Go Back  PPRuNe Forums > Ground & Other Ops Forums > Engineers & Technicians
Reload this Page >

Decisions - Mechancial or Avionics

Wikiposts
Search
Engineers & Technicians In this day and age of increased CRM and safety awareness, a forum for the guys and girls who keep our a/c serviceable.

Decisions - Mechancial or Avionics

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5th Oct 2009, 08:02
  #1 (permalink)  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Australia
Age: 48
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Decisions - Mechancial or Avionics

Hello All

I'm due to very shortly apply for a Qantas apprenticeship and I'm having a bit of hard time trying to decide between doing avionics or mechancial.

I'm on a mechanical course at the moment (which is good) but I have also studied the EASA avionics module requirements (4,5,13). I will sit the 4,5,13 exams in December and expect to pass quite well (I hold an amateur radio license so have a bit of background in electronics)

Suggestions.

Whissper
whissper is offline  
Old 5th Oct 2009, 08:20
  #2 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Mumbai, INDIA
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Depends on what you prefer.
out here there is a better demand for avionics.
However I prefer Mechanical stream.
regds
MEL.
HAWK21M is offline  
Old 5th Oct 2009, 11:39
  #3 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: in a hotel
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
do you like being covered in dirt, oil, skydrol, s**t etc, freezing your nuts off in a gale, and generally working hard?

or

do you like drinking tea and playing on the x-box in your "workshop"?

it's not called lazyonics for nothing!
munster is offline  
Old 5th Oct 2009, 22:58
  #4 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: IRE
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
had to make that decision myself and I picked avionics, I love it tbh. I cant really compare it to the mechanical side though but all I know is that what the above poster said is very true, i have avoided doing alot of messy , frustrating , dirty jobs tbh, most notably the dinitrolling jobs.
zigmund is offline  
Old 5th Oct 2009, 23:52
  #5 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Behind You.....
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In Avionics, you get to work in an airconditioned room and play with yourself.

In Mechs, you get to work outside, in the harsh rain, in the timid snow, in the blistering sun.

Your choice.
powerstall is offline  
Old 6th Oct 2009, 06:40
  #6 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: at an airport
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Coneheads rule!

Has to be Avionics. Pay is normally better as well
spannerbearer is offline  
Old 6th Oct 2009, 07:00
  #7 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: australia
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You wont choose the stream, it will choose you..You will see in time when you look at coneheads, they are all very strange people.. Or maybe you will become, or should i say are already one of them...
lordofthewings is offline  
Old 6th Oct 2009, 08:25
  #8 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
Age: 59
Posts: 3,527
Received 209 Likes on 117 Posts
Not much call for avionics on a line station these days. The B1 has so many 'privilages' with regard to certifying what were tradionally 'avionics' or 'radio' that the B2 is now focused on base maintenance or on the line at a main base.

If you fancy the opportunity to work far and wide then B1 is, in my experience, the way to go.
However, there will always be the need for good B2s in the hangars so the choice is yours.

Good luck.
TURIN is offline  
Old 6th Oct 2009, 19:39
  #9 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: uk
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Like Turin says the ,the B2 has been virtually phased out on the line these days and theres a lot of crossover from the mechanical side into what was once exclusively avionics . And if you are an avio you`ll spend most of your time changing wheels and filling engine cowls with oil forgetting all you`ve learnt about jk flip flops . So if you can`t beat 'em join 'em.
Hand Shandy is offline  
Old 6th Oct 2009, 22:10
  #10 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Watford
Age: 70
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Both is the way to go.Do the one you're comfortable with first,then go for the other one.
B1B2 is the future.
WOTME? is offline  
Old 6th Oct 2009, 22:32
  #11 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: melbourne
Age: 36
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I hold an amateur radio license so have a bit of background in electronics
Dont expect this to get you far. Theres ALOT more to avionics.
SBR_RV is offline  
Old 8th Oct 2009, 09:04
  #12 (permalink)  
Registered User **
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: USA
Age: 49
Posts: 480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From an FAA AMT

Spent 2-3 years changing parts and understanding how a MRO operates.

Another 2 years doing line work, (exposure to avionics) but more importantly over all deep systems knowledge of a specific aircraft (blue water to A/P and NAV).

3-4 years as a (maintenance rep) or flight mechanic. No supervision or time clock, living 'la vida loca" Some days spent 40 hrs in rain and sleet or snow working by myself, others enjoyed on the beaches of the red sea, pacific islands etc etc...

2 more years in avionics and production supervision in an MRO. (I learned to hate myself)

2 more years doing avionics work on contract because if I was going to work in an MRO I did not want to come home covered in grease.

Back to the line for a company that offered to pay me just short of what I was worth and transfered into their A/V shop ASAP.

15 years now and I believe the FAA AMT experience has offered me the well rounded experience that makes me a better avionics tech. Systems knowledge of MDC/Boeing/Buss and some cooperate A/C has made me a better avionics tech.

It is in my experience is a disadvantage for any AMT/Engineer to limit their exposure to the aircraft they work on to a specific path.

I have respect for the structures guys out there and have jumped at the opportunity to do some simple repairs myself.


No disrespect at all to those that have found a passion for Avionics/Parts changers/Systems or Structures AMT/Engineers. I have just enjoyed the opportunities I have taken advantage of.


Speak up if the EU/JAR or other international regs give you a different opinion to my AMT experience?

Last edited by muduckace; 8th Oct 2009 at 09:16.
muduckace is offline  
Old 8th Oct 2009, 09:53
  #13 (permalink)  
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
Age: 59
Posts: 3,527
Received 209 Likes on 117 Posts
Looks like you made some very good decisions there Muduckace.

I've not heard of AMT before. Kept my head down.

Website looks very professional, is AMT a training company or an allround MRO? I couldn't work it out. (Differences in US/EU terminology I suppose).

Is it expensive to take their courses or is sponsorship required?
TURIN is offline  
Old 9th Oct 2009, 15:54
  #14 (permalink)  
Registered User **
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: USA
Age: 49
Posts: 480
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When I started out we were called A&P's we are now refered to as Aircraft Maintenance Technicians (yankee jergen). I believe US airlines have pressured the FAA to not refer to us as AME's as an Engineer is someone who is capable of thinking for himself in general consensus.

Airlines (believe Eastern being the front runner) had lobbied to have us classified as unskilled labour back in the early 80's for class and craft purposes of unionization then more constraint under the National Railway Labour ACT. that makes it harder for us to unionize and strike etc.etc.

Cheers,

Muduckace

P.S.

When I got my A&P back in the early/mid 90's it cost me 10k usd, I also recieved an AS out of it. There are 2 county (tech) schools one in New York and one in Miami that I know of that cost in the late 90's 3k usd or less. At the same time I could have gone to Embry Riddle paid 40k and recieved a B.S.. So the cost of an A&P liscence varied greatly. Not sure what the cost is today.

Last edited by muduckace; 11th Oct 2009 at 21:18.
muduckace is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.