Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Aircrew Forums > Flying Instructors & Examiners
Reload this Page >

VFR-Standard Rejoin ....

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Flying Instructors & Examiners A place for instructors to communicate with one another because some of them get a bit tired of the attitude that instructing is the lowest form of aviation, as seems to prevail on some of the other forums!

VFR-Standard Rejoin ....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24th March 2000 | 01:39
  #1 (permalink)  
d_boxman
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Unhappy VFR-Standard Rejoin ....


Chaps,

What are your thoughts on the Standard
rejoin being used at a controlled airfield ?

At the moment I work at an airfield (outside the UK) where the controllers normally put traffic on left and right downwinds depending on where the traffic is approaching from.

Local management wants them to introduce the standard rejoin to control circuit traffic.They are not happy with this
as generally they feel it is not as efficient as the method they are employing .Some aspects of it they don't like for instance traffic converging over the field at 2000ft ,
traffic crossing upwind end of active at 800ft with VFR departure supposed to stop climb at 500ft etc....

I understand that in the UK this standard rejoin is used alot but it is not that well established in this country.

Your thoughts?

Bye.

D.F.B.
 
Old 24th March 2000 | 06:59
  #2 (permalink)  
squeakmail
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Unhappy

In the same way that I, as a pilot, object to being INSTRUCTED to turn onto crosswind or base..or whatever (rather than being advised that it is now safe, or asked to do so when the condition of the aircraft and crew permit), I would have thought that you were hired by said management to control the air traffic - hence the phrase Air Traffic Controller.

Can't ATC tell local management that they will talk to the aeroplanes and move them safely and expeditiously - as per the manual - rather than be told how to do their job?

Or am I in looking for too rosy a world to live in?

------------------
LIVE in peace...or REST in it!
 
Old 24th March 2000 | 22:30
  #3 (permalink)  
d_boxman
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Unhappy

Hi squeakmail,

The man at the top is a pilot with no ATC experience and thinks he knows better than the experienced ATCOs.

Unusual situation dis-regarding the people who are trained to do the job.

Bye,

DB
 
Old 24th March 2000 | 23:34
  #4 (permalink)  
BlueLine
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Unhappy

In the main the standard overhead join is used at airfields where there is no ATC i.e. the radio is operated by a FISO or A/G operator, neither of whom are permitted to give instructions to aircraft in the air. The overhead join, if conducted correctly, is an efficient method of getting aircraft into an active circuit were it is the pilot who is responsible for the method of joining. If you have ATC then aircraft join as instructed in the most efficient manner applicable at the time. The overhead join will surely leave the controllers with nothing to do.
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.