Wikiposts
Search
Engineers & Technicians In this day and age of increased CRM and safety awareness, a forum for the guys and girls who keep our a/c serviceable.

EASA Form 1 v FAA 8130-3

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12th Dec 2010, 21:45
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Neither Here Nor There
Posts: 1,121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
EASA Form 1 v FAA 8130-3

Hi troops,

Could one of you learned gentlemen point me in the right direction as to where it states that new equipment purchased from the USA issued with a 8130-3 may be installed into UK registered aircraft in lieu of an EASA Form 1.

I recall reading some years back about a JAR/EASA Form 1 "or acceptable equivalent" but cannot remember where.

The price difference between buying new in the USA and in the UK is quite remarkable but getting an EASA Form 1 is not always that simple, almost as difficult as trying to get an answer out of our AMO.

Thanks for any assistance.

2close
2close is offline  
Old 13th Dec 2010, 00:19
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: near EDDF
Posts: 775
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Take a look here:

http://easa.europa.eu/ws_prod/c/doc/...G_SO_final.pdf
IFixPlanes is offline  
Old 13th Dec 2010, 02:38
  #3 (permalink)  
jxk
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Cilboldentune, Britannia
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Take a look at this AIRCOM it might help:

AIRCOM 2010/05: Changes to the U.S. Federal Regulations Regarding Export Certificates of Airworthiness | Publications | CAA
jxk is offline  
Old 13th Dec 2010, 05:42
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Munich, Germany
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you can't achieve a additional FORM ONE (sometimes the certificates are possible, but only on request), then the FAA 8130-3 needs a dual release. In field 19 (18) the point: "Other Regulation specified in block 13 (12) " must be marked and in field 13 (12) of the Form.
In Field 13 (12) the wording: " “[Name of repair station] certifies that the work specified in Blocks 12 and 13 was performed in accordance with EASA part 145 approval and with respect to that work, the aircraft component is considered ready for release to service under EASA approval number [insert number].”

In both cases need the MRO/MAN also a EASA-Rating.

This also works the other way round, so a FORM ONE-part can be installed on N-Reg. A/C with a dual release and a FAA remark in Field 12(13).
PEOPLESX is offline  
Old 13th Dec 2010, 07:30
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
New equipment from USA does not need dual release FAA 8130-3; only repaired (maintained items)
Weekly Leaks is offline  
Old 13th Dec 2010, 07:47
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Balmullo,Scotland
Posts: 932
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Form 1(dual release) is only required if the part is used.
You can get all the relevant info regarding the acceptance of FAA Form 8130 in CAP 562 Leaflet 1-12.
http://www.caa.co.uk/docs/33/CAP562.PDF
matkat is offline  
Old 13th Dec 2010, 13:17
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Or MIP-G here (page 10, para 11)
Weekly Leaks is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.