Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > PPRuNe Worldwide > Fragrant Harbour
Reload this Page >

KA/CX recrutment BAN?

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Fragrant Harbour A forum for the large number of pilots (expats and locals) based with the various airlines in Hong Kong. Air Traffic Controllers are also warmly welcomed into the forum.

KA/CX recrutment BAN?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th April 2006 | 03:47
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: Dununda
Question KA/CX recrutment BAN?

What’s up with the recruitment ban on KA (ifalpa.org) as far as I can see the Ban is for any and all recruiting at KA and not limited to the 400’s.

Is this the case?
Will it have as much influence as the CX ban of a few years ago? i.e. NONE

And do the guys that took up the job offer with CX during the ban have the right to complain about the DE FO rumours?
Fred Astaire is offline  
Old 11th April 2006 | 04:57
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
From: Australia
The Ban is soley for the 747-400 DE only. No restrictions for KA Pax Airbus fleet or even the 747 Classic MAN Base.

It should have a very good infleuence as we are only talking about qualified/experienced people here. Not, as in the CX case, people looking to get out of GA into an Airline (for example ) as a 2nd officer. These people were being asked to give up their dream job for a group of people they didn't even know.

Anyone qualified for the DE KA 747-400 ad, will look at whats being offerd and together with the ban/industrial action and just move on to the next job ad. ( If they have half a brain )
CAPT146 is offline  
Old 11th April 2006 | 05:38
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
From: a few places
By the time the DEFO's start rolling up, 80% the S/O's who joined during the ban will have been upgraded.
And yes I think they (the S/O's) and most of the people in CX will complain about the DEFO's if it is on 'C' scale package or a 'D' scale or any scale that is lower than what is on offer now for pax fleet F/O's.
Team America is offline  
Old 11th April 2006 | 13:24
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 376
Likes: 0
From: Disneyland - with Mickey Mouse
And dudes (eg. S/O's) who joined CX, but NOT from a GA outfit, might consider walking down a different street - should the DEFO pax proposal come through. At the end of the day CX is nothing but just another Airline - and there are other airlines out there.

Happy flying where ever that might be.
Y
Yeager is offline  
Old 11th April 2006 | 13:53
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
From: Europe
Word on the street from a KA manager is that they will be launching another AOC to crew the 744 so the employment ban will be null and void anyway.
AnQrKa is offline  
Old 11th April 2006 | 16:11
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 677
Likes: 0
From: York International
If they are thinking of that then the writ the DPA have issued re breach of contract is working. I'm not so sure that the CAD will want them to have another AOC however. This will get interesting.
Fly747 is offline  
Old 2nd May 2006 | 03:28
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
From: Here and There
I apologize for my ignorance, but can anyone tell me what this recruitment ban is all about. Why recruitment ban? I'm considering to apply (3500+ hrs B747-400).

Thanks
Avius is offline  
Old 2nd May 2006 | 12:03
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 677
Likes: 0
From: York International
Avius, try this link to the Dragonair Pilot's association web site which should help to answer your question. As has been stated elsewhere you are very welcome if you join Dragonair, just not on the -400.
http://www.dpa.hk/docs/Dear%20Prospe...r%20Pilots.pdf
Fly747 is offline  
Old 2nd May 2006 | 12:56
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
From: Here and There
Fly747

Thanks for the info. Much appreciated. Looks like there is quite a battlezone, which I don't want to be a part of. Good luck.
Avius is offline  
Old 3rd May 2006 | 23:50
  #10 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 569
Likes: 24
From: Accruing MilliSiverts
Cut and pasted from another thread but very relevant here:

Dragonair has sacked/demoted two pilots. It seems probable that it may lose a looming court case for the 747-400 freighter (where management are obliged to discuss non-HK bases with the pilot union) and is using the threat of then setting up a separate AOC to bypass such a decision. It appears the management line is the pilot union is acting alone as a 'wildcat', when really it is just reflecting the concerns of all it's members. In short, a provocative management style has resulted in a pressure-cooker environment. Real/potential departures of many individual pilots have happenned and are about to increase markedly.

Given the following, wouldn't it be a very silly airline management that p1ssed their aircrew off too much:

Emirates by many accounts about to meltdown. Not enough pilots (recruiting is only replacing those who leave). Pilots at max hours and leave cancelled etc. Currently not increasing pay and conditions but watch this space. 1 aircraft per minute for the next 100 years or whatever they are getting. I believe there were not enough 'traditional' Euro-type pilots so they turned to India & Philippines, but...

India Already melting down. Not enough pilots. Something like 4000 qualified captains needed in the next 2 years? Check out the ever-improving contracts there.

Philippines Major problems, so many pilots leaving that they are having trouble manning flights. Not enough pilots.

Japan Some of the better paying pilot positions (for the present, will only get better) but even then, major problems creeping up. Something like 40% of the ANA and JAL pilot group must leave due age over the next 3 years. There just aren't the replacements. Not enough pilots.

Asia Generally Cathay need 200+ pilots per year. Singapore need many as well. Mainland China is booming and can only train 400 pilots annually when over 2000 are required. Korean, China Airlines, Eva and Asiana all have major replacement/expansion plans and simply too few pilots for this. Not enough pilots.

Qatar/Etihad etc What will they do? they have Not enough pilots.

The answer is of course they will all have to offer the option of workable bases in home countries for expat pilots, better money and sensible rostering. Whoever doesn't will have parked airframes costing lost of $$$$ and it will be their own fault.

Flying schools just aren't producing the numbers they have historically and airforces have both downsized and also don't lose the numbers of pilots they once did.

Yes, there is always an element of 'the grass is greener' with pilots but it is a brave (suggest very stupid) management who choses this time to get aircrew offside.
Al E. Vator is offline  
Old 4th May 2006 | 12:15
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 87
Likes: 0
From: dowund
Not enough pilots
Not enough pilots
Not enough pilots
Not enough pilots
Not enough pilots
cpahka is offline  
Old 4th May 2006 | 13:21
  #12 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 569
Likes: 24
From: Accruing MilliSiverts
mmmm.........good point cpa.
Al E. Vator is offline  
Old 4th May 2006 | 18:40
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
From: Here and There
cpahka,

a picture speaks more than 1000 words. you nailed it. great post.
Avius is offline  
Old 7th May 2006 | 06:57
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 290
Likes: 9
From: Europe
Anybody got any idea how to get in to KA or CX with only 1500TT but 1000hrs heavy jet on same/simiar routes?

I am assuming that the HR people will reject as soon as they see the TT figure....
Arrowhead is offline  
Old 7th May 2006 | 07:46
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 677
Likes: 0
From: York International
If you don't send it in you will never know, criteria for selection change all the time. It is important with both companies to show interest and then regularly update yoiur CV.
Fly747 is offline  
Old 7th May 2006 | 09:18
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
From: Andrewsfield
India Already melting down. Not enough pilots. Something like 4000 qualified captains needed
Of course, don't forget there is also an IFALPA recruitment ban for Air India.
http://www.ifalpa.org/jobs/index.htm
Farns744 is offline  
Old 23rd May 2006 | 07:34
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
From: Singapore
Just my thoughts, nursing our own insecurity and ego's won't help in any episode of despute, and these will certainly be the "norms" in the future of us airline aviators, the world has changed now, its a new ground we must acknowledge, and somehow new strategies must now come in place. Just have no idea what it is now
dizzyhytes is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.