Do you see any difference btw ''aborted'' and ''rejected'' takeoff?
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: inside of a pretty bustard
Age: 53
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
jb007, agree with you, in cockpit, the call is ''stop'', but what do you say to twr, aborted or rejected, 'cause someone told me if you stop by twr request is aborted, and by your own is rejected, is it true?
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Vancouver, BC.
Posts: 748
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The word 'Stop' and 'Stopping' as defined in CAP413 should be used. For example, once an aircraft has commenced the roll ATC will use the phraseology, 'bigjet 345 stop immediately, I say again stop immediately acknowledge'. Therefore, as Bucket and Spade say's, if you're rejecting the take, use the terminology 'bigjet 345 stopping'.
The change however from the use of Aborted to Rejected Take Off came about a good number of years ago; and I stand to be corrected here- but if I remember it was driven by Boeing who adopted RTO rather than aborted and has since been adopted by the industry. Came about around the same time we changed from 'overshooting' to 'Going Around'.
The change however from the use of Aborted to Rejected Take Off came about a good number of years ago; and I stand to be corrected here- but if I remember it was driven by Boeing who adopted RTO rather than aborted and has since been adopted by the industry. Came about around the same time we changed from 'overshooting' to 'Going Around'.
Guest
Posts: n/a
From a controller's perspective I wouldn't make a distinction between the two terms. FWIW, I tend to hear the procedure referred to as a rejected T/O when it's done for crew training and as an aborted T/O when it happens for real - but not exclusively in either case.
As no sig points out, the phraseology to be used on RTF (in the UK anyway) is set out in CAP 413.
As no sig points out, the phraseology to be used on RTF (in the UK anyway) is set out in CAP 413.
