Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Other Aircrew Forums > Flight Testing
Reload this Page >

Flight Test Rating

Wikiposts
Search
Flight Testing A forum for test pilots, flight test engineers, observers, telemetry and instrumentation engineers and anybody else involved in the demanding and complex business of testing aeroplanes, helicopters and equipment.

Flight Test Rating

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 29th Sep 2014, 18:11
  #1 (permalink)  
GipsyMagpie
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Flight Test Rating

For those who are looking to be compliant with EASA before next year and gaining a Flight Test or Flight Test Instructor rating, may I point out the terms of conversion are now in CAP804 part 1 section 4P. The key bit is you need to be CPL/IR which is of course not new news.
 
Old 29th Sep 2014, 21:23
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: east ESSEX
Posts: 4,670
Received 70 Likes on 45 Posts
Not sure about the `English` interpretation;ie Flight Test may mean an LPC/LST/Skills test on a Student,etc.
A `Test Flight` means means a flight to Test the aircraft/systems,etc,so it should be done by a `Test Pilot`,in simple terms...
Too many Sections/Parts/subparts to be a clear ,concise,accurate document...maybe that`s the game..
sycamore is online now  
Old 2nd Oct 2014, 22:00
  #3 (permalink)  
GipsyMagpie
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Test Pilot Rating would be much nicer
 
Old 2nd Oct 2014, 22:20
  #4 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 14,221
Received 48 Likes on 24 Posts
Sticking to the much older requirement where an authority simply assessed a pilot for a particular programme based upon their overall experience and qualifications, rather than creating an unnecessary "flight test" rating never called for by anybody but the authority itself would have been nicer still.

I blame the French.

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Old 16th Oct 2014, 11:44
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
To allay some possible concerns, doing some digging into this for work, CAP 804 seems clear that this rating does not apply for MTO mass below 2000 kg.

For the rating, CAP 804 refers a couple of times to flight test categories defined in Part 21. I have run searches in Part 21 and the AMC (which is of course not the law, only an acceptable means not the only means of compliance) and cannot find these definitions. Am I being blind or is CAP 804 referencing the wrong thing?
JOE-FBS is offline  
Old 16th Oct 2014, 15:34
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Europe
Age: 51
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Its the "new" Appendix XII for Part-21, see the NPA here:
NPA 2008-20 | EASA

Unfortunately, it's still in the rulemaking process (going for 6 years now), providing some CAA's to question if they can issue any FT rating at all, as the relevant link to Part-21 is "missing".
Skeeve is offline  
Old 17th Oct 2014, 10:18
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Thanks Skeeve I have now read that NPA and it explains a lot of what EASA has had us doing for our DOA which I could not explain from the existing legislation or GM / AMC.
JOE-FBS is offline  
Old 21st Oct 2014, 11:08
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
There is also a draft change to Part 21 here:

Opinion 07/2013 | EASA

but I cannot work-out when it may be implemented.
JOE-FBS is offline  
Old 1st Oct 2015, 11:54
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Ah, it was implemented in July 2015 by Commission Regulation EU 2015-1039:

http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-conte...R_0001&from=EN
JOE-FBS is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2015, 13:53
  #10 (permalink)  

Do a Hover - it avoids G
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Chichester West Sussex UK
Age: 91
Posts: 2,206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sticking to the much older requirement where an authority simply assessed a pilot for a particular programme based upon their overall experience and qualifications, rather than creating an unnecessary "flight test" rating never called for by anybody but the authority itself would have been nicer still.
Isn't that the truth.
John Farley is offline  
Old 2nd Oct 2015, 20:25
  #11 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 14,221
Received 48 Likes on 24 Posts
I was at a meeting in the Netherlands last week where I learned that the Dutch national authority is now actually issuing this rating.

I'm not sure if anybody else is yet?

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Old 4th Oct 2015, 20:26
  #12 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: South a bit
Posts: 34
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes, the UK CAA is issuing them!
ExV238 is offline  
Old 8th Oct 2015, 14:17
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: London (FAA CPL/CFI)
Posts: 272
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
I'm still not sure if it's worth converting to EASA, especially with the bilaterals still to be concluded.

Is anyone running a training course to this end?

Alex.
ahwalk01 is offline  
Old 9th Oct 2015, 07:11
  #14 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 14,221
Received 48 Likes on 24 Posts
Originally Posted by ExV238
Yes, the UK CAA is issuing them!
You don't have a pointer to any published procedures do you? I can't see anything on CAA's website.

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Old 9th Oct 2015, 12:01
  #15 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: South a bit
Posts: 34
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You don't have a pointer to any published procedures do you?
Yes, CAP804 Part I.

In my case I provided my original course graduation certificate, logbook evidence of flying on the course, end of course report and logbook evidence of current test flying. Plus (of course) my EASA licence and the rating application form. I also provided evidence of instructional flying, for a Flight Test Instructor Rating.
ExV238 is offline  
Old 10th Oct 2015, 21:56
  #16 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 14,221
Received 48 Likes on 24 Posts
Thanks for that ExV.

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Old 29th Nov 2015, 11:44
  #17 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Ottawa Canada
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Easa CAT 2 rating

Does anyone have any detailed knowledge on this ? I hold ICAO licenses and would like to work in flight test in Europe. I have a TPS background, 6000 hrs tot/2000 PIC Airbus.

Firstly, is it possible to get a Easa "validation" based on an ICAO license and put a Cat 2 / 1 flight test rating on it? How would I go about that?

If I had to convert to a Easa ATPL, with my experience, do I need to do all 14 exams or would there be some credit or reduced exam requirements for experienced airline crew?

Thanks.
flaretoland is offline  
Old 30th Nov 2015, 11:16
  #18 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Not far from the edge of the Milky Way Galaxy in the Orion Arm.
Posts: 510
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Blame the French or the Belgians or any one else in EASA land. For those of the old CAA (despite its faults) issued said licence for Test Pilot - based on experience on type and flying hours on type. Still got mine. Not sure if they do it now though (have a need for a Test Pilot for CRS/CofA as there is not the requirement for this type of Test Flight any more - under the new EASAry once an aircraft comes out of the hangar after a rip roaring CofA there is no longer a need to send someone up to see if all the bits are stuck on properly and that the aircraft performs according to the paperwork re: RoC, VNE, Stall sp, and the many others of the performance Test Flight. Maybe if something drops off or goes bang then (EASA) will dictate should be a Test Pilot to Test fly the post maintenance aircraft after all. Which there probably will be now that I have written this and that it will be all over the internet as a reslt.

@ flaretoland - Hi, Flare, You want to contact the ETPS its at qinetiq or something equally French sounding, anyway, they used to do and probably still do Test Pilot Courses for many overseas and pilots and other air forrces send their chaps and chapesses to complete the course. If you go on the right course you can test fly anywhere in the world. You don`t have to change your Canadian ATPL to a UK one unless you are planning on being employed in the UK by a UK company. There are different levels of Test Pilot - their are those who conduct Certificate of Airworthiness Test Flights after major maintenance like a CofA and also Production Aircraft Test flying thos aircraft which have never flown before - which is probably the most exciting and challenging. Anyway, contact them and they will advise you on the requirements for foreeign pilots or at least, direct you to the right place in the UKCAA http://www.etps.qinetiq.com/ bon chance

Had thought about going to the ETPS to get the very same authorization on my ticket - but be about £23,000 worse off - its only money. LOL.

Last edited by Natstrackalpha; 1st Dec 2015 at 11:16.
Natstrackalpha is offline  
Old 10th Feb 2017, 11:53
  #19 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
I imagine that it is far too obscure a thing to be commercially available, certainly a quick Google revealed nothing useful except to remind me to return to this thread, but does anyone know please of a Flight Test Engineer's logbook that is available to buy? We are standing up (for want of a better phrase) a team of FTEs and it would be a useful thing if we each had a dedicated logbook.
JOE-FBS is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.