Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Other Aircrew Forums > Flight Testing
Reload this Page >

Fast Jet Test Sqn Disbandment

Wikiposts
Search
Flight Testing A forum for test pilots, flight test engineers, observers, telemetry and instrumentation engineers and anybody else involved in the demanding and complex business of testing aeroplanes, helicopters and equipment.

Fast Jet Test Sqn Disbandment

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 8th Jan 2010, 09:47
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: MOD Boscombe Down
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exclamation Fast Jet Test Sqn Disbandment

Fast Jet Test Squadron Disbandment Dinner

Fast Jet Test Sqn (FJTS), based at MOD Boscombe Down, formerly known as Fixed Wing Test Sqn (FWTS) or ‘A Sqn’ will unfortunately be disbanding at the end of March 2010. FJTS will then be combined with the FJ OEUs as a combined Test Team at RAF Coningsby. To that end, we are holding a disbandment Day/Dinner in March and would like to invite all those who have served on FJTS and its forebears.

If you have ever served on, or know of anyone who has served on, FJTS and its forbears, be it a Pilot/Navigator etc, then please PM me so that I can add you to the distribution list for the invitations. If you can add a little précis of when you served, what you flew in, with whom you served etc that will aid me greatly (plus I can find out the old photographs from that time too).

If you have any questions/queries about this event, then do not hesitate to contact me.

Note to moderators; if you can make this a sticky, then I would be most grateful, many thanks.
Fast Jet Test Sqn. is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2010, 13:36
  #2 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 14,224
Received 49 Likes on 25 Posts
Stuck for a couple of months.

That must have been an incredibly difficult decision for somebody to have made, and I imagine that a lot of people are unimpressed with it, notwithstanding the potential benefits of combining the FJTS/SAOEU efforts. No longer having a permanent "A squadron" at Boscombe certainly doesn't feel right.

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2010, 16:44
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Peterborough
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Fast Jet OEUs" does that mean 17 or 41 is giving up their number?
Jimbo27 is offline  
Old 8th Jan 2010, 19:32
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: scotland
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
That is really sad. The end of impartial assessment, and of tps getting a wide type experience on which to base their judgement.
CharlieJuliet is offline  
Old 14th Feb 2010, 17:36
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: sussex
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Does your "etc" include ground crew ?
virgo is offline  
Old 5th Mar 2010, 16:10
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: MOD Boscombe Down
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exclamation Fjts Disbandment Dinner List Closed

Just to inform you that the attendance list for the forthcoming disbandment dinner is now CLOSED!!!!

If were planning to come and you are unsure whether you have returned the appropriate reply slip - then please PM me ASAP!

Unfortunately space is extremely limited and we would be hard pressed to fit in anyone else.

If Flt Lt Pryor-Jones can contact me ASAP with his contact details, I would be most grateful.
Fast Jet Test Sqn. is offline  
Old 24th Mar 2010, 11:36
  #7 (permalink)  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: UK
Posts: 14,224
Received 49 Likes on 25 Posts
Unstickied now.

But, congratulations to A-sqn/FWTS/FJTS for their 71 years of capable work (and an excellent disbandment party), and best of luck with the newly merged 17 and 41 squadrons.


And even more luck to all of the trials staff at BDN who will no longer have easy and regular opportunities to fly with or talk to their Test Pilots. I can't honestly see how they're going to make that work in the day-to-day aircraft T&E, but since they have no choice, I wish them the best of British luck.

G
Genghis the Engineer is offline  
Old 26th Mar 2010, 10:32
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: On the keyboard
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Genghis

The very last thing upon which successful T&E should rely is "luck". Sadly, I fear that the excellent dinner at Boscombe will also prove to have been the wake for independent T&E in the UK.

When a current practitioner extols the virtues of the "single type test pilot", what hope is there? Successful T&E has always required its practitioners to have the broadest possible base of experience in order to be able to assess effectively new kit and its performance - and to plan as a team the appropriate T&E programme. Without that base, and being mindful of the extreme shortage of available flying hours always available when a brand-new type is first offered for initial T&E, how will this new breed be able to use his tp experience to extract full value from that limited flight time?

The convoluted chain of command within which the 17 and 41 Sqn tps will operate also strikes me as unsound. Where is the day-to-day supervision and mentoring by experienced tps going to come from? Without that close contact with experienced tps and boffins, the quality of T&E is bound to suffer. I make that comment with absolutely no aspersions being cast on the quality of the individual tps on 17 or 41 Sqns.
Vertico is offline  
Old 18th Apr 2010, 22:08
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Oxfordshire
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Agree with Vertico. I was at the dinner and the briefing and couldn't believe that tp's were to be restricted to 1 type!! I remember clocking 14 in one month at Bosconbe in the 60's. I thought that the powers had got it wrong. They should have moved the Conningsby operation to Boscombe and achieved the operating savings that way.
deagles is offline  
Old 7th May 2010, 15:22
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Mars
Age: 16
Posts: 328
Received 9 Likes on 4 Posts
What a shame.

This was on the cards 10 years ago driven primarily by a successful campaign from 'industry' zealots to reduce the small print scutiny of their products. It's an age old conundrum where greed is sold as 'value' and the small guys suffer. But hey ho, there would of been promotions, bonuses and much ego polishing. Smoking holes won't cut it with their consciences because the same process that removed the scrutiny will have been specially designed to remove responsibility (at least for those in the ivory towers)

Good luck guys.
Flambards is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.