Wonky rotors
Thread Starter
Wonky rotors
Last night I was watching a film that featured a couple of BlackHawk choppers, when one of my friends turned to me and asked why the tail rotor was set angled slightly downward. I was rather embarrassed not to be able to provide him with a definite answer. Can anyone explain it for me?
Thinking it through, it seems that the tail rotor must provide some pitch force, but surely when the rotor changes speed/angle to yaw the aircraft, the pitch will change as well?
Cheers
Ginger
Thinking it through, it seems that the tail rotor must provide some pitch force, but surely when the rotor changes speed/angle to yaw the aircraft, the pitch will change as well?
Cheers
Ginger
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Philadelphia PA
Age: 73
Posts: 1,835
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
The H-60 series of helicopters has a tail rotor that is canted to provide both lift and lateral force. It does cause a change in pitching moment (and rolling moment) when the tail rotor thrust is changed. At the design weight/ cg condition, the mechanical mixing takes care of that - at other weight/cg conditions, the effects can be interesting. The automatic flight control system does mask some of the effect.
It was done to improve the cg range of the basic UH-60, which is quite far aft in most conditions.
It was done to improve the cg range of the basic UH-60, which is quite far aft in most conditions.
-AL@FT-
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: VA, USA
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Decreasing the sound level and providing extra lift.
It can have the tailrotor perpendicular but that means you will have more force to counteract rotation caused by the mainrotor so if there's more power why not use it for extra lift
(Of course the CG config allows you to do so too, have to mention that)
It can have the tailrotor perpendicular but that means you will have more force to counteract rotation caused by the mainrotor so if there's more power why not use it for extra lift
(Of course the CG config allows you to do so too, have to mention that)
Thread Starter
Cheers chaps, that's satisfied a curiosity for me 
.
On the same subject, can anyone explain the reason for the apache tail rotors not to be perpendicular to each other? Photo here. Is it just easier to fit everything in the right place if it's at that angle?
Ginger
.On the same subject, can anyone explain the reason for the apache tail rotors not to be perpendicular to each other? Photo here. Is it just easier to fit everything in the right place if it's at that angle?
Ginger
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Philadelphia PA
Age: 73
Posts: 1,835
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Describe (if I have time) the fun one has in pulling pitch in a H-60....
It's been quite a while, but the impression from flying the UH-60A was that this was exactly the machine one would want to be in if going in harm's way. Robust, solid and proof that performance is more important than excellent handling qualities, it did win me over quite convincingly.
it literally begged to be thrown around - (not that I've known any women like this in my sheltered life) - sort of - hit me, throw me around, I love it.
Takeoff was always right wheel first, then left wheel, and that would then be accompanied by some dancing on the tailwheel. With all the magic in the AFCS working, it was pretty straightforward- but hovering at light weight was always at a pronounced nose up, left wing low attitude. From a hover, at light weight, you could pull and pull and pull up on the collective and be passing 1,000' AGL before you got to 100% torque. Rate of climb at light weight and sea level was close to 4,000 fpm if my memory fails me.
The canted tail rotor only became a bit of an issue if you looked for it in rapid yaw rates, but it was generally easily compensated for.
Hope that whets some appetites....
It's been quite a while, but the impression from flying the UH-60A was that this was exactly the machine one would want to be in if going in harm's way. Robust, solid and proof that performance is more important than excellent handling qualities, it did win me over quite convincingly.
it literally begged to be thrown around - (not that I've known any women like this in my sheltered life) - sort of - hit me, throw me around, I love it.
Takeoff was always right wheel first, then left wheel, and that would then be accompanied by some dancing on the tailwheel. With all the magic in the AFCS working, it was pretty straightforward- but hovering at light weight was always at a pronounced nose up, left wing low attitude. From a hover, at light weight, you could pull and pull and pull up on the collective and be passing 1,000' AGL before you got to 100% torque. Rate of climb at light weight and sea level was close to 4,000 fpm if my memory fails me.
The canted tail rotor only became a bit of an issue if you looked for it in rapid yaw rates, but it was generally easily compensated for.
Hope that whets some appetites....
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Blackflies and Snow
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Apache tail rotor
Totally from memory, but I think this was done for dynamic reasons to reduce (eliminate) 4T vibration. It has a fringe benefit of reducing tail rotor noise at certain aspects as well.
