Wikiposts
Search
Flying Instructors & Examiners A place for instructors to communicate with one another because some of them get a bit tired of the attitude that instructing is the lowest form of aviation, as seems to prevail on some of the other forums!

Seven year itch....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 29th Sep 2015, 23:52
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hotel this week, hotel next week, home whenever...
Posts: 1,492
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Seven year itch....

Searched the forums but can't find what I thought was there....

Somebody has presented with an IR on a JAA licence that expired 31/10/2008. They wish to renew their MEP and IR. Those good at math will note the 7 years is up next month. Let's say they've been playing in the sand pit with a "non-EASA" (but ICAO) licence with an IR attached.

They've not flown MEP for a while and accept the "full course" may be necessary, but with that and some re-tread for the IR, time is going to be tight.

I thought there was a get-out but all I can find at the moment is reference to PART-FCL IRs and the 7 year period.

Any comments/pointers or am I dreaming?

I have yet to complete a training assessment , so it may yet all turn out to be academic anyway!
Duchess_Driver is offline  
Old 30th Sep 2015, 06:23
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Here and there
Posts: 534
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The UK CAA has adopted a derogation such that where a pilot holds or has held an Instrument Rating issued by a third country and that rating is compliant with Annex I to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, the applicability of FCL.625 IR(c) and (d) may be based on the validity dates of the Instrument Rating of that other country.
CAP 804, Section 4, Part G, Subpart 1, page 4/5.

ifitaint...
ifitaintboeing is offline  
Old 30th Sep 2015, 07:20
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 6,581
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Whatever happened to the concept of Competency Based Training; find out what they can and can't do, then make good the difference? Of course that went out with the old CAA!
Whopity is offline  
Old 30th Sep 2015, 08:51
  #4 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hotel this week, hotel next week, home whenever...
Posts: 1,492
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quote:

The UK CAA has adopted a derogation such that where a pilot holds or has held an Instrument Rating issued by a third country and that rating is compliant with Annex I to the Convention on International Civil Aviation, the applicability of FCL.625 IR(c) and (d) may be based on the validity dates of the Instrument Rating of that other country.
CAP 804, Section 4, Part G, Subpart 1, page 4/5.

ifitaint...
And yet the CAA Renewal form clearly refers to a PART-FCL IR and the 7 year requirement!

Unfortunately this isn't the UK CAA so I now need to look at the appropriate competent authority for their derogations/policy.

Whatever happened to the concept of Competency Based Training; find out what they can and can't do, then make good the difference? Of course that went out with the old CAA!
Far too sensible an approach.... it'll never catch on!

Thanks
Duchess_Driver is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2015, 08:39
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Here and there
Posts: 534
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Whilst it is currently a UK CAA derogation, EASA have included it in NPA 2014-29 within an amended FCL.625 so in any case, assuming it is adopted, will be applicable across all EASA states soon.

ifitaint...
ifitaintboeing is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2015, 19:28
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: France
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
An IR-SE renewal is cheap, is a good training anyway, and solves the problem.
172510 is offline  
Old 4th Oct 2015, 13:50
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Minnesota USA
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Citation III/VI/VII type

Does anyone recommend a reasonable Citation III/VI/VII type?
looking for a type rating.

Thanks
airman24 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.