Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Flying Instructors & Examiners
Reload this Page >

MEPL-only licence issues

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Flying Instructors & Examiners A place for instructors to communicate with one another because some of them get a bit tired of the attitude that instructing is the lowest form of aviation, as seems to prevail on some of the other forums!

MEPL-only licence issues

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11th August 2007 | 21:15
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 1999
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 899
Likes: 42
From: Slowly decaying (disgracefully)
MEPL-only licence issues

The situation:
  • A chap currently has an NPPL
  • He has many thousands of MEP hours as an RAF pilot in the 50s and 60s
  • He's just passed his class 2 JAR medical
  • He wants to get a JAR licence issued with only an MEPL rating

From my reading of LASORS, if he wanted to change from an NPPL to a JAR PPL with an SEPL he would need 20 hours instruction from a JAR FI but if he wants to train for an MEPL he only needs to have 70 hours total and to have completed the MEPL course (6 flight + 7 ground) and the LST.
Is this right?

HFD
hugh flung_dung is offline  
Reply
Old 12th August 2007 | 07:19
  #2 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 1999
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 27,399
Likes: 857
From: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
No he does not need an additional 20 hours of instruction from a FI authorised under JAR-FCL. He needs to have achieved a total of 20 such hours, so whatever instruction he received from a JAR-FCL FI towards his NPPL will count. For example, if your colleague had obtained his SSEA Class Rating by conversion from some other licence and had received only a handful of hours with a JAR-FCL FI, then he would need to make up the difference before he could be issued with a JAR-FCL PPL(A) with SEP Class Rating.

Rating to an existing JAR-FCL PPL(A) requires the training and testing you refer to; however, if he intends to open a JAR-FCL PPL(A) with MEP Class Rating without having first upgraded from NPPL with SSEA Class Rating, he would probably have to meet all the NPPL-to-PPL upgrade requirements on an MEP Class aeroplane - he would need to speak to the Authority to confirm this.

Simplest process is probably to meet the upgrade requirements for NPPL with SSEA Class Rating to JAR-FCL PPL(A) with SEP Class Rating first, then complete the MEP Class Rating training, then apply for JAR-FCL PPL(A) with both SEP Class Rating and MEP Class Rating - unless, that is, the Authority require him to be physically in possession of a JAR-FCL PPL(A) with SEP Class Rating before he can add the MEP Class Rating.
BEagle is offline  
Reply
Old 12th August 2007 | 11:50
  #3 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 1999
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 899
Likes: 42
From: Slowly decaying (disgracefully)
Thanks BEagle, that ties-up with my understanding (I omitted the word "total" when mentioning JAR FI hours). I advised him to speak directly to licensing because of his unusual situation but he hasn't yet done so.

Because of his range of experience (5-10 thousand hours as a QSP on a range of types including Hastings, Anson, Varsity, Valetta, Meteor, DC3, etc, etc.) and recently demonstrated skill I'm hoping that they will allow him to complete sufficient of the MEP course to "reach standard" and then to take the test; this will probably take his total hours with a JAR FI to around 10 - insisting on more in the interests of bureaucracy would be an expensive nonsense in this case. Hopefully our Gatwickian colleagues will see sense.

HFD
hugh flung_dung is offline  
Reply
Old 12th August 2007 | 13:31
  #4 (permalink)  
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: May 1999
Aviation Qualifications: ATP+Mil
Posts: 27,399
Likes: 857
From: Quite near 'An aerodrome somewhere in England'
Sorry, but the CAA's hands are undoubtedly tied by the JAR-FCL stipulations.

How did he obtain an NPPL (SSEA) with such low FI time? Or had he held a UK PPL sometime in the dim and distant?

Personally, I feel that since he hasn't flown any MEP aeroplane for nigh on 38 years, it would be a less than clever idea to skip on any of the training and testing requirements as laid down. They're very reasonable.
BEagle is offline  
Reply
Old 12th August 2007 | 21:12
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 683
Likes: 0
From: UK
BEagle,

How did he obtain an NPPL (SSEA) with such low FI time? Or had he held a UK PPL sometime in the dim and distant?
The answer is here, on page 6:

QSPs with previous flying experience in SEP aeroplanes who do not meet these requirements will be
credited as follows:

c. If they have not been current in military aircraft in the previous 10 years, they shall be required to
complete the training consolidation and testing requirements specified for holders of expired licences
and ratings.


and on page 7:

c. Where a SEP class rating included in such licences has expired by more than 10 years, the licence
holder shall undergo a course of instruction in a single-engine piston aeroplane as specified by a SEP FI
or CRI(SPA) which must include:
(1) 2 hours of stall awareness/spin avoidance training;
(2) 4 hours solo general handling exercises;
(3) 4 hours solo cross-country flying, including the NPPL qualifying cross-country flight.



hugh flung_dung

You have a pm


JD
Jumbo Driver is offline  
Reply
Old 13th August 2007 | 18:21
  #6 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 6,626
Likes: 12
From: UK
Meet the following requirements:

have passed the JAA PPL written examinations
have completed a 150nm X-country
have received 25 hours dual instruction - may include the 6 hours on the MEP course
Have 70 hours PIC of aeroplanes
complete the 7 hour MEP ground school and pass the Class Rating theory exam
Pass a skill test with a FE on a MEP aeroplane
Hold a JAA medical certificate
Whopity is offline  
Reply
Old 7th September 2007 | 14:30
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 1999
Aviation Qualifications: CPL
Posts: 899
Likes: 42
From: Slowly decaying (disgracefully)
Belated thanks Whopity - I think we're all in agreement for once

The guy is just about ready for the MEP LST, but after reading SD19 and LASORS there's one aspect that I'm still unclear about - the requirement for the 150nm flight.
Since there is no statement anywhere that the 150nm flight must be done in an MEP (if the PPL LST is in an MEP) I infer that it's acceptable for it to have been done in an SEP whilst holding an NPPL. In this case there won't be the usual "qualifying cross-country certificate" to submit with the PPL application but I assume that the HoT can certify that it was performed satisfactorily.

Comments?

HFD
hugh flung_dung is offline  
Reply
Old 9th September 2007 | 02:16
  #8 (permalink)  
50 Countries Visited
25 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 1999
Aviation Qualifications: ATPL
Posts: 7,378
Likes: 933
From: Den Haag
Sorry, but the CAA's hands are undoubtedly tied by the JAR-FCL stipulations.
(As I'm sure you know) actually, the CAA are still quite flexible, when required. I've had two TRI/TRE ratings/authorities issued on new types, without strictly meeting the JAR-FCL requirements (one was the second issued in the UK, the other the first.) I've always found them very pragmatic
212man is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.