Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Other Aircrew Forums > Flight Testing
Reload this Page >

Anhedral and ducks

Wikiposts
Search

Notices
Flight Testing A forum for test pilots, flight test engineers, observers, telemetry and instrumentation engineers and anybody else involved in the demanding and complex business of testing aeroplanes, helicopters and equipment.

Anhedral and ducks

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10th May 2006 | 18:39
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
From: Norfolk
Talking Anhedral and ducks

OK guys, here is an odd one to exercise the aerodynamic brains. My wife breeds ducks and wildfowl (as well as driving helicopters). She asked me: "Why do ducks when they are making a glide approach to their water ski landings, and before they lower the undercarriage, sweep their wings forward and carry considerable anhedral. Surely anhedral is laterally destabilising and unlikely to increase lift". Er.....right.
rotorfossil is offline  
Old 10th May 2006 | 19:04
  #2 (permalink)  

Dog Tired
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,686
Likes: 2
From: uk
bending the wings to use as airbrakes.
fantom is offline  
Old 10th May 2006 | 21:08
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
From: Herts
Ducks

Its a well known fact that Ducks ar not stressed for inverted flight--

Otherwise they would quack up !!!! boom boom!
gaxan is offline  
Old 11th May 2006 | 12:19
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,297
Likes: 0
From: The Burrow, N53:48:02 W1:48:57, The Tin Tent - EGBS, EGBO
Originally Posted by rotorfossil
Surely anhedral is .......unlikely to increase lift". Er.....right.
Isn't the clue in the fact that they are landing not trying to get airborne?
DX Wombat is offline  
Old 11th May 2006 | 20:10
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: Blackflies and Snow
Total guess work, but I'll have a stab at this. I suspect they are using their tip feathers to detect the change in local airflow as the ground effect kicks in. This allows them to judge the flare which could be a challenge otherwise given the difficulty judging height over water.
AngloPepper is offline  
Old 11th May 2006 | 21:00
  #6 (permalink)  

Dog Tired
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,686
Likes: 2
From: uk
well, where do we start?
gaxan should be banned for a start. failing to mention that one should be 'feathered'. also failed to mention Vmc beak.
DX W knows better, I am certain. even a duck needs lift at rotation as well as the flare.
AP is clearly mad; who would use feathers rather than eyeballs to judge the flare?
I am the only sane one here. not for the first time...
fantom is offline  
Old 12th May 2006 | 00:32
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,300
Likes: 0
From: Canberra Australia
To maximise lift and drag close to the stall making best use of ground/over water effect contribution. Flicking the odd feather would probably be enough to control the roll instability from the anhedral.

Similar to the technique used by paragliders and to a lesser extent by hang gliders on landing.

Do the ducks always touch down directly into wind?

Wouldn't it be great to be able to do that!

Does anyone know the rest of the words to that old WW2 aviators song -

"Be kind to your web footed friends
Because a duck may be somebody's mother
Well you may think that this is the end
Well it is."
Milt is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.