Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Other Aircrew Forums > Flight Testing
Reload this Page >

Laplace Transforms


Notices
Flight Testing A forum for test pilots, flight test engineers, observers, telemetry and instrumentation engineers and anybody else involved in the demanding and complex business of testing aeroplanes, helicopters and equipment.

Laplace Transforms

Old 23rd February 2007 | 09:10
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 768
Likes: 52
From: TBC
Laplace Transforms

Can anyone help me by telling me how to get the Laplace transform of (dy/dx)^2 ? I'm trying to solve a take off equation but don't really know how to do it unless it's power of one. It's been ages since i've had to use these gastly things.

Cheers,

Ginger
Gingerbread Man is online now  
Reply
Old 23rd February 2007 | 12:32
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
From: South Africa/U.A.E
If I'm not mistaken the rule is:

L(f^(n))=(s^n)*L(f)-(s^(n-1))*f(0)-(s^(n-2))*f'(0)-- ... -- (f^(n-1)(0))

Laplace transform of the derivative of any order n

Barry

Edit: Syntax error
BarryW is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd February 2007 | 16:44
  #3 (permalink)  
'India-Mike
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Yes, but the question is to find the laplace transform of (dy/dx)^2, not (d^2y/Dx^2)....

I thoroughly recommend Etkins 'Dynamics of Atmospheric Flight' - excellent for Laplace transforms (amongst other things)
 
Reply
Old 23rd February 2007 | 18:13
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
From: South Africa/U.A.E
Apologies,helps to read the problem properly.

Had a look in my maths textbooks, by Kreyzig and James, but could not find anything in either. My final year calculus formulas sheet had nothing similar either.

Do you have matlab/simulink would be easy enough to solve using it.

If you do find a way to solve it, please post your method I would like to see how its done.
BarryW is offline  
Reply
Old 23rd February 2007 | 18:20
  #5 (permalink)  
'India-Mike
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
No Barry, I suspect you might have interpreted it correctly. I just got a bit confused. Probably still confused!
 
Reply
Old 24th February 2007 | 00:32
  #6 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 768
Likes: 52
From: TBC
Thanks for the replies chaps, i'm glad to see it's not straight forward and I havne't just been a dunce! I think i've found a way around the L transform bit of it, but it's still proving difficult. Basically i'm trying to find the take off roll for a propellor powered UAV, but with only friction, lift and drag coefficients and mass and all the other constants. So I end up with an equation with acceleration as an unknown, velocity as an unknown, and some constants. Some manipulation made me think I had a solution, but it turned out to include complex numbers .

I have tried MatLab with a simple ordinary differential equation, but the chart of velocity against time it returned went up to 90m/s, which can't happen because the prop exhaust velocity is only 32m/s!

When I find a way of writing the formulas down so that I can post them, I will.

Cheers,

Ginger

P.S. India Mike, you're correct, I was looking for the square of the first differential, not the formula for the second differential. Wow! Am I really talking about this at this time on a Saturday morning? Goodnight!
Gingerbread Man is online now  
Reply
Old 24th February 2007 | 11:53
  #7 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 768
Likes: 52
From: TBC
I've got the same book but it doesn't seem to help in this case, despite being a very good book. It does actually have a modelling example for the take off run, but it's a bit too simplistic for what I want.
Gingerbread Man is online now  
Reply
Old 24th February 2007 | 13:03
  #8 (permalink)  
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 372
Likes: 7
From: Surrey
Simplifying Differential Equations

I don't know whether this helps, but the square of the first differential reminds me of v-squared, or (ds/dt)**2. In which case it can help if we keep it as v-squared, v**2, and write the second differential, d2s/dt**2 (which is dv/dt), as v.dv/ds.

With the v-squareds that crop up in many aero problems, this often rescues the situation by giving you a linear first-order differential equation in v and s rather than a non-linear one in v and t (or even a second order non-linear one in s and t).

Any help?

Last edited by D120A; 24th February 2007 at 13:27. Reason: Clarity (hopefully!)
D120A is offline  
Reply
Old 24th February 2007 | 15:46
  #9 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 768
Likes: 52
From: TBC
That is a help D120, thanks. I had already got there through the manipulation I mentioned above, which is how I got rid of the need for Laplace. I still ended up with a complex number in the mix though, which was most unwelcome.

Methinks that using Raymer I have found the solution:

Ground roll = (1/2*g*Ka)ln((Kt + KaVf^2)/(Kt + KaVi^2))

Where:

Kt = (T/W) - u

Ka = [rho/2(W/S)]*(uCL - CDo - KCL^2)

The formula I was using originally was from Raymer as well, but was looking for acceleration rather than the ground roll distance. I think this might be a case of 'keep it simple, stupid' .

Thanks for the help - it's nice to have such a wealth of expertise to tap into.

Cheers,

Ginger
Gingerbread Man is online now  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.