Swissport badly prang Monarch A321 BHX
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Around the world.
Age: 42
Posts: 606
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Swissport badly prang Monarch A321 BHX
This morning a Swissport baggage loading truck was driven under a Monarch A321 at BHX and promptly wedged itself whilst also hitting the nose gear. Sadly for Monarch, the damage looks bad, with damage to both the nose gear (which is now at a strange angle) and fuselage (not just the skin but also structural damage). Not a good situation... 
Last edited by tom775257; 6th Oct 2008 at 18:52.
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: birmingham
Age: 48
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The A321 in question is G-OZBE which as you say has been quite badly damaged seen the photos but didnt get chance to go over and have a look for myself. It was hit by a belt loader just after 0600 this morning the driver said the brakes failed. Aircraft is likely to be grounded for several weeks
Join Date: May 2006
Location: nottingham
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"The brakes failed"
That old chestnut. I witnessed 2 similar incidents whilst i was on a secondment at Heathrow. Equipmenmt failure was blamed by the drivers but after investigations it was proved it was driver error. Is the a/c over the w/a?
That old chestnut. I witnessed 2 similar incidents whilst i was on a secondment at Heathrow. Equipmenmt failure was blamed by the drivers but after investigations it was proved it was driver error. Is the a/c over the w/a?
"The brakes failed" ! 
That's why there is a standing instruction (where I work) that you need to test the brakes 3 times before approaching any aircraft. I know that it's possible that they could fail on their 4th application, but I'm still amazed how this can happen.
That's why there is a standing instruction (where I work) that you need to test the brakes 3 times before approaching any aircraft. I know that it's possible that they could fail on their 4th application, but I'm still amazed how this can happen.
Join Date: May 2004
Location: airports
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That's why there is a standing instruction (where I work) that you need to test the brakes 3 times before approaching any aircraft.
Anyone got pictures, so we can make sensible comments!!!
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: birmingham
Age: 48
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The aircraft is now over on the Western Apron as we were unable to tow it till the follwing day because the nose leg had taken the brunt of the knock and it all had to be inspected before it could be moved. As to the brake failiure the jury is out pending the investagation but my money is on driver error
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: BHX
Posts: 418
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A/c now in LTN. Was speaking to one of the engineers earlier and the bill for getting it fit to position down was huge, never mind the cost of fixing it. If it is proved to be negligence don't Swissport have to pick up the bill instead of the insurance
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tracey Island
Posts: 1,496
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And I bet everyone (where you work) carries out a brake test 3 times.
Anyone got pictures, so we can make sensible comments!!!
Anyone got pictures, so we can make sensible comments!!!
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: BHX
Posts: 418
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Spoke to a MON engineer the other night who tells me BE could be in the hangar for some time. Airbus are still working out how to fix it, apparently they never anticipated the nose gear being hit at speed by a beltloader 
Yeh right.
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Gatwick
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Have seen the pictures today and the nosewheel is a mess. The idiot driving the belt loader was apparently standing up while driving due to a wet seat. (apparently)
The insurance claim is currently at £2m
Pay peanuts, get monkeys (or total idiots)
The insurance claim is currently at £2m
Pay peanuts, get monkeys (or total idiots)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: airports
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Standing up on a beltloader due to wet seat .......OMG........and Im guessing he must have set the hand throttle a little to much and had no chance of braking............"idiot"
LGWSTAR any chance you can post the pics.
LGWSTAR any chance you can post the pics.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: London, UK
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So there's not a "no blame" arrangement for incidents like this?
I know it's an extreme in this case, but maybe the next guy who knocks something accidently might keep quiet and not tell anyone, the damage not noticed on the walkaround, and then..
I know it's an extreme in this case, but maybe the next guy who knocks something accidently might keep quiet and not tell anyone, the damage not noticed on the walkaround, and then..
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dont be afraid
Well you shouldnt have to be afraid to elaborate, it's an interesting thing this no blame policy, if he did it and came forwards off his own bat, I presume this is in keeping with the no blame policy, did he do that, or was it immediatly obvious, or did he try and hide it ? if he came forwards then surely that excludes him from being sacked, sacked over the phone, is there no depths of human misery to which this industry will not stoop, I wouldnt treat my dog that way, even if he did rip the sofa.