Wikiposts
Search
Flying Instructors & Examiners A place for instructors to communicate with one another because some of them get a bit tired of the attitude that instructing is the lowest form of aviation, as seems to prevail on some of the other forums!

Senior Examiner (RT)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 29th Nov 2019, 18:17
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: 55N
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Senior Examiner (RT)

Anyone heard or been advised of any developments on this?
justmaybe is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2019, 19:00
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've heard some interviews took place this week
bylgw is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2019, 21:20
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 6,580
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Published here: quite bizarre.
Whopity is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2019, 22:18
  #4 (permalink)  

de minimus non curat lex
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: sunny troon
Posts: 1,488
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Interesting how this element has developed over the years. IFR airways flight in 1972 for my VHF test. Then CAP46 replaced by CAP413. Option not to have a practical test in the1980s to a “how goes it” sign off which definitely resulted in a lowering of standards/quality. Then the reintroduction of the synthetic flight.
I will always remember learning to fly at Carlisle. Blackpool flying club aircraft comes on frequency. Transfers to Newcastle eventually, ending the conversation with “over and out”. Their quality of R/T was to say the least interesting.

The present test which is fine for the flying club VFR operations, but little to do with CPL/IR training, line flying R/T for the MCC onwards.

Development of airspace, GPS etc all needs to be taken into account.
parkfell is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2019, 09:22
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 6,580
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
The current RT practical test format will be replaced by an oral assessment conducted by the RT examiner.
A bit like some non standard examiners have operated for a number of years. Overall, a complete waste of time.
The newly appointed SE (RT) will form a panel of examiners, delegated by the CAA to manage oversight of the 160+ RT examiners, and the training and testing for FRTOL in the UK and overseas.
The SE’s will be responsible for training and testing all new RT examiners, plus the conducting of three yearly assessments of competence, for the revalidation or renewal of examiner privileges.
Presumably the RTF Examiners will have to fund the SE (RT) because the CAA are not!
Attend in person regular meetings for the next 12months at Aviation House Gatwick and other locations, and attend a minimum of 2 meetings per year thereafter, at your own expense
Net result will be no renewal of existing RTF Examiners, because it will no longer be cost effective.
We have now received expressions of interest from 66 RT examiners, of which 55 meet the experience criteria set for the initial phase of this process.
And how many if any bothered to respond further?
Whopity is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2019, 09:57
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: 50+ north
Posts: 1,253
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Surely its not (according to ICAO) RT or R/T, its RTF!

What hope do we have if the apparently world class regualtor still gets it wrong!
TCAS FAN is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2019, 18:34
  #7 (permalink)  

de minimus non curat lex
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: sunny troon
Posts: 1,488
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
If that was the only chink in the CAA armour, I would be relatively content.
parkfell is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2019, 21:48
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Down at the sharp pointy end, where all the weather is made.
Age: 74
Posts: 1,684
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Surely its not (according to ICAO) RT or R/T, its RTF!

What hope do we have if the apparently world class regulator still gets it wrong!
Well, in this case, I think it's ICAO that needs to amend. They seem to have made the letter 'F' stand for '-phony', if you want a TLA, surely it should be RTP?

I think RT or R/T stands well for Radio Telephony, as a complementary term to and to distinguish it from W/T or Wireless Telegraphy.

I had thought vaguely of applying as I qualify for the time experience, but just short of the total number of tests. Thank goodness I don't qualify if it's going to cost me money! I hope there's going to be someone within a day's round trip to revalidate me when the time comes. I also hope it's an opportunity to tidy up some aspects of the test that I find unsatisfactory. Unlike the examiners that Whopity alludes to (not for the first time), I try to play it by the book. Without going in to details here, there are several things that just plain get in the way of getting the test done, distracting the candidate. I find myself saying half a dozen times during the test 'it's not a navigation exercise'.

TOO
TheOddOne is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2019, 09:29
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 6,580
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
They seem to have made the letter 'F' stand for '-phony', if you want a TLA, surely it should be RTP?
It comes from "radiotelefone" hence RTF. A bit like the "e" that was put on the end of Concord.
You must be using RANT if you have to make the comments about navigation! One of the drawbacks of that method, not an issue with traditional test equipment.
Whopity is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2019, 12:43
  #10 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: 55N
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Whopity
It comes from "radiotelefone" hence RTF. A bit like the "e" that was put on the end of Concord.
You must be using RANT if you have to make the comments about navigation! One of the drawbacks of that method, not an issue with traditional test equipment.
Still using a kit (Master Station/Student Station) that Mike Grierson recommended way back in the day. Think it was made to order, but a good robust bit of kit.
justmaybe is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2019, 22:02
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Down at the sharp pointy end, where all the weather is made.
Age: 74
Posts: 1,684
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
fone
Slang for phone. It is used by people who don't fully understand the English language and feel the need to spell it phonetically. Or somehow think that not typing in one letter saves them time.

From the Urban Dictionary...

Hat, coat.

TOO
TheOddOne is offline  
Old 1st Dec 2019, 23:23
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 6,580
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
It comes from the Italian radiotelefono, remember Marconi was one of theirs.
Whopity is offline  
Old 2nd Dec 2019, 16:41
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Posts: 26,806
Received 270 Likes on 109 Posts
Radio Téléphonie sans Fil, surely? Like many early aeronautical terms (longeron, aileron, monocoque), it comes from the French, n'est ce pas?
BEagle is online now  
Old 2nd Dec 2019, 21:22
  #14 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 6,580
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
RTF was originally Radio Telegraphy sans Fils which became W/T; Telephonie being a later development.
Either way the influence was Continental and as ICAO HQ is located in a French speaking town, English was not the primary consideration.
Whopity is offline  
Old 3rd Dec 2019, 17:35
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 1,041
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
RT examiners, good little earner, like i saw one do four tests in a day and earn more than i do instructing in a month.
And i have noticed the customers are no better capable after the test, than good instruction from flying instructors from the start.
BigEndBob is offline  
Old 3rd Dec 2019, 18:35
  #16 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Down at the sharp pointy end, where all the weather is made.
Age: 74
Posts: 1,684
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
like i saw one do four tests in a day
...I'd say that's a very long day. I allocate a half day for each test. With the initial briefing and a verbal assessment of whether or not they are going to pass (I don't fail people, I just don't do the test if I don't think they're ready) and the actual test taking about an hour and a half, it takes a half day. I start by asking where abouts in CAP413 they can show me emergency procedures (for instance). If they say 'what's CAP 413', I abandon the test. I must also say that I find it quite taxing and tiring, even after having done 50+ tests. It's a welcome relief to do some instructional flying afterwards! Actually, I'd earn more from 2 hours flying, so I try and book tests for wet days, not always possible.

TOO
TheOddOne is offline  
Old 3rd Dec 2019, 19:09
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 6,580
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
I've heard of an Examiner doing 10 tests in a day whilst his equipment was unserviceable! The method used is the one the CAA is proposing to adopt, a chat across a desk.
Whopity is offline  
Old 23rd Dec 2019, 22:26
  #18 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: 55N
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Latest episode released.
justmaybe is offline  
Old 2nd Jan 2020, 22:56
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 6,580
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Latest episode released.
Can't find anything!
Whopity is offline  
Old 3rd Jan 2020, 13:59
  #20 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: 55N
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Here we are:
https://mailchi.mp/f1e2ff025c09/uk-c...3?e=3911f5f1b3
justmaybe is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.