Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Flying Instructors & Examiners
Reload this Page >

X wind and drift calculations.

Wikiposts
Search
Flying Instructors & Examiners A place for instructors to communicate with one another because some of them get a bit tired of the attitude that instructing is the lowest form of aviation, as seems to prevail on some of the other forums!

X wind and drift calculations.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 25th May 2003, 22:32
  #1 (permalink)  


Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Orlando, Florida
Age: 68
Posts: 2,586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
X wind and drift calculations.

Mental powers only!! No computers, calculators - nothing but brain cells.

Sat at the end of the runway, have been given a take-off clearance which included the latest, up to the second, surface wind report.

How do you calculate if the wind is within X wind limits?

Next question - whilst en-route (or holding at a beacon), you need to calculate the current drift - lets put the aircraft in IMC (so you have no ground features to look at). Remember - no machines (includes radio aids). All you have is wind velocity as given by ATC or the weatherman - and a track required).

Go for it.
Keygrip is offline  
Old 25th May 2003, 23:03
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,822
Received 271 Likes on 110 Posts
Use the 'clock' method:

15 deg off=1/4 W/V
20 deg off=1/3 W/V
30 deg off=1/2 W/V
45 deg off=3/4 W/V
60 or more, use all W/V


Max drift is equal to W/V divided by your TAS in mi/min. So if you're doing 180KTAS, that's 3 mi/min. If the W/V is 30kts, max possible drift is 30/3 = 10 deg. Now apply clock factor as above; if the W/V is 210/30 and you're holding on 240 deg inbound, use 1/2 max drift and steer 235 deg inbound. Outbound use 3 times that, i.e. 15 deg and make your heading 075 deg.

Now try it bouncing around in a single engine aeroplane at 90 kts without a gyro compass, no autopilot and no co-pilot. At night and in IMC!

You can use a similar method to recompute your GS using (90-angle off) and the clock factor. So if the track is 060, TAS is 180Kts and the W/V is 120/30, your heading should be approx 070 deg and GS 165Kts.
BEagle is offline  
Old 25th May 2003, 23:17
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Surrey, UK.
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not an answer from me, but if you're going to cross-post can you put the link to this on the other thread in PF please?

Last edited by rustle; 26th May 2003 at 01:35.
rustle is offline  
Old 26th May 2003, 02:16
  #4 (permalink)  


Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Orlando, Florida
Age: 68
Posts: 2,586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BEagle - nice one. Now I put on the "devils advocate" hat and say, "Ah, but what if the ACTUAL drift at altitude is only, say, three degrees - but the MAX drift at that altitude is as much as eight degrees."

You lay off 3 x 8° (24°) outbound in the hold - when it should only be 9°. What will that do to the inbound?

(rustle: darned good point, sir!! That's what comes of posting before your second cup of coffee in the morning. I've done it for you now).
Keygrip is offline  
Old 26th May 2003, 03:30
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,822
Received 271 Likes on 110 Posts
I write simple for American...

Max drift is the drift you would experience if the wind was at 90 deg to your track. It is calculated like what I done bin' sayin', y'all.

Actual drift is the component (sorry about the long word) of the maximum, sorry, max drift resulting from the actual wind direction compared to your track.

Have a nice day....
BEagle is offline  
Old 26th May 2003, 05:15
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: London, UK
Posts: 778
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If BEagle's clock-code system isn't scientific enough for you, what you're doing to determine the crosswind component is multiplying the sine of the angle of the wind by its speed. To do this, you need the sine of that angle. The clock-code is plenty accurate enough for determining the sine of that angle and better still errs on the side of caution at the greater angles.

For the first question - the calculation at takeoff is pretty easy using that clock code. 15deg wind - a quarter of the wind speed is crosswind. 30deg wind - half the wind speed is crosswind. 45 its three quarters. Just these three alone are accurate enough for most purposes I would have thought.

For the second question, use BEagle's method again. In a training aircraft doing around 110 knots I'd call it 2 miles a minute, so halve the windspeed and apply the clock code.

As for how you get the windspeed (before you're even tracking a beacon) if you're at 2000' you can take the surface wind from ATC, double it and add 30deg (in the UK) for a rough estimate.
drauk is offline  
Old 26th May 2003, 12:14
  #7 (permalink)  


Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Orlando, Florida
Age: 68
Posts: 2,586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BEagle - apologies on two counts.

1st: I missed the line
Now apply clock factor as above;
from your paragraph about converting max drift to actual drift.

2nd: I misjudged you. I thought that as an educated and experienced pilot with examiner qualifications, you would be able to instruct without lowering your standards to sarcasm. I was obviously wrong.

The whole point of the thread was to try to educate some of those with lesser experience than yourself, who may not have heard the "rules of thumb" before. What a pity you had to be so smart a**e about it - I thought I could rely on people like you to give intelligent responses. Sorry.
Keygrip is offline  
Old 26th May 2003, 15:55
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,822
Received 271 Likes on 110 Posts
Sorry if it came over as sarcasm - 'twas supposed to be a cheeky hint to re-read what should have been an easily understood post!

Hence the !

But sorry if you were offended.

Now - have a nice day!!


PS - I deliberately avoided using the sine of the wind angle as referred to by drauk in order to keep things simple.
BEagle is offline  
Old 27th May 2003, 05:28
  #9 (permalink)  


Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Orlando, Florida
Age: 68
Posts: 2,586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OK - truce.

I've been taken the wrong way on occassions when it is impossible to put real emotions - the smileys are a good start, but rarely cut it.

I most certainly read it as a nasty and unhelpful response.

Glad it wasn't meant that way - as I do respect (most of ) the answers you give to these pages.
Keygrip is offline  
Old 27th May 2003, 05:35
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,822
Received 271 Likes on 110 Posts
Truce it is!

.........but no tongues when kissing to make up, OK? =


Back to the original topic of 'max drift' and the 'clock factor'- this method was taught to all UK military students once they'd learned to grapple with the whizz-wheel first. It's so easy that some people think that it's somehow cheating. But it's accurate enough - and in any case, how accurate is the wind estimate?

The KISS principle works just fine in aviation - as does 'TLAR':

That Looks About Right!
BEagle is offline  
Old 28th May 2003, 06:55
  #11 (permalink)  
DFC
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Euroland
Posts: 2,814
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If one finds it hard to remember the above angles and factors, remember the 6th sense;

10 deg - 1/6
20 deg - 2/6
30 deg - 3/6
40 deg - 4/6
50 deg - 5/6
60 deg (or more) - 6/6

It is the exact same as the above but I find it more instinctive and easier to remember.

Regards,

DFC
DFC is offline  
Old 28th May 2003, 20:01
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: A PC!
Posts: 594
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BEagle - TLAR is my favourite tool for flying and is amazingly accurate!!!

Applies to aeroplane design, too - Spitfire, Hunter, Victor, VC10, Vulcan, Concorde etc.
moggie is offline  
Old 29th May 2003, 06:40
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver Island
Posts: 2,517
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hmmmm....


Now try it bouncing around in a single engine airplane at 90 kts. without a gyro compass, no autopilot and no co-pilot. At night and in IMC!

This question about drift would then be a moot point because the pilot would not have enough brain cells to figure it out..

Chuck E.
Chuck Ellsworth is offline  
Old 29th May 2003, 07:44
  #14 (permalink)  


Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Orlando, Florida
Age: 68
Posts: 2,586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Now try it bouncing around in a single engine airplane at 90 kts. without a gyro compass, no autopilot and no co-pilot. At night and in IMC!
You mean a standard British flight, Chuck?

Yeah - they could hack that - and do the math. Usual scenario actually.
Keygrip is offline  
Old 29th May 2003, 08:47
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver Island
Posts: 2,517
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Keygrip:

I was just giving BEagle a hard time.
Chuck Ellsworth is offline  
Old 29th May 2003, 11:58
  #16 (permalink)  


Moderator
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Orlando, Florida
Age: 68
Posts: 2,586
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry, Chuck - need more beer (not doing well at spotting sarcasms on this one).
Keygrip is offline  
Old 29th May 2003, 23:28
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,822
Received 271 Likes on 110 Posts
Of course if you're lucky enough to be flying in the clear air of beautiful BC, I guess that you have no problem!
BEagle is offline  
Old 30th May 2003, 00:17
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver Island
Posts: 2,517
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Actually living here on Vancouver Island is just about the same as living in England weather wise.

And we are catching up to you in the tax and fee department.

By the way I should be back at North Weald in about ten days or so.

Chuck
Chuck Ellsworth is offline  
Old 30th May 2003, 22:54
  #19 (permalink)  

Why do it if it's not fun?
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Bournemouth
Posts: 4,779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Keygrip, not sure what part of Britain you fly in, but near me I can't find anywhere to fly at night, whether it's with or without gyro compass, auto-pilot, co-pilot and in IMC.

FFF
-------------
FlyingForFun is offline  
Old 4th Jun 2003, 22:57
  #20 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: ask crewing
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question

Understand most of that but could someone tell me what the KISS technique and TLAR are.
Thanks
Cloud Chaser is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.