
colts19 is offline  
Old 25th Jun 2006, 19:09
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Australia
Posts: 209
Received 6 Likes on 2 Posts
CX's website "Fact Sheet" also states that there are 5 x 747-400's for delivery over the next 24 months.

Could someone please confirm that these are straight pax 400's? (in addition to the 6 x 400ERF's and 6 x BCF's).

Are these to replace the ones going under the knife for BCF treatment?

Thanks.
TruBlu351 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.